Cargando…

A Radiological Evaluation of Lumbar Spinous Processes and Interspinous Spaces, Including Clinical Implications

Background and objective The aim of this study was the examination of morphometry of the spinous process (SP) and interspinous space (ISS) of the lumbar region to help provide a basis for the design and implantation of interspinous devices. Methods Between 2017 and 2019, 215 individuals underwent ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaya Ayvaz, Dicle, Kervancıoğlu, Piraye, Bahşi, Ayşe, Bahşi, İlhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8664751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34912602
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19454
_version_ 1784613910607822848
author Kaya Ayvaz, Dicle
Kervancıoğlu, Piraye
Bahşi, Ayşe
Bahşi, İlhan
author_facet Kaya Ayvaz, Dicle
Kervancıoğlu, Piraye
Bahşi, Ayşe
Bahşi, İlhan
author_sort Kaya Ayvaz, Dicle
collection PubMed
description Background and objective The aim of this study was the examination of morphometry of the spinous process (SP) and interspinous space (ISS) of the lumbar region to help provide a basis for the design and implantation of interspinous devices. Methods Between 2017 and 2019, 215 individuals underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar region for various reasons. No pathology was detected in these images, and the participants' age, height, and weight information when available were included in the study. From these images, the height and length of the SP and ISS in the lumbar region were noted. The heights of the SP and ISS were measured at three levels as anterior, middle, and posterior (respectively, anterior height of the spinous process [AHSP], middle height of the spinous process [MHSP], as well as posterior height of the spinous process [PHSP] for the height of SP, and anterior ISS, middle ISS and posterior ISS for the height of ISS). All measurements were compared according to the gender, age, weight, height, and body mass index of the individuals. Results The level with the lowest SP height and length was L5 vertebra. The ISS height and length were lowest at L4-L5. In addition, we observed a statistically significant difference at multiple levels with age, weight, height, and body mass index of the reference ranges. Conclusion We think that these changes should be considered when designing and implanting interspinous devices. Since there are few studies examining all these correlations, we think that the results of this study will make a unique contribution to the literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8664751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86647512021-12-14 A Radiological Evaluation of Lumbar Spinous Processes and Interspinous Spaces, Including Clinical Implications Kaya Ayvaz, Dicle Kervancıoğlu, Piraye Bahşi, Ayşe Bahşi, İlhan Cureus Neurosurgery Background and objective The aim of this study was the examination of morphometry of the spinous process (SP) and interspinous space (ISS) of the lumbar region to help provide a basis for the design and implantation of interspinous devices. Methods Between 2017 and 2019, 215 individuals underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar region for various reasons. No pathology was detected in these images, and the participants' age, height, and weight information when available were included in the study. From these images, the height and length of the SP and ISS in the lumbar region were noted. The heights of the SP and ISS were measured at three levels as anterior, middle, and posterior (respectively, anterior height of the spinous process [AHSP], middle height of the spinous process [MHSP], as well as posterior height of the spinous process [PHSP] for the height of SP, and anterior ISS, middle ISS and posterior ISS for the height of ISS). All measurements were compared according to the gender, age, weight, height, and body mass index of the individuals. Results The level with the lowest SP height and length was L5 vertebra. The ISS height and length were lowest at L4-L5. In addition, we observed a statistically significant difference at multiple levels with age, weight, height, and body mass index of the reference ranges. Conclusion We think that these changes should be considered when designing and implanting interspinous devices. Since there are few studies examining all these correlations, we think that the results of this study will make a unique contribution to the literature. Cureus 2021-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8664751/ /pubmed/34912602 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19454 Text en Copyright © 2021, Kaya Ayvaz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neurosurgery
Kaya Ayvaz, Dicle
Kervancıoğlu, Piraye
Bahşi, Ayşe
Bahşi, İlhan
A Radiological Evaluation of Lumbar Spinous Processes and Interspinous Spaces, Including Clinical Implications
title A Radiological Evaluation of Lumbar Spinous Processes and Interspinous Spaces, Including Clinical Implications
title_full A Radiological Evaluation of Lumbar Spinous Processes and Interspinous Spaces, Including Clinical Implications
title_fullStr A Radiological Evaluation of Lumbar Spinous Processes and Interspinous Spaces, Including Clinical Implications
title_full_unstemmed A Radiological Evaluation of Lumbar Spinous Processes and Interspinous Spaces, Including Clinical Implications
title_short A Radiological Evaluation of Lumbar Spinous Processes and Interspinous Spaces, Including Clinical Implications
title_sort radiological evaluation of lumbar spinous processes and interspinous spaces, including clinical implications
topic Neurosurgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8664751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34912602
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19454
work_keys_str_mv AT kayaayvazdicle aradiologicalevaluationoflumbarspinousprocessesandinterspinousspacesincludingclinicalimplications
AT kervancıoglupiraye aradiologicalevaluationoflumbarspinousprocessesandinterspinousspacesincludingclinicalimplications
AT bahsiayse aradiologicalevaluationoflumbarspinousprocessesandinterspinousspacesincludingclinicalimplications
AT bahsiilhan aradiologicalevaluationoflumbarspinousprocessesandinterspinousspacesincludingclinicalimplications
AT kayaayvazdicle radiologicalevaluationoflumbarspinousprocessesandinterspinousspacesincludingclinicalimplications
AT kervancıoglupiraye radiologicalevaluationoflumbarspinousprocessesandinterspinousspacesincludingclinicalimplications
AT bahsiayse radiologicalevaluationoflumbarspinousprocessesandinterspinousspacesincludingclinicalimplications
AT bahsiilhan radiologicalevaluationoflumbarspinousprocessesandinterspinousspacesincludingclinicalimplications