Cargando…

Understanding the Relationship Between Official and Social Information About Infectious Disease: Experimental Analysis

BACKGROUND: Communicating official public health information about infectious diseases is complicated by the fact that individuals receive much of their information from their social contacts, either via interpersonal interaction or social media, which can be prone to bias and misconception. OBJECTI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Assaf, Elias, Bond, Robert M, Cranmer, Skyler J, Kaizar, Eloise E, Ratliff Santoro, Lauren, Shikano, Susumu, Sivakoff, David J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8663576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34817389
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25287
_version_ 1784613669813878784
author Assaf, Elias
Bond, Robert M
Cranmer, Skyler J
Kaizar, Eloise E
Ratliff Santoro, Lauren
Shikano, Susumu
Sivakoff, David J
author_facet Assaf, Elias
Bond, Robert M
Cranmer, Skyler J
Kaizar, Eloise E
Ratliff Santoro, Lauren
Shikano, Susumu
Sivakoff, David J
author_sort Assaf, Elias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Communicating official public health information about infectious diseases is complicated by the fact that individuals receive much of their information from their social contacts, either via interpersonal interaction or social media, which can be prone to bias and misconception. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effect of public health campaigns and the effect of socially communicated health information on learning about diseases simultaneously. Although extant literature addresses the effect of one source of information (official or social) or the other, it has not addressed the simultaneous interaction of official information (OI) and social information (SI) in an experimental setting. METHODS: We used a series of experiments that exposed participants to both OI and structured SI about the symptoms and spread of hepatitis C over a series of 10 rounds of computer-based interactions. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a high, low, or control intensity of OI and to receive accurate or inaccurate SI about the disease. RESULTS: A total of 195 participants consented to participate in the study. Of these respondents, 186 had complete responses across all ten experimental rounds, which corresponds to a 4.6% (9/195) nonresponse rate. The OI high intensity treatment increases learning over the control condition for all symptom and contagion questions when individuals have lower levels of baseline knowledge (all P values ≤.04). The accurate SI condition increased learning across experimental rounds over the inaccurate condition (all P values ≤.01). We find limited evidence of an interaction between official and SI about infectious diseases. CONCLUSIONS: This project demonstrates that exposure to official public health information increases individuals’ knowledge of the spread and symptoms of a disease. Socially shared information also facilitates the learning of accurate and inaccurate information, though to a lesser extent than exposure to OI. Although the effect of OI persists, preliminary results suggest that it can be degraded by persistent contradictory SI over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8663576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86635762022-01-05 Understanding the Relationship Between Official and Social Information About Infectious Disease: Experimental Analysis Assaf, Elias Bond, Robert M Cranmer, Skyler J Kaizar, Eloise E Ratliff Santoro, Lauren Shikano, Susumu Sivakoff, David J J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Communicating official public health information about infectious diseases is complicated by the fact that individuals receive much of their information from their social contacts, either via interpersonal interaction or social media, which can be prone to bias and misconception. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effect of public health campaigns and the effect of socially communicated health information on learning about diseases simultaneously. Although extant literature addresses the effect of one source of information (official or social) or the other, it has not addressed the simultaneous interaction of official information (OI) and social information (SI) in an experimental setting. METHODS: We used a series of experiments that exposed participants to both OI and structured SI about the symptoms and spread of hepatitis C over a series of 10 rounds of computer-based interactions. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a high, low, or control intensity of OI and to receive accurate or inaccurate SI about the disease. RESULTS: A total of 195 participants consented to participate in the study. Of these respondents, 186 had complete responses across all ten experimental rounds, which corresponds to a 4.6% (9/195) nonresponse rate. The OI high intensity treatment increases learning over the control condition for all symptom and contagion questions when individuals have lower levels of baseline knowledge (all P values ≤.04). The accurate SI condition increased learning across experimental rounds over the inaccurate condition (all P values ≤.01). We find limited evidence of an interaction between official and SI about infectious diseases. CONCLUSIONS: This project demonstrates that exposure to official public health information increases individuals’ knowledge of the spread and symptoms of a disease. Socially shared information also facilitates the learning of accurate and inaccurate information, though to a lesser extent than exposure to OI. Although the effect of OI persists, preliminary results suggest that it can be degraded by persistent contradictory SI over time. JMIR Publications 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8663576/ /pubmed/34817389 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25287 Text en ©Elias Assaf, Robert M Bond, Skyler J Cranmer, Eloise E Kaizar, Lauren Ratliff Santoro, Susumu Shikano, David J Sivakoff. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 23.11.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Assaf, Elias
Bond, Robert M
Cranmer, Skyler J
Kaizar, Eloise E
Ratliff Santoro, Lauren
Shikano, Susumu
Sivakoff, David J
Understanding the Relationship Between Official and Social Information About Infectious Disease: Experimental Analysis
title Understanding the Relationship Between Official and Social Information About Infectious Disease: Experimental Analysis
title_full Understanding the Relationship Between Official and Social Information About Infectious Disease: Experimental Analysis
title_fullStr Understanding the Relationship Between Official and Social Information About Infectious Disease: Experimental Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the Relationship Between Official and Social Information About Infectious Disease: Experimental Analysis
title_short Understanding the Relationship Between Official and Social Information About Infectious Disease: Experimental Analysis
title_sort understanding the relationship between official and social information about infectious disease: experimental analysis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8663576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34817389
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25287
work_keys_str_mv AT assafelias understandingtherelationshipbetweenofficialandsocialinformationaboutinfectiousdiseaseexperimentalanalysis
AT bondrobertm understandingtherelationshipbetweenofficialandsocialinformationaboutinfectiousdiseaseexperimentalanalysis
AT cranmerskylerj understandingtherelationshipbetweenofficialandsocialinformationaboutinfectiousdiseaseexperimentalanalysis
AT kaizareloisee understandingtherelationshipbetweenofficialandsocialinformationaboutinfectiousdiseaseexperimentalanalysis
AT ratliffsantorolauren understandingtherelationshipbetweenofficialandsocialinformationaboutinfectiousdiseaseexperimentalanalysis
AT shikanosusumu understandingtherelationshipbetweenofficialandsocialinformationaboutinfectiousdiseaseexperimentalanalysis
AT sivakoffdavidj understandingtherelationshipbetweenofficialandsocialinformationaboutinfectiousdiseaseexperimentalanalysis