Cargando…
Selective termination of the fetus in multiple pregnancies using ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the perinatal outcomes in women with selective termination using ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS: Complicated monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies and multiple pregnancies with an indication for selective termination by ultrasound-guided coagulation of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8662893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34893028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04285-4 |
_version_ | 1784613532071886848 |
---|---|
author | Li, Nan Sun, Jimei Wang, Jiayan Jian, Wei Lu, Jing Miao, Yonghui Li, Yufan Chen, Fei Chen, Dunjin Ye, Xiaoqing Chen, Min |
author_facet | Li, Nan Sun, Jimei Wang, Jiayan Jian, Wei Lu, Jing Miao, Yonghui Li, Yufan Chen, Fei Chen, Dunjin Ye, Xiaoqing Chen, Min |
author_sort | Li, Nan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate the perinatal outcomes in women with selective termination using ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS: Complicated monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies and multiple pregnancies with an indication for selective termination by ultrasound-guided coagulation of the umbilical cord with RFA under local anesthesia between July 2013 and Jan 2020 were reviewed. We analyzed the indications, gestational age at the time of the procedure, cycles of RFA, duration of the procedure, and perinatal outcome. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirteen patients were treated during this period. Seven of whom were lost of follow-up. The remaining 306 cases, including 266 pairs of monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twins (86.93%), two pairs of monoamniotic twins (0.65%), 30 dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) triplets (1%), and three monochorionic triamniotic (MCTA) triplets (0.98%), were analyzed. Indications included twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) (n = 91), selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) (n = 83), severe discordant structural malformation (n = 78), multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) (n = 78), twin reverse arterial perfusion sequence (TRAPS) (n = 19), and twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS) (n = 3). Upon comparison of RFA performed before and after 20 weeks, the co-twin loss rate (20.9% vs. 21.5%), the incidence of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) within 24 h (1.5% vs. 1.2%), and the median gestational age at delivery [35.93 (28–38) weeks vs. 36 (28.54–38.14) weeks] were similar (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RFA is a reasonable option when indicated in multiple pregnancies and complicated monochorionic pregnancies. In our experience, the overall survival rate was 78.76% with RFA in selective feticide, and early treatment increases the likelihood of survival for the remaining fetus because the fetal loss rate is similar before and after 20 weeks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8662893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86628932021-12-13 Selective termination of the fetus in multiple pregnancies using ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation Li, Nan Sun, Jimei Wang, Jiayan Jian, Wei Lu, Jing Miao, Yonghui Li, Yufan Chen, Fei Chen, Dunjin Ye, Xiaoqing Chen, Min BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate the perinatal outcomes in women with selective termination using ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS: Complicated monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies and multiple pregnancies with an indication for selective termination by ultrasound-guided coagulation of the umbilical cord with RFA under local anesthesia between July 2013 and Jan 2020 were reviewed. We analyzed the indications, gestational age at the time of the procedure, cycles of RFA, duration of the procedure, and perinatal outcome. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirteen patients were treated during this period. Seven of whom were lost of follow-up. The remaining 306 cases, including 266 pairs of monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twins (86.93%), two pairs of monoamniotic twins (0.65%), 30 dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) triplets (1%), and three monochorionic triamniotic (MCTA) triplets (0.98%), were analyzed. Indications included twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) (n = 91), selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) (n = 83), severe discordant structural malformation (n = 78), multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) (n = 78), twin reverse arterial perfusion sequence (TRAPS) (n = 19), and twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS) (n = 3). Upon comparison of RFA performed before and after 20 weeks, the co-twin loss rate (20.9% vs. 21.5%), the incidence of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) within 24 h (1.5% vs. 1.2%), and the median gestational age at delivery [35.93 (28–38) weeks vs. 36 (28.54–38.14) weeks] were similar (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: RFA is a reasonable option when indicated in multiple pregnancies and complicated monochorionic pregnancies. In our experience, the overall survival rate was 78.76% with RFA in selective feticide, and early treatment increases the likelihood of survival for the remaining fetus because the fetal loss rate is similar before and after 20 weeks. BioMed Central 2021-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8662893/ /pubmed/34893028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04285-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Li, Nan Sun, Jimei Wang, Jiayan Jian, Wei Lu, Jing Miao, Yonghui Li, Yufan Chen, Fei Chen, Dunjin Ye, Xiaoqing Chen, Min Selective termination of the fetus in multiple pregnancies using ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation |
title | Selective termination of the fetus in multiple pregnancies using ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation |
title_full | Selective termination of the fetus in multiple pregnancies using ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation |
title_fullStr | Selective termination of the fetus in multiple pregnancies using ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation |
title_full_unstemmed | Selective termination of the fetus in multiple pregnancies using ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation |
title_short | Selective termination of the fetus in multiple pregnancies using ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation |
title_sort | selective termination of the fetus in multiple pregnancies using ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8662893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34893028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04285-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linan selectiveterminationofthefetusinmultiplepregnanciesusingultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablation AT sunjimei selectiveterminationofthefetusinmultiplepregnanciesusingultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablation AT wangjiayan selectiveterminationofthefetusinmultiplepregnanciesusingultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablation AT jianwei selectiveterminationofthefetusinmultiplepregnanciesusingultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablation AT lujing selectiveterminationofthefetusinmultiplepregnanciesusingultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablation AT miaoyonghui selectiveterminationofthefetusinmultiplepregnanciesusingultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablation AT liyufan selectiveterminationofthefetusinmultiplepregnanciesusingultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablation AT chenfei selectiveterminationofthefetusinmultiplepregnanciesusingultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablation AT chendunjin selectiveterminationofthefetusinmultiplepregnanciesusingultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablation AT yexiaoqing selectiveterminationofthefetusinmultiplepregnanciesusingultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablation AT chenmin selectiveterminationofthefetusinmultiplepregnanciesusingultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablation |