Cargando…

Is measurement of central venous pressure required to estimate systemic vascular resistance? A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The clinical range of central venous pressure (CVP) (typically 5 to 15 mmHg) is much less than the range of mean arterial blood pressure (60 to 120 mmHg), suggesting that CVP may have little impact on estimation of systemic vascular resistance (SVR). The accuracy and feasibility of using...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oh, Chahyun, Noh, Chan, Hong, Boohwi, Shin, Suyeon, Jeong, Kuhee, Lim, Chaeseong, Kim, Yoon-Hee, Lee, Soomin, Lee, Sun Yeul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8662880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34893034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01522-3
_version_ 1784613529130631168
author Oh, Chahyun
Noh, Chan
Hong, Boohwi
Shin, Suyeon
Jeong, Kuhee
Lim, Chaeseong
Kim, Yoon-Hee
Lee, Soomin
Lee, Sun Yeul
author_facet Oh, Chahyun
Noh, Chan
Hong, Boohwi
Shin, Suyeon
Jeong, Kuhee
Lim, Chaeseong
Kim, Yoon-Hee
Lee, Soomin
Lee, Sun Yeul
author_sort Oh, Chahyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The clinical range of central venous pressure (CVP) (typically 5 to 15 mmHg) is much less than the range of mean arterial blood pressure (60 to 120 mmHg), suggesting that CVP may have little impact on estimation of systemic vascular resistance (SVR). The accuracy and feasibility of using an arbitrary CVP rather than actual CVP for the estimation of SVR during intraoperative period is not known. METHODS: Using vital records obtained from patients who underwent neurological and cardiac surgery, the present study retrospectively calculated SVR using fixed values of CVP (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mmHg) and randomly changing values of CVP (5 to 15 mmHg) and compared these calculated SVRs with actual SVR, calculated using actual CVP. Differences between actual SVR and SVRs based on fixed and random CVPs were quantified as root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). Bland-Altman analysis and four-quadrant plot analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients are included, including 18 who underwent neurosurgery and 16 who underwent cardiac surgery; 501,380 s (139.3 h) of data was analyzed. The SVR derived from a fixed CVP of 10 mmHg (SVRf10) showed the highest accuracy (RMSE: 115 and 104 [dynes/sec/cm(− 5)] and MAPE: 6.3 and 5.7% in neurological and cardiac surgery, respectively). The 95% limits of agreement between SVRf10 and actual SVR were − 208.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], − 306.3 to − 148.1) and 242.2 (95% CI, 181.8 to 340.0) dynes/sec/cm(− 5) in neurosurgery and − 268.1 (95% CI, − 367.5 to − 207.7) and 163.2 (95% CI, 102.9 to 262.6) dynes/sec/cm(− 5) in cardiac surgery. All the SVRs derived from the fixed CVPs (regardless of its absolute value) showed excellent trending ability (concordance rate > 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: SVR can be estimated from a fixed value of CVP without causing significant deviation or a loss of trending ability. However, caution is needed when using point estimates of SVR when the actual CVP is expected to be out of the typical clinical range. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered Clinical Research Information Service, a clinical trial registry in South Korea (KCT0006187).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8662880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86628802021-12-13 Is measurement of central venous pressure required to estimate systemic vascular resistance? A retrospective cohort study Oh, Chahyun Noh, Chan Hong, Boohwi Shin, Suyeon Jeong, Kuhee Lim, Chaeseong Kim, Yoon-Hee Lee, Soomin Lee, Sun Yeul BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: The clinical range of central venous pressure (CVP) (typically 5 to 15 mmHg) is much less than the range of mean arterial blood pressure (60 to 120 mmHg), suggesting that CVP may have little impact on estimation of systemic vascular resistance (SVR). The accuracy and feasibility of using an arbitrary CVP rather than actual CVP for the estimation of SVR during intraoperative period is not known. METHODS: Using vital records obtained from patients who underwent neurological and cardiac surgery, the present study retrospectively calculated SVR using fixed values of CVP (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mmHg) and randomly changing values of CVP (5 to 15 mmHg) and compared these calculated SVRs with actual SVR, calculated using actual CVP. Differences between actual SVR and SVRs based on fixed and random CVPs were quantified as root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). Bland-Altman analysis and four-quadrant plot analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients are included, including 18 who underwent neurosurgery and 16 who underwent cardiac surgery; 501,380 s (139.3 h) of data was analyzed. The SVR derived from a fixed CVP of 10 mmHg (SVRf10) showed the highest accuracy (RMSE: 115 and 104 [dynes/sec/cm(− 5)] and MAPE: 6.3 and 5.7% in neurological and cardiac surgery, respectively). The 95% limits of agreement between SVRf10 and actual SVR were − 208.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], − 306.3 to − 148.1) and 242.2 (95% CI, 181.8 to 340.0) dynes/sec/cm(− 5) in neurosurgery and − 268.1 (95% CI, − 367.5 to − 207.7) and 163.2 (95% CI, 102.9 to 262.6) dynes/sec/cm(− 5) in cardiac surgery. All the SVRs derived from the fixed CVPs (regardless of its absolute value) showed excellent trending ability (concordance rate > 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: SVR can be estimated from a fixed value of CVP without causing significant deviation or a loss of trending ability. However, caution is needed when using point estimates of SVR when the actual CVP is expected to be out of the typical clinical range. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered Clinical Research Information Service, a clinical trial registry in South Korea (KCT0006187). BioMed Central 2021-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8662880/ /pubmed/34893034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01522-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Oh, Chahyun
Noh, Chan
Hong, Boohwi
Shin, Suyeon
Jeong, Kuhee
Lim, Chaeseong
Kim, Yoon-Hee
Lee, Soomin
Lee, Sun Yeul
Is measurement of central venous pressure required to estimate systemic vascular resistance? A retrospective cohort study
title Is measurement of central venous pressure required to estimate systemic vascular resistance? A retrospective cohort study
title_full Is measurement of central venous pressure required to estimate systemic vascular resistance? A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Is measurement of central venous pressure required to estimate systemic vascular resistance? A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Is measurement of central venous pressure required to estimate systemic vascular resistance? A retrospective cohort study
title_short Is measurement of central venous pressure required to estimate systemic vascular resistance? A retrospective cohort study
title_sort is measurement of central venous pressure required to estimate systemic vascular resistance? a retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8662880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34893034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-021-01522-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ohchahyun ismeasurementofcentralvenouspressurerequiredtoestimatesystemicvascularresistancearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT nohchan ismeasurementofcentralvenouspressurerequiredtoestimatesystemicvascularresistancearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT hongboohwi ismeasurementofcentralvenouspressurerequiredtoestimatesystemicvascularresistancearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT shinsuyeon ismeasurementofcentralvenouspressurerequiredtoestimatesystemicvascularresistancearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT jeongkuhee ismeasurementofcentralvenouspressurerequiredtoestimatesystemicvascularresistancearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT limchaeseong ismeasurementofcentralvenouspressurerequiredtoestimatesystemicvascularresistancearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT kimyoonhee ismeasurementofcentralvenouspressurerequiredtoestimatesystemicvascularresistancearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT leesoomin ismeasurementofcentralvenouspressurerequiredtoestimatesystemicvascularresistancearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT leesunyeul ismeasurementofcentralvenouspressurerequiredtoestimatesystemicvascularresistancearetrospectivecohortstudy