Cargando…

Mechanisms of Change in Digital Health Interventions for Mental Disorders in Youth: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Digital health interventions (DHIs) are efficacious for several mental disorders in youth; however, integrated, evidence-based knowledge about the mechanisms of change in these interventions is lacking. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate studies on mediato...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Domhardt, Matthias, Engler, Sophie, Nowak, Hannah, Lutsch, Arne, Baumel, Amit, Baumeister, Harald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34842543
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/29742
_version_ 1784614000440377344
author Domhardt, Matthias
Engler, Sophie
Nowak, Hannah
Lutsch, Arne
Baumel, Amit
Baumeister, Harald
author_facet Domhardt, Matthias
Engler, Sophie
Nowak, Hannah
Lutsch, Arne
Baumel, Amit
Baumeister, Harald
author_sort Domhardt, Matthias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Digital health interventions (DHIs) are efficacious for several mental disorders in youth; however, integrated, evidence-based knowledge about the mechanisms of change in these interventions is lacking. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate studies on mediators and mechanisms of change in different DHIs for common mental disorders in children and adolescents. METHODS: A systematic literature search of the electronic databases Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO was conducted, complemented by backward and forward searches. Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion, extracted the data, and rated the methodological quality of eligible studies (ie, risk of bias and 8 quality criteria for process research). RESULTS: A total of 25 studies that have evaluated 39 potential mediators were included in this review. Cognitive mediators were the largest group of examined intervening variables, followed by a broad range of emotional and affective, interpersonal, parenting behavior, and other mediators. The mediator categories with the highest percentages of significant intervening variables were the groups of affective mediators (4/4, 100%) and combined cognitive mediators (13/19, 68%). Although more than three-quarters of the eligible studies met 5 or more quality criteria, causal conclusions have been widely precluded. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review might guide the empirically informed advancement of DHIs, contributing to improved intervention outcomes, and the discussion of methodological recommendations for process research might facilitate mediation studies with more pertinent designs, allowing for conclusions with higher causal certainty in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8665396
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86653962021-12-30 Mechanisms of Change in Digital Health Interventions for Mental Disorders in Youth: Systematic Review Domhardt, Matthias Engler, Sophie Nowak, Hannah Lutsch, Arne Baumel, Amit Baumeister, Harald J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Digital health interventions (DHIs) are efficacious for several mental disorders in youth; however, integrated, evidence-based knowledge about the mechanisms of change in these interventions is lacking. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate studies on mediators and mechanisms of change in different DHIs for common mental disorders in children and adolescents. METHODS: A systematic literature search of the electronic databases Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO was conducted, complemented by backward and forward searches. Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion, extracted the data, and rated the methodological quality of eligible studies (ie, risk of bias and 8 quality criteria for process research). RESULTS: A total of 25 studies that have evaluated 39 potential mediators were included in this review. Cognitive mediators were the largest group of examined intervening variables, followed by a broad range of emotional and affective, interpersonal, parenting behavior, and other mediators. The mediator categories with the highest percentages of significant intervening variables were the groups of affective mediators (4/4, 100%) and combined cognitive mediators (13/19, 68%). Although more than three-quarters of the eligible studies met 5 or more quality criteria, causal conclusions have been widely precluded. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review might guide the empirically informed advancement of DHIs, contributing to improved intervention outcomes, and the discussion of methodological recommendations for process research might facilitate mediation studies with more pertinent designs, allowing for conclusions with higher causal certainty in the future. JMIR Publications 2021-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8665396/ /pubmed/34842543 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/29742 Text en ©Matthias Domhardt, Sophie Engler, Hannah Nowak, Arne Lutsch, Amit Baumel, Harald Baumeister. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 26.11.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Domhardt, Matthias
Engler, Sophie
Nowak, Hannah
Lutsch, Arne
Baumel, Amit
Baumeister, Harald
Mechanisms of Change in Digital Health Interventions for Mental Disorders in Youth: Systematic Review
title Mechanisms of Change in Digital Health Interventions for Mental Disorders in Youth: Systematic Review
title_full Mechanisms of Change in Digital Health Interventions for Mental Disorders in Youth: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Mechanisms of Change in Digital Health Interventions for Mental Disorders in Youth: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Mechanisms of Change in Digital Health Interventions for Mental Disorders in Youth: Systematic Review
title_short Mechanisms of Change in Digital Health Interventions for Mental Disorders in Youth: Systematic Review
title_sort mechanisms of change in digital health interventions for mental disorders in youth: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665396/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34842543
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/29742
work_keys_str_mv AT domhardtmatthias mechanismsofchangeindigitalhealthinterventionsformentaldisordersinyouthsystematicreview
AT englersophie mechanismsofchangeindigitalhealthinterventionsformentaldisordersinyouthsystematicreview
AT nowakhannah mechanismsofchangeindigitalhealthinterventionsformentaldisordersinyouthsystematicreview
AT lutscharne mechanismsofchangeindigitalhealthinterventionsformentaldisordersinyouthsystematicreview
AT baumelamit mechanismsofchangeindigitalhealthinterventionsformentaldisordersinyouthsystematicreview
AT baumeisterharald mechanismsofchangeindigitalhealthinterventionsformentaldisordersinyouthsystematicreview