Cargando…
Frameworks, measures, and interventions for HIV-related internalised stigma and stigma in healthcare and laws and policies: systematic review protocol
INTRODUCTION: There is strong global commitment to eliminate HIV-related stigma. Wide variation exists in frameworks and measures, and many strategies to prevent, reduce or mitigate stigma have been proposed but critical factors determining success or failure remain elusive. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Bu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8663079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34887280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053608 |
_version_ | 1784613559891656704 |
---|---|
author | Hempel, Susanne Ferguson, Laura Bolshakova, Maria Yagyu, Sachi Fu, Ning Motala, Aneesa Gruskin, Sofia |
author_facet | Hempel, Susanne Ferguson, Laura Bolshakova, Maria Yagyu, Sachi Fu, Ning Motala, Aneesa Gruskin, Sofia |
author_sort | Hempel, Susanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There is strong global commitment to eliminate HIV-related stigma. Wide variation exists in frameworks and measures, and many strategies to prevent, reduce or mitigate stigma have been proposed but critical factors determining success or failure remain elusive. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Building on existing knowledge syntheses, we designed a systematic review to identify frameworks, measures and intervention evaluations aiming to address internalised stigma, stigma and discrimination in healthcare, and stigma and discrimination at the legal or policy level. The review addresses four key questions (KQ): KQ1: Which conceptual frameworks have been proposed to assess internal stigma, stigma and discrimination experienced in healthcare settings, and stigma and discrimination entrenched in national laws and policies? KQ2: Which measures of stigma have been proposed and what are their descriptive properties? KQ3: Which interventions have been evaluated that aimed to reduce these types of stigma and discrimination or mitigate their adverse effects and what are the effectiveness and unintended consequences? KQ4: What common ‘critical factors for success or failure’ can be identified across interventions that have been evaluated? We will search PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Universal Human Rights Index, HeinOnline, PAIS, HIV Legal Network, CDSR, Campbell Collaboration, PROSPERO and Open Science Framework. Critical appraisal will assess the source, processes and consensus finding for frameworks; COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments criteria for measures; and risk of bias for interventions. Quality of evidence grading will apply. A gap analysis will provide targeted recommendations for future research. We will establish a compendium of frameworks, a comprehensive catalogue of available measures, and a synthesis of intervention characteristics to advance the science of HIV-related stigma. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021249348. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8663079 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86630792021-12-27 Frameworks, measures, and interventions for HIV-related internalised stigma and stigma in healthcare and laws and policies: systematic review protocol Hempel, Susanne Ferguson, Laura Bolshakova, Maria Yagyu, Sachi Fu, Ning Motala, Aneesa Gruskin, Sofia BMJ Open HIV/AIDS INTRODUCTION: There is strong global commitment to eliminate HIV-related stigma. Wide variation exists in frameworks and measures, and many strategies to prevent, reduce or mitigate stigma have been proposed but critical factors determining success or failure remain elusive. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Building on existing knowledge syntheses, we designed a systematic review to identify frameworks, measures and intervention evaluations aiming to address internalised stigma, stigma and discrimination in healthcare, and stigma and discrimination at the legal or policy level. The review addresses four key questions (KQ): KQ1: Which conceptual frameworks have been proposed to assess internal stigma, stigma and discrimination experienced in healthcare settings, and stigma and discrimination entrenched in national laws and policies? KQ2: Which measures of stigma have been proposed and what are their descriptive properties? KQ3: Which interventions have been evaluated that aimed to reduce these types of stigma and discrimination or mitigate their adverse effects and what are the effectiveness and unintended consequences? KQ4: What common ‘critical factors for success or failure’ can be identified across interventions that have been evaluated? We will search PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Universal Human Rights Index, HeinOnline, PAIS, HIV Legal Network, CDSR, Campbell Collaboration, PROSPERO and Open Science Framework. Critical appraisal will assess the source, processes and consensus finding for frameworks; COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments criteria for measures; and risk of bias for interventions. Quality of evidence grading will apply. A gap analysis will provide targeted recommendations for future research. We will establish a compendium of frameworks, a comprehensive catalogue of available measures, and a synthesis of intervention characteristics to advance the science of HIV-related stigma. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021249348. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8663079/ /pubmed/34887280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053608 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | HIV/AIDS Hempel, Susanne Ferguson, Laura Bolshakova, Maria Yagyu, Sachi Fu, Ning Motala, Aneesa Gruskin, Sofia Frameworks, measures, and interventions for HIV-related internalised stigma and stigma in healthcare and laws and policies: systematic review protocol |
title | Frameworks, measures, and interventions for HIV-related internalised stigma and stigma in healthcare and laws and policies: systematic review protocol |
title_full | Frameworks, measures, and interventions for HIV-related internalised stigma and stigma in healthcare and laws and policies: systematic review protocol |
title_fullStr | Frameworks, measures, and interventions for HIV-related internalised stigma and stigma in healthcare and laws and policies: systematic review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Frameworks, measures, and interventions for HIV-related internalised stigma and stigma in healthcare and laws and policies: systematic review protocol |
title_short | Frameworks, measures, and interventions for HIV-related internalised stigma and stigma in healthcare and laws and policies: systematic review protocol |
title_sort | frameworks, measures, and interventions for hiv-related internalised stigma and stigma in healthcare and laws and policies: systematic review protocol |
topic | HIV/AIDS |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8663079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34887280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053608 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hempelsusanne frameworksmeasuresandinterventionsforhivrelatedinternalisedstigmaandstigmainhealthcareandlawsandpoliciessystematicreviewprotocol AT fergusonlaura frameworksmeasuresandinterventionsforhivrelatedinternalisedstigmaandstigmainhealthcareandlawsandpoliciessystematicreviewprotocol AT bolshakovamaria frameworksmeasuresandinterventionsforhivrelatedinternalisedstigmaandstigmainhealthcareandlawsandpoliciessystematicreviewprotocol AT yagyusachi frameworksmeasuresandinterventionsforhivrelatedinternalisedstigmaandstigmainhealthcareandlawsandpoliciessystematicreviewprotocol AT funing frameworksmeasuresandinterventionsforhivrelatedinternalisedstigmaandstigmainhealthcareandlawsandpoliciessystematicreviewprotocol AT motalaaneesa frameworksmeasuresandinterventionsforhivrelatedinternalisedstigmaandstigmainhealthcareandlawsandpoliciessystematicreviewprotocol AT gruskinsofia frameworksmeasuresandinterventionsforhivrelatedinternalisedstigmaandstigmainhealthcareandlawsandpoliciessystematicreviewprotocol |