The influence of outdoor PM(2.5) concentration at workplace on nonaccidental mortality estimates in a Canadian census-based cohort

BACKGROUND: Associations between mortality and exposure to ambient air pollution are usually explored using concentrations of residential outdoor fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) to estimate individual exposure. Such studies all have an important limitation in that they do not capture data on individual mobility throughout the day to areas where concentrations may be substantially different, leading to possible exposure misclassification. We examine the possible role of outdoor PM(2.5) concentrations at work for a large population-based mortality cohort. METHODS: Using the 2001 Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohort (CanCHEC), we created a time-weighted average that incorporates employment hours worked in the past week and outdoor PM(2.5) concentration at work and home. We used a Cox proportional hazard model with a 15-year follow-up (2001 to 2016) to explore whether inclusion of workplace estimates had an impact on hazard ratios for mortality for this cohort. RESULTS: Hazard ratios relying on outdoor PM(2.5) concentration at home were not significantly different from those using a time-weighted estimate, for the full cohort, nor for those who commute to a regular workplace. When exploring cohort subgroups according to neighborhood type and commute distance, there was a notable but insignificant change in risk of nonaccidental death for those living in car-oriented neighborhoods, and with commutes greater than 10 km. CONCLUSIONS: Risk analyses performed with large cohorts in low-pollution environments do not seem to be biased if relying solely on outdoor PM(2.5) concentrations at home to estimate exposure.