Cargando…
Mechanisms of Change in Digital Health Interventions for Mental Disorders in Youth: Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Digital health interventions (DHIs) are efficacious for several mental disorders in youth; however, integrated, evidence-based knowledge about the mechanisms of change in these interventions is lacking. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate studies on mediato...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34842543 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/29742 |
_version_ | 1784614000440377344 |
---|---|
author | Domhardt, Matthias Engler, Sophie Nowak, Hannah Lutsch, Arne Baumel, Amit Baumeister, Harald |
author_facet | Domhardt, Matthias Engler, Sophie Nowak, Hannah Lutsch, Arne Baumel, Amit Baumeister, Harald |
author_sort | Domhardt, Matthias |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Digital health interventions (DHIs) are efficacious for several mental disorders in youth; however, integrated, evidence-based knowledge about the mechanisms of change in these interventions is lacking. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate studies on mediators and mechanisms of change in different DHIs for common mental disorders in children and adolescents. METHODS: A systematic literature search of the electronic databases Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO was conducted, complemented by backward and forward searches. Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion, extracted the data, and rated the methodological quality of eligible studies (ie, risk of bias and 8 quality criteria for process research). RESULTS: A total of 25 studies that have evaluated 39 potential mediators were included in this review. Cognitive mediators were the largest group of examined intervening variables, followed by a broad range of emotional and affective, interpersonal, parenting behavior, and other mediators. The mediator categories with the highest percentages of significant intervening variables were the groups of affective mediators (4/4, 100%) and combined cognitive mediators (13/19, 68%). Although more than three-quarters of the eligible studies met 5 or more quality criteria, causal conclusions have been widely precluded. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review might guide the empirically informed advancement of DHIs, contributing to improved intervention outcomes, and the discussion of methodological recommendations for process research might facilitate mediation studies with more pertinent designs, allowing for conclusions with higher causal certainty in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8665396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86653962021-12-30 Mechanisms of Change in Digital Health Interventions for Mental Disorders in Youth: Systematic Review Domhardt, Matthias Engler, Sophie Nowak, Hannah Lutsch, Arne Baumel, Amit Baumeister, Harald J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Digital health interventions (DHIs) are efficacious for several mental disorders in youth; however, integrated, evidence-based knowledge about the mechanisms of change in these interventions is lacking. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate studies on mediators and mechanisms of change in different DHIs for common mental disorders in children and adolescents. METHODS: A systematic literature search of the electronic databases Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO was conducted, complemented by backward and forward searches. Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion, extracted the data, and rated the methodological quality of eligible studies (ie, risk of bias and 8 quality criteria for process research). RESULTS: A total of 25 studies that have evaluated 39 potential mediators were included in this review. Cognitive mediators were the largest group of examined intervening variables, followed by a broad range of emotional and affective, interpersonal, parenting behavior, and other mediators. The mediator categories with the highest percentages of significant intervening variables were the groups of affective mediators (4/4, 100%) and combined cognitive mediators (13/19, 68%). Although more than three-quarters of the eligible studies met 5 or more quality criteria, causal conclusions have been widely precluded. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review might guide the empirically informed advancement of DHIs, contributing to improved intervention outcomes, and the discussion of methodological recommendations for process research might facilitate mediation studies with more pertinent designs, allowing for conclusions with higher causal certainty in the future. JMIR Publications 2021-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8665396/ /pubmed/34842543 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/29742 Text en ©Matthias Domhardt, Sophie Engler, Hannah Nowak, Arne Lutsch, Amit Baumel, Harald Baumeister. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 26.11.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Domhardt, Matthias Engler, Sophie Nowak, Hannah Lutsch, Arne Baumel, Amit Baumeister, Harald Mechanisms of Change in Digital Health Interventions for Mental Disorders in Youth: Systematic Review |
title | Mechanisms of Change in Digital Health Interventions for Mental Disorders in Youth: Systematic Review |
title_full | Mechanisms of Change in Digital Health Interventions for Mental Disorders in Youth: Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Mechanisms of Change in Digital Health Interventions for Mental Disorders in Youth: Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanisms of Change in Digital Health Interventions for Mental Disorders in Youth: Systematic Review |
title_short | Mechanisms of Change in Digital Health Interventions for Mental Disorders in Youth: Systematic Review |
title_sort | mechanisms of change in digital health interventions for mental disorders in youth: systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34842543 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/29742 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT domhardtmatthias mechanismsofchangeindigitalhealthinterventionsformentaldisordersinyouthsystematicreview AT englersophie mechanismsofchangeindigitalhealthinterventionsformentaldisordersinyouthsystematicreview AT nowakhannah mechanismsofchangeindigitalhealthinterventionsformentaldisordersinyouthsystematicreview AT lutscharne mechanismsofchangeindigitalhealthinterventionsformentaldisordersinyouthsystematicreview AT baumelamit mechanismsofchangeindigitalhealthinterventionsformentaldisordersinyouthsystematicreview AT baumeisterharald mechanismsofchangeindigitalhealthinterventionsformentaldisordersinyouthsystematicreview |