Cargando…

The Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Electronic Discharge Readiness Tool: Prospective, Single-Center, Pre-Post Study

BACKGROUND: In the face of hospital capacity strain, hospitals have developed multifaceted plans to try to improve patient flow. Many of these initiatives have focused on the timing of discharges and on lowering lengths of stay, and they have met with variable success. We deployed a novel tool in th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keniston, Angela, McBeth, Lauren, Pell, Jonathan, Bowden, Kasey, Metzger, Anna, Nordhagen, Jamie, Anthony, Amanda, Rice, John, Burden, Marisha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8663627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34747702
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27568
_version_ 1784613681859919872
author Keniston, Angela
McBeth, Lauren
Pell, Jonathan
Bowden, Kasey
Metzger, Anna
Nordhagen, Jamie
Anthony, Amanda
Rice, John
Burden, Marisha
author_facet Keniston, Angela
McBeth, Lauren
Pell, Jonathan
Bowden, Kasey
Metzger, Anna
Nordhagen, Jamie
Anthony, Amanda
Rice, John
Burden, Marisha
author_sort Keniston, Angela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the face of hospital capacity strain, hospitals have developed multifaceted plans to try to improve patient flow. Many of these initiatives have focused on the timing of discharges and on lowering lengths of stay, and they have met with variable success. We deployed a novel tool in the electronic health record to enhance discharge communication. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a discharge communication tool. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, pre-post study. Hospitalist physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs) used the Discharge Today Tool to update patient discharge readiness every morning and at any time the patient status changed throughout the day. Primary outcomes were tool use, time of day the clinician entered the discharge order, time of day the patient left the hospital, and hospital length of stay. We used linear mixed modeling and generalized linear mixed modeling, with team and discharging provider included in all the models to account for patients cared for by the same team and the same provider. RESULTS: During the pilot implementation period from March 5, 2019, to July 31, 2019, a total of 4707 patients were discharged (compared with 4558 patients discharged during the preimplementation period). A total of 352 clinical staff had used the tool, and 84.85% (3994/4707) of the patients during the pilot period had a discharge status assigned at least once. In a survey, most respondents reported that the tool was helpful (32/34, 94% of clinical staff) and either saved time or did not add additional time to their workflow (21/24, 88% of providers, and 34/34, 100% of clinical staff). Although improvements were not observed in either unadjusted or adjusted analyses, after including starting morning census per team as an effect modifier, there was a reduction in the time of day the discharge order was entered into the electronic health record by the discharging physician and in the time of day the patient left the hospital (decrease of 2.9 minutes per additional patient, P=.07, and 3 minutes per additional patient, P=.07, respectively). As an effect modifier, for teams that included an APP, there was a significant reduction in the time of day the patient left the hospital beyond the reduction seen for teams without an APP (decrease of 19.1 minutes per patient, P=.04). Finally, in the adjusted analysis, hospital length of stay decreased by an average of 3.7% (P=.06). CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Today tool allows for real time documentation and sharing of discharge status. Our results suggest an overall positive response by care team members and that the tool may be useful for improving discharge time and length of stay if a team is staffed with an APP or in higher-census situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8663627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86636272022-01-05 The Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Electronic Discharge Readiness Tool: Prospective, Single-Center, Pre-Post Study Keniston, Angela McBeth, Lauren Pell, Jonathan Bowden, Kasey Metzger, Anna Nordhagen, Jamie Anthony, Amanda Rice, John Burden, Marisha JMIR Hum Factors Original Paper BACKGROUND: In the face of hospital capacity strain, hospitals have developed multifaceted plans to try to improve patient flow. Many of these initiatives have focused on the timing of discharges and on lowering lengths of stay, and they have met with variable success. We deployed a novel tool in the electronic health record to enhance discharge communication. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a discharge communication tool. