Cargando…
Top 10 (plus 1) research priorities for expectant families and those with children to age 24 months in Alberta, Canada: results from the Family Research Agenda Initiative Setting (FRAISE) priority setting partnership project
OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to identify the top 10 research priorities for expectant parents and caregivers of children up to age 24 months. DESIGN: A priority setting partnership using a modified James Lind Alliance approach was implemented. First, a core steering committee was formed, consi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8663105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34887269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047919 |
_version_ | 1784613565165993984 |
---|---|
author | Brockway, Meredith Lee Keys, Elizabeth Bright, Katherine Stuart Ginn, Carla Conlon, Leslie Doane, Stephanie Wilson, Jacqueline Tomfohr-Madsen, Lianne Benzies, Karen |
author_facet | Brockway, Meredith Lee Keys, Elizabeth Bright, Katherine Stuart Ginn, Carla Conlon, Leslie Doane, Stephanie Wilson, Jacqueline Tomfohr-Madsen, Lianne Benzies, Karen |
author_sort | Brockway, Meredith Lee |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to identify the top 10 research priorities for expectant parents and caregivers of children up to age 24 months. DESIGN: A priority setting partnership using a modified James Lind Alliance approach was implemented. First, a core steering committee was formed, consisting of 17 parents, clinicians and community agency representatives. Second, through in-person collaboration with steering committee members, we developed and distributed a survey to identify research priorities across 12 topics. In total, 596 participants consented and 480 completed the survey. Survey responses were grouped and themed into codes during a consensus-building workshop with steering committee members (n=18). Research and practice experts were consulted to provide feedback on which themes had already been researched. An in-person (n=21) workshop was used to establish the top 34 priorities, which were circulated to the broader steering committee (n=25) via an online survey. Finally, the core steering committee members (n=18) met to determine and rank a top 10 (plus 1) list of research priorities. SETTING: This study was conducted in Alberta, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Expectant parents and caregivers of children up to age 24 months. RESULTS: Survey results provided 3232 responses, with 202 unique priorities. After expert feedback and steering committee consensus, a list of 34 priorities was moved forward for final consideration. The final top 10 (plus 1) research priorities included three priorities on mental health/relationships, two priorities on each of access to information, immunity and child development, and one priority on each of sleep, pregnancy/labour and feeding. Selecting 11 instead of 10 priorities was based on steering committee consensus. CONCLUSIONS: The findings will direct future maternal–child research, ensuring it is rooted in parent-identified priorities that represent contemporary needs. To provide meaningful outcomes, research in these priority areas must consider diverse socioeconomic backgrounds and experiences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8663105 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86631052021-12-27 Top 10 (plus 1) research priorities for expectant families and those with children to age 24 months in Alberta, Canada: results from the Family Research Agenda Initiative Setting (FRAISE) priority setting partnership project Brockway, Meredith Lee Keys, Elizabeth Bright, Katherine Stuart Ginn, Carla Conlon, Leslie Doane, Stephanie Wilson, Jacqueline Tomfohr-Madsen, Lianne Benzies, Karen BMJ Open Paediatrics OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to identify the top 10 research priorities for expectant parents and caregivers of children up to age 24 months. DESIGN: A priority setting partnership using a modified James Lind Alliance approach was implemented. First, a core steering committee was formed, consisting of 17 parents, clinicians and community agency representatives. Second, through in-person collaboration with steering committee members, we developed and distributed a survey to identify research priorities across 12 topics. In total, 596 participants consented and 480 completed the survey. Survey responses were grouped and themed into codes during a consensus-building workshop with steering committee members (n=18). Research and practice experts were consulted to provide feedback on which themes had already been researched. An in-person (n=21) workshop was used to establish the top 34 priorities, which were circulated to the broader steering committee (n=25) via an online survey. Finally, the core steering committee members (n=18) met to determine and rank a top 10 (plus 1) list of research priorities. SETTING: This study was conducted in Alberta, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Expectant parents and caregivers of children up to age 24 months. RESULTS: Survey results provided 3232 responses, with 202 unique priorities. After expert feedback and steering committee consensus, a list of 34 priorities was moved forward for final consideration. The final top 10 (plus 1) research priorities included three priorities on mental health/relationships, two priorities on each of access to information, immunity and child development, and one priority on each of sleep, pregnancy/labour and feeding. Selecting 11 instead of 10 priorities was based on steering committee consensus. CONCLUSIONS: The findings will direct future maternal–child research, ensuring it is rooted in parent-identified priorities that represent contemporary needs. To provide meaningful outcomes, research in these priority areas must consider diverse socioeconomic backgrounds and experiences. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8663105/ /pubmed/34887269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047919 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Paediatrics Brockway, Meredith Lee Keys, Elizabeth Bright, Katherine Stuart Ginn, Carla Conlon, Leslie Doane, Stephanie Wilson, Jacqueline Tomfohr-Madsen, Lianne Benzies, Karen Top 10 (plus 1) research priorities for expectant families and those with children to age 24 months in Alberta, Canada: results from the Family Research Agenda Initiative Setting (FRAISE) priority setting partnership project |
title | Top 10 (plus 1) research priorities for expectant families and those with children to age 24 months in Alberta, Canada: results from the Family Research Agenda Initiative Setting (FRAISE) priority setting partnership project |
title_full | Top 10 (plus 1) research priorities for expectant families and those with children to age 24 months in Alberta, Canada: results from the Family Research Agenda Initiative Setting (FRAISE) priority setting partnership project |
title_fullStr | Top 10 (plus 1) research priorities for expectant families and those with children to age 24 months in Alberta, Canada: results from the Family Research Agenda Initiative Setting (FRAISE) priority setting partnership project |
title_full_unstemmed | Top 10 (plus 1) research priorities for expectant families and those with children to age 24 months in Alberta, Canada: results from the Family Research Agenda Initiative Setting (FRAISE) priority setting partnership project |
title_short | Top 10 (plus 1) research priorities for expectant families and those with children to age 24 months in Alberta, Canada: results from the Family Research Agenda Initiative Setting (FRAISE) priority setting partnership project |
title_sort | top 10 (plus 1) research priorities for expectant families and those with children to age 24 months in alberta, canada: results from the family research agenda initiative setting (fraise) priority setting partnership project |
topic | Paediatrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8663105/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34887269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047919 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brockwaymeredithlee top10plus1researchprioritiesforexpectantfamiliesandthosewithchildrentoage24monthsinalbertacanadaresultsfromthefamilyresearchagendainitiativesettingfraiseprioritysettingpartnershipproject AT keyselizabeth top10plus1researchprioritiesforexpectantfamiliesandthosewithchildrentoage24monthsinalbertacanadaresultsfromthefamilyresearchagendainitiativesettingfraiseprioritysettingpartnershipproject AT brightkatherinestuart top10plus1researchprioritiesforexpectantfamiliesandthosewithchildrentoage24monthsinalbertacanadaresultsfromthefamilyresearchagendainitiativesettingfraiseprioritysettingpartnershipproject AT ginncarla top10plus1researchprioritiesforexpectantfamiliesandthosewithchildrentoage24monthsinalbertacanadaresultsfromthefamilyresearchagendainitiativesettingfraiseprioritysettingpartnershipproject AT conlonleslie top10plus1researchprioritiesforexpectantfamiliesandthosewithchildrentoage24monthsinalbertacanadaresultsfromthefamilyresearchagendainitiativesettingfraiseprioritysettingpartnershipproject AT doanestephanie top10plus1researchprioritiesforexpectantfamiliesandthosewithchildrentoage24monthsinalbertacanadaresultsfromthefamilyresearchagendainitiativesettingfraiseprioritysettingpartnershipproject AT wilsonjacqueline top10plus1researchprioritiesforexpectantfamiliesandthosewithchildrentoage24monthsinalbertacanadaresultsfromthefamilyresearchagendainitiativesettingfraiseprioritysettingpartnershipproject AT tomfohrmadsenlianne top10plus1researchprioritiesforexpectantfamiliesandthosewithchildrentoage24monthsinalbertacanadaresultsfromthefamilyresearchagendainitiativesettingfraiseprioritysettingpartnershipproject AT benzieskaren top10plus1researchprioritiesforexpectantfamiliesandthosewithchildrentoage24monthsinalbertacanadaresultsfromthefamilyresearchagendainitiativesettingfraiseprioritysettingpartnershipproject |