Cargando…

Outcomes of Digital Biomarker–Based Interventions: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

BACKGROUND: Digital biomarkers are defined as objective, quantifiable, physiological, and behavioral data that are collected and measured using digital devices such as portables, wearables, implantables, or digestibles. For their widespread adoption in publicly financed health care systems, it is im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Motahari-Nezhad, Hossein, Péntek, Márta, Gulácsi, László, Zrubka, Zsombor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8663678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34821568
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28204
_version_ 1784613694380965888
author Motahari-Nezhad, Hossein
Péntek, Márta
Gulácsi, László
Zrubka, Zsombor
author_facet Motahari-Nezhad, Hossein
Péntek, Márta
Gulácsi, László
Zrubka, Zsombor
author_sort Motahari-Nezhad, Hossein
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Digital biomarkers are defined as objective, quantifiable, physiological, and behavioral data that are collected and measured using digital devices such as portables, wearables, implantables, or digestibles. For their widespread adoption in publicly financed health care systems, it is important to understand how their benefits translate into improved patient outcomes, which is essential for demonstrating their value. OBJECTIVE: The paper presents the protocol for a systematic review that aims to assess the quality and strength of the evidence reported in systematic reviews regarding the impact of digital biomarkers on clinical outcomes compared to interventions without digital biomarkers. METHODS: A comprehensive search for reviews from 2019 to 2020 will be conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library using keywords related to digital biomarkers and a filter for systematic reviews. Original full-text English publications of systematic reviews comparing clinical outcomes of interventions with and without digital biomarkers via meta-analysis will be included. The AMSTAR-2 tool will be used to assess the methodological quality of these reviews. To assess the quality of evidence, we will evaluate the systematic reviews using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. To detect the possible presence of reporting bias, we will determine whether a protocol was published prior to the start of the studies. A qualitative summary of the results by digital biomarker technology and outcomes will be provided. RESULTS: This protocol was submitted before data collection. Search, screening, and data extraction will commence in December 2021 in accordance with the published protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Our study will provide a comprehensive summary of the highest level of evidence available on digital biomarker interventions, providing practical guidance for health care providers. Our results will help identify clinical areas in which the use of digital biomarkers has led to favorable clinical outcomes. In addition, our findings will highlight areas of evidence gaps where the clinical benefits of digital biomarkers have not yet been demonstrated. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/28204
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8663678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86636782021-12-30 Outcomes of Digital Biomarker–Based Interventions: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews Motahari-Nezhad, Hossein Péntek, Márta Gulácsi, László Zrubka, Zsombor JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Digital biomarkers are defined as objective, quantifiable, physiological, and behavioral data that are collected and measured using digital devices such as portables, wearables, implantables, or digestibles. For their widespread adoption in publicly financed health care systems, it is important to understand how their benefits translate into improved patient outcomes, which is essential for demonstrating their value. OBJECTIVE: The paper presents the protocol for a systematic review that aims to assess the quality and strength of the evidence reported in systematic reviews regarding the impact of digital biomarkers on clinical outcomes compared to interventions without digital biomarkers. METHODS: A comprehensive search for reviews from 2019 to 2020 will be conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Library using keywords related to digital biomarkers and a filter for systematic reviews. Original full-text English publications of systematic reviews comparing clinical outcomes of interventions with and without digital biomarkers via meta-analysis will be included. The AMSTAR-2 tool will be used to assess the methodological quality of these reviews. To assess the quality of evidence, we will evaluate the systematic reviews using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. To detect the possible presence of reporting bias, we will determine whether a protocol was published prior to the start of the studies. A qualitative summary of the results by digital biomarker technology and outcomes will be provided. RESULTS: This protocol was submitted before data collection. Search, screening, and data extraction will commence in December 2021 in accordance with the published protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Our study will provide a comprehensive summary of the highest level of evidence available on digital biomarker interventions, providing practical guidance for health care providers. Our results will help identify clinical areas in which the use of digital biomarkers has led to favorable clinical outcomes. In addition, our findings will highlight areas of evidence gaps where the clinical benefits of digital biomarkers have not yet been demonstrated. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/28204 JMIR Publications 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8663678/ /pubmed/34821568 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28204 Text en ©Hossein Motahari-Nezhad, Márta Péntek, László Gulácsi, Zsombor Zrubka. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 24.11.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Motahari-Nezhad, Hossein
Péntek, Márta
Gulácsi, László
Zrubka, Zsombor
Outcomes of Digital Biomarker–Based Interventions: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
title Outcomes of Digital Biomarker–Based Interventions: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
title_full Outcomes of Digital Biomarker–Based Interventions: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
title_fullStr Outcomes of Digital Biomarker–Based Interventions: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Digital Biomarker–Based Interventions: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
title_short Outcomes of Digital Biomarker–Based Interventions: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews
title_sort outcomes of digital biomarker–based interventions: protocol for a systematic review of systematic reviews
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8663678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34821568
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/28204
work_keys_str_mv AT motaharinezhadhossein outcomesofdigitalbiomarkerbasedinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT pentekmarta outcomesofdigitalbiomarkerbasedinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT gulacsilaszlo outcomesofdigitalbiomarkerbasedinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews
AT zrubkazsombor outcomesofdigitalbiomarkerbasedinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewofsystematicreviews