Cargando…
Accuracy in positioning of dental X-ray images – A comparative study of a portable X-ray device and a wall-mounted device
INTRODUCTION: The benefits of portable dental X-ray devices remain controversially debated. This study aimed to compare the accuracy in positioning dental X-ray images using handheld (Nomad Pro 2) and wall-mounted (Heliodent Plus) X-ray devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiographical imaging was exer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.09.018 |
_version_ | 1784613956502945792 |
---|---|
author | Lommen, Julian Schorn, Lara Nitschke, Julia Sproll, Christoph Zeller, Uwe Kübler, Norbert R. Handschel, Jörg Holtmann, Henrik |
author_facet | Lommen, Julian Schorn, Lara Nitschke, Julia Sproll, Christoph Zeller, Uwe Kübler, Norbert R. Handschel, Jörg Holtmann, Henrik |
author_sort | Lommen, Julian |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The benefits of portable dental X-ray devices remain controversially debated. This study aimed to compare the accuracy in positioning dental X-ray images using handheld (Nomad Pro 2) and wall-mounted (Heliodent Plus) X-ray devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiographical imaging was exercised on a maxillofacial phantom using the handheld dental X-ray device Nomad Pro 2 (Kavo Kerr, Biberach, Germany) and the wall-mounted dental X-ray device Heliodent Plus (Sirona Dental Systems, Bensheim, Germany). Accuracy of device positioning (i.e., centeredness and perpendicularity) was measured as horizontal and vertical deviation (pixels and millimeters) from a centrally positioned crosshair. The reproducibility of the results was tested for 80 images per device and operator. IBM SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Centeredness of produced dental X-rays was significantly better for the wall-mounted device than for the handheld device in both deviation from the x-axis (p = 0.042) and y-axis (p = 0.020). The perpendicularity of the produced dental X-rays was significantly better for the handheld device than for the wall-mounted device for both horizontal (p < 0.001) and vertical (p < 0.001) plains. CONCLUSIONS: Handheld dental X-ray devices appear to provide a high degree of accuracy in image positioning, especially in regard to proper perpendicular image angulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8665167 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86651672021-12-21 Accuracy in positioning of dental X-ray images – A comparative study of a portable X-ray device and a wall-mounted device Lommen, Julian Schorn, Lara Nitschke, Julia Sproll, Christoph Zeller, Uwe Kübler, Norbert R. Handschel, Jörg Holtmann, Henrik Saudi Dent J Original Article INTRODUCTION: The benefits of portable dental X-ray devices remain controversially debated. This study aimed to compare the accuracy in positioning dental X-ray images using handheld (Nomad Pro 2) and wall-mounted (Heliodent Plus) X-ray devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiographical imaging was exercised on a maxillofacial phantom using the handheld dental X-ray device Nomad Pro 2 (Kavo Kerr, Biberach, Germany) and the wall-mounted dental X-ray device Heliodent Plus (Sirona Dental Systems, Bensheim, Germany). Accuracy of device positioning (i.e., centeredness and perpendicularity) was measured as horizontal and vertical deviation (pixels and millimeters) from a centrally positioned crosshair. The reproducibility of the results was tested for 80 images per device and operator. IBM SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Centeredness of produced dental X-rays was significantly better for the wall-mounted device than for the handheld device in both deviation from the x-axis (p = 0.042) and y-axis (p = 0.020). The perpendicularity of the produced dental X-rays was significantly better for the handheld device than for the wall-mounted device for both horizontal (p < 0.001) and vertical (p < 0.001) plains. CONCLUSIONS: Handheld dental X-ray devices appear to provide a high degree of accuracy in image positioning, especially in regard to proper perpendicular image angulation. Elsevier 2021-12 2021-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8665167/ /pubmed/34938029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.09.018 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lommen, Julian Schorn, Lara Nitschke, Julia Sproll, Christoph Zeller, Uwe Kübler, Norbert R. Handschel, Jörg Holtmann, Henrik Accuracy in positioning of dental X-ray images – A comparative study of a portable X-ray device and a wall-mounted device |
title | Accuracy in positioning of dental X-ray images – A comparative study of a portable X-ray device and a wall-mounted device |
title_full | Accuracy in positioning of dental X-ray images – A comparative study of a portable X-ray device and a wall-mounted device |
title_fullStr | Accuracy in positioning of dental X-ray images – A comparative study of a portable X-ray device and a wall-mounted device |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy in positioning of dental X-ray images – A comparative study of a portable X-ray device and a wall-mounted device |
title_short | Accuracy in positioning of dental X-ray images – A comparative study of a portable X-ray device and a wall-mounted device |
title_sort | accuracy in positioning of dental x-ray images – a comparative study of a portable x-ray device and a wall-mounted device |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.09.018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lommenjulian accuracyinpositioningofdentalxrayimagesacomparativestudyofaportablexraydeviceandawallmounteddevice AT schornlara accuracyinpositioningofdentalxrayimagesacomparativestudyofaportablexraydeviceandawallmounteddevice AT nitschkejulia accuracyinpositioningofdentalxrayimagesacomparativestudyofaportablexraydeviceandawallmounteddevice AT sprollchristoph accuracyinpositioningofdentalxrayimagesacomparativestudyofaportablexraydeviceandawallmounteddevice AT zelleruwe accuracyinpositioningofdentalxrayimagesacomparativestudyofaportablexraydeviceandawallmounteddevice AT kublernorbertr accuracyinpositioningofdentalxrayimagesacomparativestudyofaportablexraydeviceandawallmounteddevice AT handscheljorg accuracyinpositioningofdentalxrayimagesacomparativestudyofaportablexraydeviceandawallmounteddevice AT holtmannhenrik accuracyinpositioningofdentalxrayimagesacomparativestudyofaportablexraydeviceandawallmounteddevice |