Cargando…
Cash transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a one-time cash transfer of $C1000 in people who are unable to physically distance due to insufficient income. DESIGN: Open-label, multi-centre, randomised superiority trial. SETTING: Seven primary care sites in Ontario, Canada; six urban sites associated with St...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8662581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34924360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2021-001452 |
_version_ | 1784613467497431040 |
---|---|
author | Persaud, Navindra Thorpe, Kevin E Bedard, Michael Hwang, Stephen W Pinto, Andrew Jüni, Peter da Costa, Bruno R |
author_facet | Persaud, Navindra Thorpe, Kevin E Bedard, Michael Hwang, Stephen W Pinto, Andrew Jüni, Peter da Costa, Bruno R |
author_sort | Persaud, Navindra |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a one-time cash transfer of $C1000 in people who are unable to physically distance due to insufficient income. DESIGN: Open-label, multi-centre, randomised superiority trial. SETTING: Seven primary care sites in Ontario, Canada; six urban sites associated with St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto and one in Manitoulin Island. PARTICIPANTS: 392 individuals who reported trouble affording basic necessities due to disruptions related to COVID-19. INTERVENTION: After random allocation, participants either received the cash transfer of $C1000 (n=196) or physical distancing guidelines alone (n=196). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the maximum number of symptoms consistent with COVID-19 over 14 days. Secondary outcomes were meeting clinical criteria for COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 presence, number of close contacts, general health and ability to afford basic necessities. RESULTS: The primary outcome of number of symptoms reported by participants did not differ between groups after 2 weeks (cash transfer, mean 1.6 vs 1.9, ratio of means 0.83; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.24). There were no statistically significant effects on secondary outcomes of the meeting COVID-19 clinical criteria (7.9% vs 12.8%; risk difference −0.05; 95% CI −0.11 to 0.01), SARS-CoV-2 presence (0.5% vs 0.6%; risk difference 0.00 95% CI −0.02 to 0.02), mean number of close contacts (3.5 vs 3.7; rate ratio 1.10; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.46), general health very good or excellent (60% vs 63%; risk difference −0.03 95% CI −0.14 to 0.08) and ability to make ends meet (52% vs 51%; risk difference 0.01 95% CI −0.10 to 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: A single cash transfer did not reduce the COVID-19 symptoms or improve the ability to afford necessities. Further studies are needed to determine whether some groups may benefit from financial supports and to determine if a higher level of support is beneficial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04359264. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8662581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86625812021-12-10 Cash transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial Persaud, Navindra Thorpe, Kevin E Bedard, Michael Hwang, Stephen W Pinto, Andrew Jüni, Peter da Costa, Bruno R Fam Med Community Health Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a one-time cash transfer of $C1000 in people who are unable to physically distance due to insufficient income. DESIGN: Open-label, multi-centre, randomised superiority trial. SETTING: Seven primary care sites in Ontario, Canada; six urban sites associated with St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto and one in Manitoulin Island. PARTICIPANTS: 392 individuals who reported trouble affording basic necessities due to disruptions related to COVID-19. INTERVENTION: After random allocation, participants either received the cash transfer of $C1000 (n=196) or physical distancing guidelines alone (n=196). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the maximum number of symptoms consistent with COVID-19 over 14 days. Secondary outcomes were meeting clinical criteria for COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 presence, number of close contacts, general health and ability to afford basic necessities. RESULTS: The primary outcome of number of symptoms reported by participants did not differ between groups after 2 weeks (cash transfer, mean 1.6 vs 1.9, ratio of means 0.83; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.24). There were no statistically significant effects on secondary outcomes of the meeting COVID-19 clinical criteria (7.9% vs 12.8%; risk difference −0.05; 95% CI −0.11 to 0.01), SARS-CoV-2 presence (0.5% vs 0.6%; risk difference 0.00 95% CI −0.02 to 0.02), mean number of close contacts (3.5 vs 3.7; rate ratio 1.10; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.46), general health very good or excellent (60% vs 63%; risk difference −0.03 95% CI −0.14 to 0.08) and ability to make ends meet (52% vs 51%; risk difference 0.01 95% CI −0.10 to 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: A single cash transfer did not reduce the COVID-19 symptoms or improve the ability to afford necessities. Further studies are needed to determine whether some groups may benefit from financial supports and to determine if a higher level of support is beneficial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04359264. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8662581/ /pubmed/34924360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2021-001452 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Persaud, Navindra Thorpe, Kevin E Bedard, Michael Hwang, Stephen W Pinto, Andrew Jüni, Peter da Costa, Bruno R Cash transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial |
title | Cash transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Cash transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Cash transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Cash transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Cash transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | cash transfer during the covid-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8662581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34924360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2021-001452 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT persaudnavindra cashtransferduringthecovid19pandemicamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thorpekevine cashtransferduringthecovid19pandemicamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bedardmichael cashtransferduringthecovid19pandemicamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hwangstephenw cashtransferduringthecovid19pandemicamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pintoandrew cashtransferduringthecovid19pandemicamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT junipeter cashtransferduringthecovid19pandemicamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dacostabrunor cashtransferduringthecovid19pandemicamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cashtransferduringthecovid19pandemicamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial |