Cargando…

Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Detection: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: Skin cancer is the most common cancer type affecting humans. Traditional skin cancer diagnosis methods are costly, require a professional physician, and take time. Hence, to aid in diagnosing skin cancer, artificial intelligence (AI) tools are being used, including shallow and deep machi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takiddin, Abdulrahman, Schneider, Jens, Yang, Yin, Abd-Alrazaq, Alaa, Househ, Mowafa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8663507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34821566
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/22934
_version_ 1784613653059731456
author Takiddin, Abdulrahman
Schneider, Jens
Yang, Yin
Abd-Alrazaq, Alaa
Househ, Mowafa
author_facet Takiddin, Abdulrahman
Schneider, Jens
Yang, Yin
Abd-Alrazaq, Alaa
Househ, Mowafa
author_sort Takiddin, Abdulrahman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Skin cancer is the most common cancer type affecting humans. Traditional skin cancer diagnosis methods are costly, require a professional physician, and take time. Hence, to aid in diagnosing skin cancer, artificial intelligence (AI) tools are being used, including shallow and deep machine learning–based methodologies that are trained to detect and classify skin cancer using computer algorithms and deep neural networks. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify and group the different types of AI-based technologies used to detect and classify skin cancer. The study also examined the reliability of the selected papers by studying the correlation between the data set size and the number of diagnostic classes with the performance metrics used to evaluate the models. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search for papers using Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore, Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library (ACM DL), and Ovid MEDLINE databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. The studies included in this scoping review had to fulfill several selection criteria: being specifically about skin cancer, detecting or classifying skin cancer, and using AI technologies. Study selection and data extraction were independently conducted by two reviewers. Extracted data were narratively synthesized, where studies were grouped based on the diagnostic AI techniques and their evaluation metrics. RESULTS: We retrieved 906 papers from the 3 databases, of which 53 were eligible for this review. Shallow AI-based techniques were used in 14 studies, and deep AI-based techniques were used in 39 studies. The studies used up to 11 evaluation metrics to assess the proposed models, where 39 studies used accuracy as the primary evaluation metric. Overall, studies that used smaller data sets reported higher accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: This paper examined multiple AI-based skin cancer detection models. However, a direct comparison between methods was hindered by the varied use of different evaluation metrics and image types. Performance scores were affected by factors such as data set size, number of diagnostic classes, and techniques. Hence, the reliability of shallow and deep models with higher accuracy scores was questionable since they were trained and tested on relatively small data sets of a few diagnostic classes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8663507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86635072022-01-05 Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Detection: Scoping Review Takiddin, Abdulrahman Schneider, Jens Yang, Yin Abd-Alrazaq, Alaa Househ, Mowafa J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Skin cancer is the most common cancer type affecting humans. Traditional skin cancer diagnosis methods are costly, require a professional physician, and take time. Hence, to aid in diagnosing skin cancer, artificial intelligence (AI) tools are being used, including shallow and deep machine learning–based methodologies that are trained to detect and classify skin cancer using computer algorithms and deep neural networks. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify and group the different types of AI-based technologies used to detect and classify skin cancer. The study also examined the reliability of the selected papers by studying the correlation between the data set size and the number of diagnostic classes with the performance metrics used to evaluate the models. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search for papers using Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore, Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library (ACM DL), and Ovid MEDLINE databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. The studies included in this scoping review had to fulfill several selection criteria: being specifically about skin cancer, detecting or classifying skin cancer, and using AI technologies. Study selection and data extraction were independently conducted by two reviewers. Extracted data were narratively synthesized, where studies were grouped based on the diagnostic AI techniques and their evaluation metrics. RESULTS: We retrieved 906 papers from the 3 databases, of which 53 were eligible for this review. Shallow AI-based techniques were used in 14 studies, and deep AI-based techniques were used in 39 studies. The studies used up to 11 evaluation metrics to assess the proposed models, where 39 studies used accuracy as the primary evaluation metric. Overall, studies that used smaller data sets reported higher accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: This paper examined multiple AI-based skin cancer detection models. However, a direct comparison between methods was hindered by the varied use of different evaluation metrics and image types. Performance scores were affected by factors such as data set size, number of diagnostic classes, and techniques. Hence, the reliability of shallow and deep models with higher accuracy scores was questionable since they were trained and tested on relatively small data sets of a few diagnostic classes. JMIR Publications 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8663507/ /pubmed/34821566 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/22934 Text en ©Abdulrahman Takiddin, Jens Schneider, Yin Yang, Alaa Abd-Alrazaq, Mowafa Househ. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 24.11.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Takiddin, Abdulrahman
Schneider, Jens
Yang, Yin
Abd-Alrazaq, Alaa
Househ, Mowafa
Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Detection: Scoping Review
title Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Detection: Scoping Review
title_full Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Detection: Scoping Review
title_fullStr Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Detection: Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Detection: Scoping Review
title_short Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Detection: Scoping Review
title_sort artificial intelligence for skin cancer detection: scoping review
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8663507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34821566
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/22934
work_keys_str_mv AT takiddinabdulrahman artificialintelligenceforskincancerdetectionscopingreview
AT schneiderjens artificialintelligenceforskincancerdetectionscopingreview
AT yangyin artificialintelligenceforskincancerdetectionscopingreview
AT abdalrazaqalaa artificialintelligenceforskincancerdetectionscopingreview
AT househmowafa artificialintelligenceforskincancerdetectionscopingreview