Cargando…
New dosimetric guidelines for linear Boltzmann transport equations through comparative evaluation of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung treatment planning
PURPOSE: To propose guidelines for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) when using Acuros XB (AXB) equivalent to the existing ones developed for convolution algorithms such as analytic anisotropic algorithm (AAA), considering the difference between the algorithms. METHODS: A retrospective...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8664148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34783438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13464 |
_version_ | 1784613785926893568 |
---|---|
author | Webster, Matthew Tanny, Sean Joyce, Neil Herman, Amy Chen, Yuhchyau Milano, Michael Usuki, Kenneth Constine, Louis Singh, Deepinder Yeo, Inhwan |
author_facet | Webster, Matthew Tanny, Sean Joyce, Neil Herman, Amy Chen, Yuhchyau Milano, Michael Usuki, Kenneth Constine, Louis Singh, Deepinder Yeo, Inhwan |
author_sort | Webster, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To propose guidelines for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) when using Acuros XB (AXB) equivalent to the existing ones developed for convolution algorithms such as analytic anisotropic algorithm (AAA), considering the difference between the algorithms. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 30 lung patients previously treated with SBRT. The original AAA plans, which were developed using dynamic conformal arcs, were recalculated and then renormalized for planning target volume (PTV) coverage using AXB. The recalculated and renormalized plans were compared to the original plans based on V100% and V90% PTV coverage, as well as V105%, conformality index, D(2cm), Rx/D(max), R50, and D(min). These metrics were analyzed nominally and on variations according to RTOG and NRG guidelines. Based on the relative difference between each metric in the AAA and AXB plans, new guidelines were developed. The relative differences in our cohort were compared to previously documented AAA to AXB comparisons found in the literature. RESULTS: AAA plans recalculated in AXB had a significant reduction in most dosimetric metrics. The most notable changes were in V100% (4%) and the conformality index (7.5%). To achieve equal PTV coverage, AXB required an average of 1.8% more monitor units (MU). This fits well with previously published data. Applying the new guidelines to the AXB plans significantly increased the number of minor violations with no change in major violations, making them comparable to those of the original AAA plans. CONCLUSION: The relative difference found between AAA and AXB for SBRT lung plans has been shown to be consistent with previous works. Based on these findings, new guidelines for lung SBRT are recommended when planning with AXB. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8664148 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86641482021-12-21 New dosimetric guidelines for linear Boltzmann transport equations through comparative evaluation of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung treatment planning Webster, Matthew Tanny, Sean Joyce, Neil Herman, Amy Chen, Yuhchyau Milano, Michael Usuki, Kenneth Constine, Louis Singh, Deepinder Yeo, Inhwan J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To propose guidelines for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) when using Acuros XB (AXB) equivalent to the existing ones developed for convolution algorithms such as analytic anisotropic algorithm (AAA), considering the difference between the algorithms. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 30 lung patients previously treated with SBRT. The original AAA plans, which were developed using dynamic conformal arcs, were recalculated and then renormalized for planning target volume (PTV) coverage using AXB. The recalculated and renormalized plans were compared to the original plans based on V100% and V90% PTV coverage, as well as V105%, conformality index, D(2cm), Rx/D(max), R50, and D(min). These metrics were analyzed nominally and on variations according to RTOG and NRG guidelines. Based on the relative difference between each metric in the AAA and AXB plans, new guidelines were developed. The relative differences in our cohort were compared to previously documented AAA to AXB comparisons found in the literature. RESULTS: AAA plans recalculated in AXB had a significant reduction in most dosimetric metrics. The most notable changes were in V100% (4%) and the conformality index (7.5%). To achieve equal PTV coverage, AXB required an average of 1.8% more monitor units (MU). This fits well with previously published data. Applying the new guidelines to the AXB plans significantly increased the number of minor violations with no change in major violations, making them comparable to those of the original AAA plans. CONCLUSION: The relative difference found between AAA and AXB for SBRT lung plans has been shown to be consistent with previous works. Based on these findings, new guidelines for lung SBRT are recommended when planning with AXB. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8664148/ /pubmed/34783438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13464 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Webster, Matthew Tanny, Sean Joyce, Neil Herman, Amy Chen, Yuhchyau Milano, Michael Usuki, Kenneth Constine, Louis Singh, Deepinder Yeo, Inhwan New dosimetric guidelines for linear Boltzmann transport equations through comparative evaluation of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung treatment planning |
title | New dosimetric guidelines for linear Boltzmann transport equations through comparative evaluation of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung treatment planning |
title_full | New dosimetric guidelines for linear Boltzmann transport equations through comparative evaluation of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung treatment planning |
title_fullStr | New dosimetric guidelines for linear Boltzmann transport equations through comparative evaluation of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung treatment planning |
title_full_unstemmed | New dosimetric guidelines for linear Boltzmann transport equations through comparative evaluation of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung treatment planning |
title_short | New dosimetric guidelines for linear Boltzmann transport equations through comparative evaluation of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung treatment planning |
title_sort | new dosimetric guidelines for linear boltzmann transport equations through comparative evaluation of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung treatment planning |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8664148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34783438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13464 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT webstermatthew newdosimetricguidelinesforlinearboltzmanntransportequationsthroughcomparativeevaluationofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlungtreatmentplanning AT tannysean newdosimetricguidelinesforlinearboltzmanntransportequationsthroughcomparativeevaluationofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlungtreatmentplanning AT joyceneil newdosimetricguidelinesforlinearboltzmanntransportequationsthroughcomparativeevaluationofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlungtreatmentplanning AT hermanamy newdosimetricguidelinesforlinearboltzmanntransportequationsthroughcomparativeevaluationofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlungtreatmentplanning AT chenyuhchyau newdosimetricguidelinesforlinearboltzmanntransportequationsthroughcomparativeevaluationofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlungtreatmentplanning AT milanomichael newdosimetricguidelinesforlinearboltzmanntransportequationsthroughcomparativeevaluationofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlungtreatmentplanning AT usukikenneth newdosimetricguidelinesforlinearboltzmanntransportequationsthroughcomparativeevaluationofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlungtreatmentplanning AT constinelouis newdosimetricguidelinesforlinearboltzmanntransportequationsthroughcomparativeevaluationofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlungtreatmentplanning AT singhdeepinder newdosimetricguidelinesforlinearboltzmanntransportequationsthroughcomparativeevaluationofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlungtreatmentplanning AT yeoinhwan newdosimetricguidelinesforlinearboltzmanntransportequationsthroughcomparativeevaluationofstereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforlungtreatmentplanning |