Cargando…

Cash transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a one-time cash transfer of $C1000 in people who are unable to physically distance due to insufficient income. DESIGN: Open-label, multi-centre, randomised superiority trial. SETTING: Seven primary care sites in Ontario, Canada; six urban sites associated with St...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Persaud, Navindra, Thorpe, Kevin E, Bedard, Michael, Hwang, Stephen W, Pinto, Andrew, Jüni, Peter, da Costa, Bruno R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8662581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34924360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2021-001452
_version_ 1784613467497431040
author Persaud, Navindra
Thorpe, Kevin E
Bedard, Michael
Hwang, Stephen W
Pinto, Andrew
Jüni, Peter
da Costa, Bruno R
author_facet Persaud, Navindra
Thorpe, Kevin E
Bedard, Michael
Hwang, Stephen W
Pinto, Andrew
Jüni, Peter
da Costa, Bruno R
author_sort Persaud, Navindra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a one-time cash transfer of $C1000 in people who are unable to physically distance due to insufficient income. DESIGN: Open-label, multi-centre, randomised superiority trial. SETTING: Seven primary care sites in Ontario, Canada; six urban sites associated with St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto and one in Manitoulin Island. PARTICIPANTS: 392 individuals who reported trouble affording basic necessities due to disruptions related to COVID-19. INTERVENTION: After random allocation, participants either received the cash transfer of $C1000 (n=196) or physical distancing guidelines alone (n=196). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the maximum number of symptoms consistent with COVID-19 over 14 days. Secondary outcomes were meeting clinical criteria for COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 presence, number of close contacts, general health and ability to afford basic necessities. RESULTS: The primary outcome of number of symptoms reported by participants did not differ between groups after 2 weeks (cash transfer, mean 1.6 vs 1.9, ratio of means 0.83; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.24). There were no statistically significant effects on secondary outcomes of the meeting COVID-19 clinical criteria (7.9% vs 12.8%; risk difference −0.05; 95% CI −0.11 to 0.01), SARS-CoV-2 presence (0.5% vs 0.6%; risk difference 0.00 95% CI −0.02 to 0.02), mean number of close contacts (3.5 vs 3.7; rate ratio 1.10; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.46), general health very good or excellent (60% vs 63%; risk difference −0.03 95% CI −0.14 to 0.08) and ability to make ends meet (52% vs 51%; risk difference 0.01 95% CI −0.10 to 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: A single cash transfer did not reduce the COVID-19 symptoms or improve the ability to afford necessities. Further studies are needed to determine whether some groups may benefit from financial supports and to determine if a higher level of support is beneficial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04359264.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8662581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86625812021-12-10 Cash transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial Persaud, Navindra Thorpe, Kevin E Bedard, Michael Hwang, Stephen W Pinto, Andrew Jüni, Peter da Costa, Bruno R Fam Med Community Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a one-time cash transfer of $C1000 in people who are unable to physically distance due to insufficient income. DESIGN: Open-label, multi-centre, randomised superiority trial. SETTING: Seven primary care sites in Ontario, Canada; six urban sites associated with St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto and one in Manitoulin Island. PARTICIPANTS: 392 individuals who reported trouble affording basic necessities due to disruptions related to COVID-19. INTERVENTION: After random allocation, participants either received the cash transfer of $C1000 (n=196) or physical distancing guidelines alone (n=196). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the maximum number of symptoms consistent with COVID-19 over 14 days. Secondary outcomes were meeting clinical criteria for COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 presence, number of close contacts, general health and ability to afford basic necessities. RESULTS: The primary outcome of number of symptoms reported by participants did not differ between groups after 2 weeks (cash transfer, mean 1.6 vs 1.9, ratio of means 0.83; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.24). There were no statistically significant effects on secondary outcomes of the meeting COVID-19 clinical criteria (7.9% vs 12.8%; risk difference −0.05; 95% CI −0.11 to 0.01), SARS-CoV-2 presence (0.5% vs 0.6%; risk difference 0.00 95% CI −0.02 to 0.02), mean number of close contacts (3.5 vs 3.7; rate ratio 1.10; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.46), general health very good or excellent (60% vs 63%; risk difference −0.03 95% CI −0.14 to 0.08) and ability to make ends meet (52% vs 51%; risk difference 0.01 95% CI −0.10 to 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: A single cash transfer did not reduce the COVID-19 symptoms or improve the ability to afford necessities. Further studies are needed to determine whether some groups may benefit from financial supports and to determine if a higher level of support is beneficial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04359264. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8662581/ /pubmed/34924360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2021-001452 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Persaud, Navindra
Thorpe, Kevin E
Bedard, Michael
Hwang, Stephen W
Pinto, Andrew
Jüni, Peter
da Costa, Bruno R
Cash transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
title Cash transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
title_full Cash transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Cash transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Cash transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
title_short Cash transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
title_sort cash transfer during the covid-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8662581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34924360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2021-001452
work_keys_str_mv AT persaudnavindra cashtransferduringthecovid19pandemicamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thorpekevine cashtransferduringthecovid19pandemicamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bedardmichael cashtransferduringthecovid19pandemicamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hwangstephenw cashtransferduringthecovid19pandemicamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pintoandrew cashtransferduringthecovid19pandemicamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT junipeter cashtransferduringthecovid19pandemicamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dacostabrunor cashtransferduringthecovid19pandemicamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cashtransferduringthecovid19pandemicamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial