Cargando…

Qualitative study of GPs’ views and experiences of population-based preconception expanded carrier screening in the Netherlands: bioethical perspectives

OBJECTIVE: Between 2016 and 2017, a population-based preconception expanded carrier screening (PECS) test was developed in the Netherlands during a pilot study. It was subsequently made possible in mid-2018 for couples to ask to have such a PECS test from specially trained general practitioners (GPs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morberg Jämterud, Sofia, Snoek, Anke, van Langen, I M, Verkerk, Marian, Zeiler, Kristin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8663082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34887284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056869
_version_ 1784613560834326528
author Morberg Jämterud, Sofia
Snoek, Anke
van Langen, I M
Verkerk, Marian
Zeiler, Kristin
author_facet Morberg Jämterud, Sofia
Snoek, Anke
van Langen, I M
Verkerk, Marian
Zeiler, Kristin
author_sort Morberg Jämterud, Sofia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Between 2016 and 2017, a population-based preconception expanded carrier screening (PECS) test was developed in the Netherlands during a pilot study. It was subsequently made possible in mid-2018 for couples to ask to have such a PECS test from specially trained general practitioners (GPs). Research has described GPs as crucial in offering PECS tests, but little is known about the GPs’ views on PECS and their experiences of providing this test. This article presents a thematic analysis of the PECS practice from the perspective of GPs and a bioethical discussion of the empirical results. DESIGN: Empirical bioethics. A thematic analysis of qualitative semi-structured interviews was conducted, and is combined with an ethical/philosophical discussion. SETTING: The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 7 Dutch GPs in the Netherlands, interviewed in 2019–2020. RESULTS: Two themes were identified in the thematic analysis: ‘Choice and its complexity’ and ‘PECS as prompting existential concerns’. The empirical bioethics discussion showed that the first theme highlights that several areas coshape the complexity of choice on PECS, and the need for shared relational autonomous decision-making on these areas within the couple. The second theme highlights that it is not possible to analyse the existential issues raised by PECS solely on the level of the couple or family. A societal level must be included, since these levels affect each other. We refer to this as ‘entangled existential genetics’. CONCLUSION: The empirical bioethical analysis leads us to present two practical implications. These are: (1) training of GPs who are to offer PECS should cover shared relational autonomous decision-making within the couple and (2) more attention should be given to existential issues evoked by genetic considerations, also during the education of GPs and in bioethical discussions around PECS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8663082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86630822021-12-27 Qualitative study of GPs’ views and experiences of population-based preconception expanded carrier screening in the Netherlands: bioethical perspectives Morberg Jämterud, Sofia Snoek, Anke van Langen, I M Verkerk, Marian Zeiler, Kristin BMJ Open Ethics OBJECTIVE: Between 2016 and 2017, a population-based preconception expanded carrier screening (PECS) test was developed in the Netherlands during a pilot study. It was subsequently made possible in mid-2018 for couples to ask to have such a PECS test from specially trained general practitioners (GPs). Research has described GPs as crucial in offering PECS tests, but little is known about the GPs’ views on PECS and their experiences of providing this test. This article presents a thematic analysis of the PECS practice from the perspective of GPs and a bioethical discussion of the empirical results. DESIGN: Empirical bioethics. A thematic analysis of qualitative semi-structured interviews was conducted, and is combined with an ethical/philosophical discussion. SETTING: The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 7 Dutch GPs in the Netherlands, interviewed in 2019–2020. RESULTS: Two themes were identified in the thematic analysis: ‘Choice and its complexity’ and ‘PECS as prompting existential concerns’. The empirical bioethics discussion showed that the first theme highlights that several areas coshape the complexity of choice on PECS, and the need for shared relational autonomous decision-making on these areas within the couple. The second theme highlights that it is not possible to analyse the existential issues raised by PECS solely on the level of the couple or family. A societal level must be included, since these levels affect each other. We refer to this as ‘entangled existential genetics’. CONCLUSION: The empirical bioethical analysis leads us to present two practical implications. These are: (1) training of GPs who are to offer PECS should cover shared relational autonomous decision-making within the couple and (2) more attention should be given to existential issues evoked by genetic considerations, also during the education of GPs and in bioethical discussions around PECS. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8663082/ /pubmed/34887284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056869 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Ethics
Morberg Jämterud, Sofia
Snoek, Anke
van Langen, I M
Verkerk, Marian
Zeiler, Kristin
Qualitative study of GPs’ views and experiences of population-based preconception expanded carrier screening in the Netherlands: bioethical perspectives
title Qualitative study of GPs’ views and experiences of population-based preconception expanded carrier screening in the Netherlands: bioethical perspectives
title_full Qualitative study of GPs’ views and experiences of population-based preconception expanded carrier screening in the Netherlands: bioethical perspectives
title_fullStr Qualitative study of GPs’ views and experiences of population-based preconception expanded carrier screening in the Netherlands: bioethical perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative study of GPs’ views and experiences of population-based preconception expanded carrier screening in the Netherlands: bioethical perspectives
title_short Qualitative study of GPs’ views and experiences of population-based preconception expanded carrier screening in the Netherlands: bioethical perspectives
title_sort qualitative study of gps’ views and experiences of population-based preconception expanded carrier screening in the netherlands: bioethical perspectives
topic Ethics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8663082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34887284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056869
work_keys_str_mv AT morbergjamterudsofia qualitativestudyofgpsviewsandexperiencesofpopulationbasedpreconceptionexpandedcarrierscreeninginthenetherlandsbioethicalperspectives
AT snoekanke qualitativestudyofgpsviewsandexperiencesofpopulationbasedpreconceptionexpandedcarrierscreeninginthenetherlandsbioethicalperspectives
AT vanlangenim qualitativestudyofgpsviewsandexperiencesofpopulationbasedpreconceptionexpandedcarrierscreeninginthenetherlandsbioethicalperspectives
AT verkerkmarian qualitativestudyofgpsviewsandexperiencesofpopulationbasedpreconceptionexpandedcarrierscreeninginthenetherlandsbioethicalperspectives
AT zeilerkristin qualitativestudyofgpsviewsandexperiencesofpopulationbasedpreconceptionexpandedcarrierscreeninginthenetherlandsbioethicalperspectives