Cargando…

First Validation of the Referential Process Post-Session Scale – Therapist Version (RPPS-T)

OBJECTIVE: Bucci’s multiple code theory maintains that for a significant change the patient-therapist relationship should foster a referential process shaping in three alternating phases: arousal of emotion schemas, symbolizing/narrating emotional experiences, and reflecting/reorganizing the emotion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Negri, Attà, Andreoli, Giovanbattista, Mariani, Rachele, De Bei, Francesco, Rocco, Diego, Greco, Andrea, Bucci, Wilma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Giovanni Fioriti Editore srl 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8662713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34909010
http://dx.doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20200601
_version_ 1784613496717049856
author Negri, Attà
Andreoli, Giovanbattista
Mariani, Rachele
De Bei, Francesco
Rocco, Diego
Greco, Andrea
Bucci, Wilma
author_facet Negri, Attà
Andreoli, Giovanbattista
Mariani, Rachele
De Bei, Francesco
Rocco, Diego
Greco, Andrea
Bucci, Wilma
author_sort Negri, Attà
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Bucci’s multiple code theory maintains that for a significant change the patient-therapist relationship should foster a referential process shaping in three alternating phases: arousal of emotion schemas, symbolizing/narrating emotional experiences, and reflecting/reorganizing the emotional meanings. Until now to monitor these phases clinicians and researchers have used several referential process computerized linguistic measures, which however need the sessions verbatim transcription. In order to have a less time-consuming method we developed and tested a therapist self-report questionnaire measuring the referential process phases. METHOD: We asked eight psychotherapists in a first study and nine psychotherapists in a second study to complete the Referential Process Post-session Scale – Therapist version (RPPS-T) just after the end of their sessions. In a third study we transcribed 29 sessions conducted by three psychotherapists to calculate the correlations between the RPPS-T scores and the computerized linguistic measures of the referential process calculated on the session transcripts. RESULTS: In the first study we collected 105 evaluations regarding 29 patients and an exploratory factor analysis revealed a four-factor pattern consistent with the hypothesized constructs. The analysis reduced the initial pool of 42 items to 12. In the second study 130 sessions with 25 different patients have been evaluated on the shortened version of the RPPS-T and a confirmatory factor analysis found that the four-factor model satisfactorily fitted the new data as well. In the third study we found that the factors of RPPS-T regarding the symbolizing phase correlated with the corresponding computerized linguistic measures calculated on the session transcripts. CONCLUSIONS: The RPPS-T received a first validation as a concurrent measure of the referential process, especially for the symbolizing phase, and could be considered a useful instrument for research and supervision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8662713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Giovanni Fioriti Editore srl
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86627132021-12-13 First Validation of the Referential Process Post-Session Scale – Therapist Version (RPPS-T) Negri, Attà Andreoli, Giovanbattista Mariani, Rachele De Bei, Francesco Rocco, Diego Greco, Andrea Bucci, Wilma Clin Neuropsychiatry Research Article OBJECTIVE: Bucci’s multiple code theory maintains that for a significant change the patient-therapist relationship should foster a referential process shaping in three alternating phases: arousal of emotion schemas, symbolizing/narrating emotional experiences, and reflecting/reorganizing the emotional meanings. Until now to monitor these phases clinicians and researchers have used several referential process computerized linguistic measures, which however need the sessions verbatim transcription. In order to have a less time-consuming method we developed and tested a therapist self-report questionnaire measuring the referential process phases. METHOD: We asked eight psychotherapists in a first study and nine psychotherapists in a second study to complete the Referential Process Post-session Scale – Therapist version (RPPS-T) just after the end of their sessions. In a third study we transcribed 29 sessions conducted by three psychotherapists to calculate the correlations between the RPPS-T scores and the computerized linguistic measures of the referential process calculated on the session transcripts. RESULTS: In the first study we collected 105 evaluations regarding 29 patients and an exploratory factor analysis revealed a four-factor pattern consistent with the hypothesized constructs. The analysis reduced the initial pool of 42 items to 12. In the second study 130 sessions with 25 different patients have been evaluated on the shortened version of the RPPS-T and a confirmatory factor analysis found that the four-factor model satisfactorily fitted the new data as well. In the third study we found that the factors of RPPS-T regarding the symbolizing phase correlated with the corresponding computerized linguistic measures calculated on the session transcripts. CONCLUSIONS: The RPPS-T received a first validation as a concurrent measure of the referential process, especially for the symbolizing phase, and could be considered a useful instrument for research and supervision. Giovanni Fioriti Editore srl 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8662713/ /pubmed/34909010 http://dx.doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20200601 Text en © 2020 Giovanni Fioriti Editore s.r.l. This is an open access article. Distribution and reproduction are permitted in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Negri, Attà
Andreoli, Giovanbattista
Mariani, Rachele
De Bei, Francesco
Rocco, Diego
Greco, Andrea
Bucci, Wilma
First Validation of the Referential Process Post-Session Scale – Therapist Version (RPPS-T)
title First Validation of the Referential Process Post-Session Scale – Therapist Version (RPPS-T)
title_full First Validation of the Referential Process Post-Session Scale – Therapist Version (RPPS-T)
title_fullStr First Validation of the Referential Process Post-Session Scale – Therapist Version (RPPS-T)
title_full_unstemmed First Validation of the Referential Process Post-Session Scale – Therapist Version (RPPS-T)
title_short First Validation of the Referential Process Post-Session Scale – Therapist Version (RPPS-T)
title_sort first validation of the referential process post-session scale – therapist version (rpps-t)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8662713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34909010
http://dx.doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20200601
work_keys_str_mv AT negriatta firstvalidationofthereferentialprocesspostsessionscaletherapistversionrppst
AT andreoligiovanbattista firstvalidationofthereferentialprocesspostsessionscaletherapistversionrppst
AT marianirachele firstvalidationofthereferentialprocesspostsessionscaletherapistversionrppst
AT debeifrancesco firstvalidationofthereferentialprocesspostsessionscaletherapistversionrppst
AT roccodiego firstvalidationofthereferentialprocesspostsessionscaletherapistversionrppst
AT grecoandrea firstvalidationofthereferentialprocesspostsessionscaletherapistversionrppst
AT bucciwilma firstvalidationofthereferentialprocesspostsessionscaletherapistversionrppst