Cargando…
Is measurement of central venous pressure required to estimate systemic vascular resistance? A retrospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: The clinical range of central venous pressure (CVP) (typically 5 to 15 mmHg) is much less than the range of mean arterial blood pressure (60 to 120 mmHg), suggesting that CVP may have little impact on estimation of systemic vascular resistance (SVR). The accuracy and feasibility of using...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8662880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34893034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01522-3 |
_version_ | 1784613529130631168 |
---|---|
author | Oh, Chahyun Noh, Chan Hong, Boohwi Shin, Suyeon Jeong, Kuhee Lim, Chaeseong Kim, Yoon-Hee Lee, Soomin Lee, Sun Yeul |
author_facet | Oh, Chahyun Noh, Chan Hong, Boohwi Shin, Suyeon Jeong, Kuhee Lim, Chaeseong Kim, Yoon-Hee Lee, Soomin Lee, Sun Yeul |
author_sort | Oh, Chahyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The clinical range of central venous pressure (CVP) (typically 5 to 15 mmHg) is much less than the range of mean arterial blood pressure (60 to 120 mmHg), suggesting that CVP may have little impact on estimation of systemic vascular resistance (SVR). The accuracy and feasibility of using an arbitrary CVP rather than actual CVP for the estimation of SVR during intraoperative period is not known. METHODS: Using vital records obtained from patients who underwent neurological and cardiac surgery, the present study retrospectively calculated SVR using fixed values of CVP (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mmHg) and randomly changing values of CVP (5 to 15 mmHg) and compared these calculated SVRs with actual SVR, calculated using actual CVP. Differences between actual SVR and SVRs based on fixed and random CVPs were quantified as root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). Bland-Altman analysis and four-quadrant plot analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients are included, including 18 who underwent neurosurgery and 16 who underwent cardiac surgery; 501,380 s (139.3 h) of data was analyzed. The SVR derived from a fixed CVP of 10 mmHg (SVRf10) showed the highest accuracy (RMSE: 115 and 104 [dynes/sec/cm(− 5)] and MAPE: 6.3 and 5.7% in neurological and cardiac surgery, respectively). The 95% limits of agreement between SVRf10 and actual SVR were − 208.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], − 306.3 to − 148.1) and 242.2 (95% CI, 181.8 to 340.0) dynes/sec/cm(− 5) in neurosurgery and − 268.1 (95% CI, − 367.5 to − 207.7) and 163.2 (95% CI, 102.9 to 262.6) dynes/sec/cm(− 5) in cardiac surgery. All the SVRs derived from the fixed CVPs (regardless of its absolute value) showed excellent trending ability (concordance rate > 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: SVR can be estimated from a fixed value of CVP without causing significant deviation or a loss of trending ability. However, caution is needed when using point estimates of SVR when the actual CVP is expected to be out of the typical clinical range. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered Clinical Research Information Service, a clinical trial registry in South Korea (KCT0006187). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8662880 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86628802021-12-13 Is measurement of central venous pressure required to estimate systemic vascular resistance? A retrospective cohort study Oh, Chahyun Noh, Chan Hong, Boohwi Shin, Suyeon Jeong, Kuhee Lim, Chaeseong Kim, Yoon-Hee Lee, Soomin Lee, Sun Yeul BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: The clinical range of central venous pressure (CVP) (typically 5 to 15 mmHg) is much less than the range of mean arterial blood pressure (60 to 120 mmHg), suggesting that CVP may have little impact on estimation of systemic vascular resistance (SVR). The accuracy and feasibility of using an arbitrary CVP rather than actual CVP for the estimation of SVR during intraoperative period is not known. METHODS: Using vital records obtained from patients who underwent neurological and cardiac surgery, the present study retrospectively calculated SVR using fixed values of CVP (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mmHg) and randomly changing values of CVP (5 to 15 mmHg) and compared these calculated SVRs with actual SVR, calculated using actual CVP. Differences between actual SVR and SVRs based on fixed and random CVPs were quantified as root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). Bland-Altman analysis and four-quadrant plot analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients are included, including 18 who underwent neurosurgery and 16 who underwent cardiac surgery; 501,380 s (139.3 h) of data was analyzed. The SVR derived from a fixed CVP of 10 mmHg (SVRf10) showed the highest accuracy (RMSE: 115 and 104 [dynes/sec/cm(− 5)] and MAPE: 6.3 and 5.7% in neurological and cardiac surgery, respectively). The 95% limits of agreement between SVRf10 and actual SVR were − 208.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], − 306.3 to − 148.1) and 242.2 (95% CI, 181.8 to 340.0) dynes/sec/cm(− 5) in neurosurgery and − 268.1 (95% CI, − 367.5 to − 207.7) and 163.2 (95% CI, 102.9 to 262.6) dynes/sec/cm(− 5) in cardiac surgery. All the SVRs derived from the fixed CVPs (regardless of its absolute value) showed excellent trending ability (concordance rate > 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: SVR can be estimated from a fixed value of CVP without causing significant deviation or a loss of trending ability. However, caution is needed when using point estimates of SVR when the actual CVP is expected to be out of the typical clinical range. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered Clinical Research Information Service, a clinical trial registry in South Korea (KCT0006187). BioMed Central 2021-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8662880/ /pubmed/34893034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01522-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Oh, Chahyun Noh, Chan Hong, Boohwi Shin, Suyeon Jeong, Kuhee Lim, Chaeseong Kim, Yoon-Hee Lee, Soomin Lee, Sun Yeul Is measurement of central venous pressure required to estimate systemic vascular resistance? A retrospective cohort study |
title | Is measurement of central venous pressure required to estimate systemic vascular resistance? A retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Is measurement of central venous pressure required to estimate systemic vascular resistance? A retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Is measurement of central venous pressure required to estimate systemic vascular resistance? A retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Is measurement of central venous pressure required to estimate systemic vascular resistance? A retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Is measurement of central venous pressure required to estimate systemic vascular resistance? A retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | is measurement of central venous pressure required to estimate systemic vascular resistance? a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8662880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34893034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01522-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohchahyun ismeasurementofcentralvenouspressurerequiredtoestimatesystemicvascularresistancearetrospectivecohortstudy AT nohchan ismeasurementofcentralvenouspressurerequiredtoestimatesystemicvascularresistancearetrospectivecohortstudy AT hongboohwi ismeasurementofcentralvenouspressurerequiredtoestimatesystemicvascularresistancearetrospectivecohortstudy AT shinsuyeon ismeasurementofcentralvenouspressurerequiredtoestimatesystemicvascularresistancearetrospectivecohortstudy AT jeongkuhee ismeasurementofcentralvenouspressurerequiredtoestimatesystemicvascularresistancearetrospectivecohortstudy AT limchaeseong ismeasurementofcentralvenouspressurerequiredtoestimatesystemicvascularresistancearetrospectivecohortstudy AT kimyoonhee ismeasurementofcentralvenouspressurerequiredtoestimatesystemicvascularresistancearetrospectivecohortstudy AT leesoomin ismeasurementofcentralvenouspressurerequiredtoestimatesystemicvascularresistancearetrospectivecohortstudy AT leesunyeul ismeasurementofcentralvenouspressurerequiredtoestimatesystemicvascularresistancearetrospectivecohortstudy |