Cargando…

Immediate analgesic effect of two modes of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare and assess the immediate analgesic effects of conventional and burst transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with chronic low back pain. METHODS: We conducted a three-arm single-blinded randomized controlled trial. A total of 105 patients with non-specific chron...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pivovarsky, Madeline Luiza Ferreira, Gaideski, Fernanda, de Macedo, Rafael Michel, Korelo, Raciele Ivandra Guarda, Guarita-Souza, Luiz César, Liebano, Richard Eloin, de Macedo, Ana Carolina Brandt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8664285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932756
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO6027
_version_ 1784613815539728384
author Pivovarsky, Madeline Luiza Ferreira
Gaideski, Fernanda
de Macedo, Rafael Michel
Korelo, Raciele Ivandra Guarda
Guarita-Souza, Luiz César
Liebano, Richard Eloin
de Macedo, Ana Carolina Brandt
author_facet Pivovarsky, Madeline Luiza Ferreira
Gaideski, Fernanda
de Macedo, Rafael Michel
Korelo, Raciele Ivandra Guarda
Guarita-Souza, Luiz César
Liebano, Richard Eloin
de Macedo, Ana Carolina Brandt
author_sort Pivovarsky, Madeline Luiza Ferreira
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare and assess the immediate analgesic effects of conventional and burst transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with chronic low back pain. METHODS: We conducted a three-arm single-blinded randomized controlled trial. A total of 105 patients with non-specific chronic low back pain aged between 18 and 85 years were randomly assigned into the following groups: Placebo Group (sham electrical stimulation), Conventional TENS Group (continuous stimulation at 100Hz for 100µs with sensory intensity), and Burst TENS Group (stimulation at 100Hz modulated at 2Hz for 100µs with motor-level intensity). All groups received a single application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for 30 minutes. The outcomes, namely, pain intensity, quality of pain, and pressure pain threshold were measured by the visual analog scale, McGill pain questionnaire, and algometry, respectively. The patients were evaluated before and immediately after the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation application. RESULTS: Pain intensity (visual analog scale score) and quality of pain (McGill pain questionnaire score) significantly decreased (p<0.05) in Intervention Groups (Conventional TENS Group and Burst TENS Group). A positive effect was observed in the interventions compared to the Placebo Group in all domains of the McGill pain questionnaire (p<0.05), excepting for the pain intensity. Pressure pain threshold significantly increased (p<0.05) immediately after the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation application in both Intervention Groups, but not in the Placebo Group. For significant difference was found during assessment when comparing both Intervetion Group. CONCLUSION: Both transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation modes were effective for pain modulation. Moreover, there was an increase in the pressure pain threshold. No significant results were found to indicate the best mode for the treatment of chronic low back pain. Clinical Trial Registration: RBR-59YGRB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8664285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86642852021-12-12 Immediate analgesic effect of two modes of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial Pivovarsky, Madeline Luiza Ferreira Gaideski, Fernanda de Macedo, Rafael Michel Korelo, Raciele Ivandra Guarda Guarita-Souza, Luiz César Liebano, Richard Eloin de Macedo, Ana Carolina Brandt Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare and assess the immediate analgesic effects of conventional and burst transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with chronic low back pain. METHODS: We conducted a three-arm single-blinded randomized controlled trial. A total of 105 patients with non-specific chronic low back pain aged between 18 and 85 years were randomly assigned into the following groups: Placebo Group (sham electrical stimulation), Conventional TENS Group (continuous stimulation at 100Hz for 100µs with sensory intensity), and Burst TENS Group (stimulation at 100Hz modulated at 2Hz for 100µs with motor-level intensity). All groups received a single application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for 30 minutes. The outcomes, namely, pain intensity, quality of pain, and pressure pain threshold were measured by the visual analog scale, McGill pain questionnaire, and algometry, respectively. The patients were evaluated before and immediately after the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation application. RESULTS: Pain intensity (visual analog scale score) and quality of pain (McGill pain questionnaire score) significantly decreased (p<0.05) in Intervention Groups (Conventional TENS Group and Burst TENS Group). A positive effect was observed in the interventions compared to the Placebo Group in all domains of the McGill pain questionnaire (p<0.05), excepting for the pain intensity. Pressure pain threshold significantly increased (p<0.05) immediately after the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation application in both Intervention Groups, but not in the Placebo Group. For significant difference was found during assessment when comparing both Intervetion Group. CONCLUSION: Both transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation modes were effective for pain modulation. Moreover, there was an increase in the pressure pain threshold. No significant results were found to indicate the best mode for the treatment of chronic low back pain. Clinical Trial Registration: RBR-59YGRB. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2021-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8664285/ /pubmed/34932756 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO6027 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pivovarsky, Madeline Luiza Ferreira
Gaideski, Fernanda
de Macedo, Rafael Michel
Korelo, Raciele Ivandra Guarda
Guarita-Souza, Luiz César
Liebano, Richard Eloin
de Macedo, Ana Carolina Brandt
Immediate analgesic effect of two modes of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title Immediate analgesic effect of two modes of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Immediate analgesic effect of two modes of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Immediate analgesic effect of two modes of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Immediate analgesic effect of two modes of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Immediate analgesic effect of two modes of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort immediate analgesic effect of two modes of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8664285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932756
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO6027
work_keys_str_mv AT pivovarskymadelineluizaferreira immediateanalgesiceffectoftwomodesoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationonpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gaideskifernanda immediateanalgesiceffectoftwomodesoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationonpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT demacedorafaelmichel immediateanalgesiceffectoftwomodesoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationonpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT koreloracieleivandraguarda immediateanalgesiceffectoftwomodesoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationonpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guaritasouzaluizcesar immediateanalgesiceffectoftwomodesoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationonpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liebanorichardeloin immediateanalgesiceffectoftwomodesoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationonpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT demacedoanacarolinabrandt immediateanalgesiceffectoftwomodesoftranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationonpatientswithchroniclowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial