Cargando…

Effect of different curing times and distances on the microhardness of nanofilled resin-based composite restoration polymerized with high-intensity LED light curing units

PURPOSE: This study examined the effect of different distances and curing times on the microhardness (VHN) of nanofilled resin-based composite (RBC) restorations polymerized with high-intensity LED LCUs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five RBC specimens (2 mm thickness and 5 mm diameter) were fabric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Barakah, Haifa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.05.007
_version_ 1784613958162841600
author Barakah, Haifa
author_facet Barakah, Haifa
author_sort Barakah, Haifa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study examined the effect of different distances and curing times on the microhardness (VHN) of nanofilled resin-based composite (RBC) restorations polymerized with high-intensity LED LCUs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five RBC specimens (2 mm thickness and 5 mm diameter) were fabricated from Tetric-N-Ceram (Ivoclar Vivadent). Each of the 25 specimens was polymerized by means of one of three types of high-intensity LED LCUs: (B) Blue-Phase-G2 (polywave LED, Ivoclar Vivadent), (E) Elipar S10 (TM) (single-peak, 3 M ESPE), and (P) Planmica Lumion (single-peak, Mectron) at three different distances (0 mm, 2 mm, and 4 mm) at 20 sec, 40 s, and 60 sec. A microhardness tester (NOVA, Innovatest, The Netherlands) was used to measure the VHN from the top and bottom surfaces. Data for VHN were analyzed using mixed ANOVA, followed by post hoc analyses with p-values < 0.05. RESULTS: A significant difference was found in VHN between all three LED LCUs, where (B) specimens had the highest means, followed by (E) and (P). Bottom surface VHN values were reduced significantly (p < 0.05) compared to top surface values in all LCU types. With increasing distances up to 2 mm and 4 mm, VHN values with (E) and (P) were significantly reduced on the top and bottom surfaces (p < 0.05). When the curing times were increased for 40 and 60 sec, the VHN values were significantly improved (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, increasing the distance with (B) did not significantly reduce the VHN. Moreover, increasing the curing times did not significantly improve the VHN of the bottom surfaces. CONCLUSION: High-intensity LCUs have variable effects on the surface (top/bottom) hardness of Tetric-N-Ceram nanofilled RBC restoration. With increasing distance, VHN was reduced; therefore, compensation with more curing time (2 mm/40 sec and 4 mm/60 sec) is highly recommended with Elipar S10 and Planmica Lumion LCUs to improve the material surface hardness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8665174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86651742021-12-21 Effect of different curing times and distances on the microhardness of nanofilled resin-based composite restoration polymerized with high-intensity LED light curing units Barakah, Haifa Saudi Dent J Original Article PURPOSE: This study examined the effect of different distances and curing times on the microhardness (VHN) of nanofilled resin-based composite (RBC) restorations polymerized with high-intensity LED LCUs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five RBC specimens (2 mm thickness and 5 mm diameter) were fabricated from Tetric-N-Ceram (Ivoclar Vivadent). Each of the 25 specimens was polymerized by means of one of three types of high-intensity LED LCUs: (B) Blue-Phase-G2 (polywave LED, Ivoclar Vivadent), (E) Elipar S10 (TM) (single-peak, 3 M ESPE), and (P) Planmica Lumion (single-peak, Mectron) at three different distances (0 mm, 2 mm, and 4 mm) at 20 sec, 40 s, and 60 sec. A microhardness tester (NOVA, Innovatest, The Netherlands) was used to measure the VHN from the top and bottom surfaces. Data for VHN were analyzed using mixed ANOVA, followed by post hoc analyses with p-values < 0.05. RESULTS: A significant difference was found in VHN between all three LED LCUs, where (B) specimens had the highest means, followed by (E) and (P). Bottom surface VHN values were reduced significantly (p < 0.05) compared to top surface values in all LCU types. With increasing distances up to 2 mm and 4 mm, VHN values with (E) and (P) were significantly reduced on the top and bottom surfaces (p < 0.05). When the curing times were increased for 40 and 60 sec, the VHN values were significantly improved (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, increasing the distance with (B) did not significantly reduce the VHN. Moreover, increasing the curing times did not significantly improve the VHN of the bottom surfaces. CONCLUSION: High-intensity LCUs have variable effects on the surface (top/bottom) hardness of Tetric-N-Ceram nanofilled RBC restoration. With increasing distance, VHN was reduced; therefore, compensation with more curing time (2 mm/40 sec and 4 mm/60 sec) is highly recommended with Elipar S10 and Planmica Lumion LCUs to improve the material surface hardness. Elsevier 2021-12 2021-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8665174/ /pubmed/34938047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.05.007 Text en © 2021 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Barakah, Haifa
Effect of different curing times and distances on the microhardness of nanofilled resin-based composite restoration polymerized with high-intensity LED light curing units
title Effect of different curing times and distances on the microhardness of nanofilled resin-based composite restoration polymerized with high-intensity LED light curing units
title_full Effect of different curing times and distances on the microhardness of nanofilled resin-based composite restoration polymerized with high-intensity LED light curing units
title_fullStr Effect of different curing times and distances on the microhardness of nanofilled resin-based composite restoration polymerized with high-intensity LED light curing units
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different curing times and distances on the microhardness of nanofilled resin-based composite restoration polymerized with high-intensity LED light curing units
title_short Effect of different curing times and distances on the microhardness of nanofilled resin-based composite restoration polymerized with high-intensity LED light curing units
title_sort effect of different curing times and distances on the microhardness of nanofilled resin-based composite restoration polymerized with high-intensity led light curing units
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.05.007
work_keys_str_mv AT barakahhaifa effectofdifferentcuringtimesanddistancesonthemicrohardnessofnanofilledresinbasedcompositerestorationpolymerizedwithhighintensityledlightcuringunits