Cargando…

A system for equitable workload distribution in clinical medical physics

BACKGROUND: Clinical medical physics duties include routine tasks, special procedures, and development projects. It can be challenging to distribute the effort equitably across all team members, especially in large clinics or systems where physicists cover multiple sites. The purpose of this work is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Minsun, Ford, Eric, Smith, Wade, Bowen, Stephen R., Geneser, Sarah, Meyer, Juergen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8664136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34697863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13460
_version_ 1784613782706716672
author Kim, Minsun
Ford, Eric
Smith, Wade
Bowen, Stephen R.
Geneser, Sarah
Meyer, Juergen
author_facet Kim, Minsun
Ford, Eric
Smith, Wade
Bowen, Stephen R.
Geneser, Sarah
Meyer, Juergen
author_sort Kim, Minsun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical medical physics duties include routine tasks, special procedures, and development projects. It can be challenging to distribute the effort equitably across all team members, especially in large clinics or systems where physicists cover multiple sites. The purpose of this work is to study an equitable workload distribution system in radiotherapy physics that addresses the complex and dynamic nature of effort assignment. METHODS: We formed a working group that defined all relevant clinical tasks and estimated the total time spent per task. Estimates used data from the oncology information system, a survey of physicists, and group consensus. We introduced a quantitative workload unit, “equivalent workday” (eWD), as a common unit for effort. The sum of all eWD values adjusted for each physicist's clinical full‐time equivalent yields a “normalized total effort” (nTE) metric for each physicist, that is, the fraction of the total effort assigned to that physicist. We implemented this system in clinical operation. During a trial period of 9 months, we made adjustments to include tasks previously unaccounted for and refined the system. The workload distribution of eight physicists over 12 months was compared before and after implementation of the nTE system. RESULTS: Prior to implementation, differences in workload of up to 50% existed between individual physicists (nTE range of 10.0%–15.0%). During the trial period, additional categories were added to account for leave and clinical projects that had previously been assigned informally. In the 1‐year period after implementation, the individual workload differences were within 5% (nTE range of 12.3%–12.8%). CONCLUSION: We developed a system to equitably distribute workload and demonstrated improvements in the equity of workload. A quantitative approach to workload distribution improves both transparency and accountability. While the system was motivated by the complexities within an academic medical center, it may be generally applicable for other clinics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8664136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86641362021-12-21 A system for equitable workload distribution in clinical medical physics Kim, Minsun Ford, Eric Smith, Wade Bowen, Stephen R. Geneser, Sarah Meyer, Juergen J Appl Clin Med Phys Management and Profession BACKGROUND: Clinical medical physics duties include routine tasks, special procedures, and development projects. It can be challenging to distribute the effort equitably across all team members, especially in large clinics or systems where physicists cover multiple sites. The purpose of this work is to study an equitable workload distribution system in radiotherapy physics that addresses the complex and dynamic nature of effort assignment. METHODS: We formed a working group that defined all relevant clinical tasks and estimated the total time spent per task. Estimates used data from the oncology information system, a survey of physicists, and group consensus. We introduced a quantitative workload unit, “equivalent workday” (eWD), as a common unit for effort. The sum of all eWD values adjusted for each physicist's clinical full‐time equivalent yields a “normalized total effort” (nTE) metric for each physicist, that is, the fraction of the total effort assigned to that physicist. We implemented this system in clinical operation. During a trial period of 9 months, we made adjustments to include tasks previously unaccounted for and refined the system. The workload distribution of eight physicists over 12 months was compared before and after implementation of the nTE system. RESULTS: Prior to implementation, differences in workload of up to 50% existed between individual physicists (nTE range of 10.0%–15.0%). During the trial period, additional categories were added to account for leave and clinical projects that had previously been assigned informally. In the 1‐year period after implementation, the individual workload differences were within 5% (nTE range of 12.3%–12.8%). CONCLUSION: We developed a system to equitably distribute workload and demonstrated improvements in the equity of workload. A quantitative approach to workload distribution improves both transparency and accountability. While the system was motivated by the complexities within an academic medical center, it may be generally applicable for other clinics. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8664136/ /pubmed/34697863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13460 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Management and Profession
Kim, Minsun
Ford, Eric
Smith, Wade
Bowen, Stephen R.
Geneser, Sarah
Meyer, Juergen
A system for equitable workload distribution in clinical medical physics
title A system for equitable workload distribution in clinical medical physics
title_full A system for equitable workload distribution in clinical medical physics
title_fullStr A system for equitable workload distribution in clinical medical physics
title_full_unstemmed A system for equitable workload distribution in clinical medical physics
title_short A system for equitable workload distribution in clinical medical physics
title_sort system for equitable workload distribution in clinical medical physics
topic Management and Profession
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8664136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34697863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13460
work_keys_str_mv AT kimminsun asystemforequitableworkloaddistributioninclinicalmedicalphysics
AT forderic asystemforequitableworkloaddistributioninclinicalmedicalphysics
AT smithwade asystemforequitableworkloaddistributioninclinicalmedicalphysics
AT bowenstephenr asystemforequitableworkloaddistributioninclinicalmedicalphysics
AT genesersarah asystemforequitableworkloaddistributioninclinicalmedicalphysics
AT meyerjuergen asystemforequitableworkloaddistributioninclinicalmedicalphysics
AT kimminsun systemforequitableworkloaddistributioninclinicalmedicalphysics
AT forderic systemforequitableworkloaddistributioninclinicalmedicalphysics
AT smithwade systemforequitableworkloaddistributioninclinicalmedicalphysics
AT bowenstephenr systemforequitableworkloaddistributioninclinicalmedicalphysics
AT genesersarah systemforequitableworkloaddistributioninclinicalmedicalphysics
AT meyerjuergen systemforequitableworkloaddistributioninclinicalmedicalphysics