Cargando…

Pulpal dressing condensation methods in pulpotomy for primary molars: An in-vitro comparative study

PURPOSE: To compare three condensation techniques of zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) as a pulpal dressing material during pulpotomy in extracted primary molars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty primary first and second molars were embedded in individual wax casts and divided into three groups consisting of 20 t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walia, Tarun, Alzayer, Wed Fahmi Ali, Nemer, Mohammed Nemer A. Al
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.06.002
_version_ 1784613962507091968
author Walia, Tarun
Alzayer, Wed Fahmi Ali
Nemer, Mohammed Nemer A. Al
author_facet Walia, Tarun
Alzayer, Wed Fahmi Ali
Nemer, Mohammed Nemer A. Al
author_sort Walia, Tarun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare three condensation techniques of zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) as a pulpal dressing material during pulpotomy in extracted primary molars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty primary first and second molars were embedded in individual wax casts and divided into three groups consisting of 20 teeth each. In group I, the ZOE base was condensed by an amalgam condenser, while a moist cotton pellet was used in group II. A combination of an amalgam condenser and a wet cotton pellet tested the condensation mentod in group III. The condensation quality of the three techniques was evaluated through two digital periapical radiographs taken in a lateral and anterior-posterior direction. RESULTS: Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test showed that there was no significant difference between the technique and quality of ZOE compaction. However, a significant difference was observed on condensation assessment for combined three groups on lateral radiographs vs the appearance on antero-posterior radiographs with the p-value set at < 0.05. CONCLUSION: Voids appeared with all three techniques. A combination of an amalgam condenser and the wet cotton wool pellet was the least effective method of condensation. Lateral radiographs revealed much fewer spaces between the ZOE and pulpal floor in comparison to antero-posterior images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8665192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86651922021-12-21 Pulpal dressing condensation methods in pulpotomy for primary molars: An in-vitro comparative study Walia, Tarun Alzayer, Wed Fahmi Ali Nemer, Mohammed Nemer A. Al Saudi Dent J Original Article PURPOSE: To compare three condensation techniques of zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) as a pulpal dressing material during pulpotomy in extracted primary molars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty primary first and second molars were embedded in individual wax casts and divided into three groups consisting of 20 teeth each. In group I, the ZOE base was condensed by an amalgam condenser, while a moist cotton pellet was used in group II. A combination of an amalgam condenser and a wet cotton pellet tested the condensation mentod in group III. The condensation quality of the three techniques was evaluated through two digital periapical radiographs taken in a lateral and anterior-posterior direction. RESULTS: Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test showed that there was no significant difference between the technique and quality of ZOE compaction. However, a significant difference was observed on condensation assessment for combined three groups on lateral radiographs vs the appearance on antero-posterior radiographs with the p-value set at < 0.05. CONCLUSION: Voids appeared with all three techniques. A combination of an amalgam condenser and the wet cotton wool pellet was the least effective method of condensation. Lateral radiographs revealed much fewer spaces between the ZOE and pulpal floor in comparison to antero-posterior images. Elsevier 2021-12 2021-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8665192/ /pubmed/34938046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.06.002 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Walia, Tarun
Alzayer, Wed Fahmi Ali
Nemer, Mohammed Nemer A. Al
Pulpal dressing condensation methods in pulpotomy for primary molars: An in-vitro comparative study
title Pulpal dressing condensation methods in pulpotomy for primary molars: An in-vitro comparative study
title_full Pulpal dressing condensation methods in pulpotomy for primary molars: An in-vitro comparative study
title_fullStr Pulpal dressing condensation methods in pulpotomy for primary molars: An in-vitro comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Pulpal dressing condensation methods in pulpotomy for primary molars: An in-vitro comparative study
title_short Pulpal dressing condensation methods in pulpotomy for primary molars: An in-vitro comparative study
title_sort pulpal dressing condensation methods in pulpotomy for primary molars: an in-vitro comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.06.002
work_keys_str_mv AT waliatarun pulpaldressingcondensationmethodsinpulpotomyforprimarymolarsaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT alzayerwedfahmiali pulpaldressingcondensationmethodsinpulpotomyforprimarymolarsaninvitrocomparativestudy
AT nemermohammednemeraal pulpaldressingcondensationmethodsinpulpotomyforprimarymolarsaninvitrocomparativestudy