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, pre-post study. Hospitalist physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs) used the Discharge Today Tool to update patient discharge readiness every morning and at any time the patient status changed throughout the day. Primary outcomes were tool use, time of day the clinician entered the discharge order, time of day the patient left the hospital, and hospital length of stay. We used linear mixed modeling and generalized linear mixed modeling, with team and discharging provider included in all the models to account for patients cared for by the same team and the same provider. RESULTS: During the pilot implementation period from March 5, 2019, to July 31, 2019, a total of 4707 patients were discharged (compared with 4558 patients discharged during the preimplementation period). A total of 352 clinical staff had used the tool, and 84.85% (3994/4707) of the patients during the pilot period had a discharge status assigned at least once. In a survey, most respondents reported that the tool was helpful (32/34, 94% of clinical staff) and either saved time or did not add additional time to their workflow (21/24, 88% of providers, and 34/34, 100% of clinical staff). Although improvements were not observed in either unadjusted or adjusted analyses, after including starting morning census per team as an effect modifier, there was a reduction in the time of day the discharge order was entered into the electronic health record by the discharging physician and in the time of day the patient left the hospital (decrease of 2.9 minutes per additional patient, P=.07, and 3 minutes per additional patient, P=.07, respectively). As an effect modifier, for teams that included an APP, there was a significant reduction in the time of day the patient left the hospital beyond the reduction seen for teams without an APP (decrease of 19.1 minutes per patient, P=.04). Finally, in the adjusted analysis, hospital length of stay decreased by an average of 3.7% (P=.06). CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Today tool allows for real time documentation and sharing of discharge status. Our results suggest an overall positive response by care team members and that the tool may be useful for improving discharge time and length of stay if a team is staffed with an APP or in higher-census situations. JMIR Publications 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8663627/ /pubmed/34747702 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27568 Text en ©Angela Keniston, Lauren McBeth, Jonathan Pell, Kasey Bowden, Anna Metzger, Jamie Nordhagen, Amanda Anthony, John Rice, Marisha Burden. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 08.11.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Human Factors, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://humanfactors.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Keniston, Angela
McBeth, Lauren
Pell, Jonathan
Bowden, Kasey
Metzger, Anna
Nordhagen, Jamie
Anthony, Amanda
Rice, John
Burden, Marisha
The Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Electronic Discharge Readiness Tool: Prospective, Single-Center, Pre-Post Study
title The Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Electronic Discharge Readiness Tool: Prospective, Single-Center, Pre-Post Study
title_full The Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Electronic Discharge Readiness Tool: Prospective, Single-Center, Pre-Post Study
title_fullStr The Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Electronic Discharge Readiness Tool: Prospective, Single-Center, Pre-Post Study
title_full_unstemmed The Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Electronic Discharge Readiness Tool: Prospective, Single-Center, Pre-Post Study
title_short The Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Electronic Discharge Readiness Tool: Prospective, Single-Center, Pre-Post Study
title_sort effectiveness of a multidisciplinary electronic discharge readiness tool: prospective, single-center, pre-post study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8663627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34747702
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27568
work_keys_str_mv AT kenistonangela theeffectivenessofamultidisciplinaryelectronicdischargereadinesstoolprospectivesinglecenterprepoststudy
AT mcbethlauren theeffectivenessofamultidisciplinaryelectronicdischargereadinesstoolprospectivesinglecenterprepoststudy
AT pelljonathan theeffectivenessofamultidisciplinaryelectronicdischargereadinesstoolprospectivesinglecenterprepoststudy
AT bowdenkasey theeffectivenessofamultidisciplinaryelectronicdischargereadinesstoolprospectivesinglecenterprepoststudy
AT metzgeranna theeffectivenessofamultidisciplinaryelectronicdischargereadinesstoolprospectivesinglecenterprepoststudy
AT nordhagenjamie theeffectivenessofamultidisciplinaryelectronicdischargereadinesstoolprospectivesinglecenterprepoststudy
AT anthonyamanda theeffectivenessofamultidisciplinaryelectronicdischargereadinesstoolprospectivesinglecenterprepoststudy
AT ricejohn theeffectivenessofamultidisciplinaryelectronicdischargereadinesstoolprospectivesinglecenterprepoststudy
AT burdenmarisha theeffectivenessofamultidisciplinaryelectronicdischargereadinesstoolprospectivesinglecenterprepoststudy
AT kenistonangela effectivenessofamultidisciplinaryelectronicdischargereadinesstoolprospectivesinglecenterprepoststudy
AT mcbethlauren effectivenessofamultidisciplinaryelectronicdischargereadinesstoolprospectivesinglecenterprepoststudy
AT pelljonathan effectivenessofamultidisciplinaryelectronicdischargereadinesstoolprospectivesinglecenterprepoststudy
AT bowdenkasey effectivenessofamultidisciplinaryelectronicdischargereadinesstoolprospectivesinglecenterprepoststudy
AT metzgeranna effectivenessofamultidisciplinaryelectronicdischargereadinesstoolprospectivesinglecenterprepoststudy
AT nordhagenjamie effectivenessofamultidisciplinaryelectronicdischargereadinesstoolprospectivesinglecenterprepoststudy
AT anthonyamanda effectivenessofamultidisciplinaryelectronicdischargereadinesstoolprospectivesinglecenterprepoststudy
AT ricejohn effectivenessofamultidisciplinaryelectronicdischargereadinesstoolprospectivesinglecenterprepoststudy
AT burdenmarisha effectivenessofamultidisciplinaryelectronicdischargereadinesstoolprospectivesinglecenterprepoststudy