Cargando…

Teleguidance Technology for Endotracheal Intubation: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES: Teleguidance facilitated intubation has recently reemerged during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic as a strategy to provide expert airway management guidance and consultation to practitioners in settings where such expertise is not readily available onsite or in-person. We conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levin, Benjamin S., Chang, Marvin G., Bittner, Edward A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8663862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34909695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000582
_version_ 1784613736065007616
author Levin, Benjamin S.
Chang, Marvin G.
Bittner, Edward A.
author_facet Levin, Benjamin S.
Chang, Marvin G.
Bittner, Edward A.
author_sort Levin, Benjamin S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Teleguidance facilitated intubation has recently reemerged during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic as a strategy to provide expert airway management guidance and consultation to practitioners in settings where such expertise is not readily available onsite or in-person. We conducted a scoping review to provide a synthesis of the available literature on teleguidance facilitated intubation. Specifically, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of teleguidance facilitated intubation given existing technology. DATA SOURCES: A librarian-assisted search was performed using three primary electronic medical databases from January 2000 to November 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Articles that reported outcomes focused on implementing or evaluating the performance of teleguidance facilitated intubation were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full text of articles to determine eligibility. Data extraction was performed using customized fields established a priori within a systematic review software system. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 255 citations identified, 17 met eligibility criteria. Studies included prospective investigations and proof of technology reports. These studies were performed in clinical and simulation environments. Five of the prospective investigations that examined time to intubation and intubation success rates. Multiple different commercially available and noncommercial teleconference software systems were used in these studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is a limited body of literature evaluating the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of teleguidance facilitated intubation. Based on the studies available that examined a variety of technologies within simulation and clinical environments, teleguidance facilitated intubation appears to be feasible, safe, and efficacious. Given the exponential growth in the use of telemedicine technology during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and the evidence supporting teleguidance facilitated intubation, there is a need to critically evaluate the most effective mechanisms to integrate and optimize these technologies across diverse practice settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8663862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86638622021-12-13 Teleguidance Technology for Endotracheal Intubation: A Scoping Review Levin, Benjamin S. Chang, Marvin G. Bittner, Edward A. Crit Care Explor Review Article OBJECTIVES: Teleguidance facilitated intubation has recently reemerged during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic as a strategy to provide expert airway management guidance and consultation to practitioners in settings where such expertise is not readily available onsite or in-person. We conducted a scoping review to provide a synthesis of the available literature on teleguidance facilitated intubation. Specifically, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of teleguidance facilitated intubation given existing technology. DATA SOURCES: A librarian-assisted search was performed using three primary electronic medical databases from January 2000 to November 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Articles that reported outcomes focused on implementing or evaluating the performance of teleguidance facilitated intubation were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full text of articles to determine eligibility. Data extraction was performed using customized fields established a priori within a systematic review software system. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 255 citations identified, 17 met eligibility criteria. Studies included prospective investigations and proof of technology reports. These studies were performed in clinical and simulation environments. Five of the prospective investigations that examined time to intubation and intubation success rates. Multiple different commercially available and noncommercial teleconference software systems were used in these studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is a limited body of literature evaluating the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of teleguidance facilitated intubation. Based on the studies available that examined a variety of technologies within simulation and clinical environments, teleguidance facilitated intubation appears to be feasible, safe, and efficacious. Given the exponential growth in the use of telemedicine technology during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and the evidence supporting teleguidance facilitated intubation, there is a need to critically evaluate the most effective mechanisms to integrate and optimize these technologies across diverse practice settings. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8663862/ /pubmed/34909695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000582 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Review Article
Levin, Benjamin S.
Chang, Marvin G.
Bittner, Edward A.
Teleguidance Technology for Endotracheal Intubation: A Scoping Review
title Teleguidance Technology for Endotracheal Intubation: A Scoping Review
title_full Teleguidance Technology for Endotracheal Intubation: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Teleguidance Technology for Endotracheal Intubation: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Teleguidance Technology for Endotracheal Intubation: A Scoping Review
title_short Teleguidance Technology for Endotracheal Intubation: A Scoping Review
title_sort teleguidance technology for endotracheal intubation: a scoping review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8663862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34909695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000582
work_keys_str_mv AT levinbenjamins teleguidancetechnologyforendotrachealintubationascopingreview
AT changmarving teleguidancetechnologyforendotrachealintubationascopingreview
AT bittneredwarda teleguidancetechnologyforendotrachealintubationascopingreview