Cargando…
Active Annotation in Evaluating the Credibility of Web-Based Medical Information: Guidelines for Creating Training Data Sets for Machine Learning
BACKGROUND: The spread of false medical information on the web is rapidly accelerating. Establishing the credibility of web-based medical information has become a pressing necessity. Machine learning offers a solution that, when properly deployed, can be an effective tool in fighting medical misinfo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34842547 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26065 |
_version_ | 1784614000678404096 |
---|---|
author | Nabożny, Aleksandra Balcerzak, Bartłomiej Wierzbicki, Adam Morzy, Mikołaj Chlabicz, Małgorzata |
author_facet | Nabożny, Aleksandra Balcerzak, Bartłomiej Wierzbicki, Adam Morzy, Mikołaj Chlabicz, Małgorzata |
author_sort | Nabożny, Aleksandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The spread of false medical information on the web is rapidly accelerating. Establishing the credibility of web-based medical information has become a pressing necessity. Machine learning offers a solution that, when properly deployed, can be an effective tool in fighting medical misinformation on the web. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to present a comprehensive framework for designing and curating machine learning training data sets for web-based medical information credibility assessment. We show how to construct the annotation process. Our main objective is to support researchers from the medical and computer science communities. We offer guidelines on the preparation of data sets for machine learning models that can fight medical misinformation. METHODS: We begin by providing the annotation protocol for medical experts involved in medical sentence credibility evaluation. The protocol is based on a qualitative study of our experimental data. To address the problem of insufficient initial labels, we propose a preprocessing pipeline for the batch of sentences to be assessed. It consists of representation learning, clustering, and reranking. We call this process active annotation. RESULTS: We collected more than 10,000 annotations of statements related to selected medical subjects (psychiatry, cholesterol, autism, antibiotics, vaccines, steroids, birth methods, and food allergy testing) for less than US $7000 by employing 9 highly qualified annotators (certified medical professionals), and we release this data set to the general public. We developed an active annotation framework for more efficient annotation of noncredible medical statements. The application of qualitative analysis resulted in a better annotation protocol for our future efforts in data set creation. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the qualitative analysis support our claims of the efficacy of the presented method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8665397 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86653972021-12-30 Active Annotation in Evaluating the Credibility of Web-Based Medical Information: Guidelines for Creating Training Data Sets for Machine Learning Nabożny, Aleksandra Balcerzak, Bartłomiej Wierzbicki, Adam Morzy, Mikołaj Chlabicz, Małgorzata JMIR Med Inform Original Paper BACKGROUND: The spread of false medical information on the web is rapidly accelerating. Establishing the credibility of web-based medical information has become a pressing necessity. Machine learning offers a solution that, when properly deployed, can be an effective tool in fighting medical misinformation on the web. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to present a comprehensive framework for designing and curating machine learning training data sets for web-based medical information credibility assessment. We show how to construct the annotation process. Our main objective is to support researchers from the medical and computer science communities. We offer guidelines on the preparation of data sets for machine learning models that can fight medical misinformation. METHODS: We begin by providing the annotation protocol for medical experts involved in medical sentence credibility evaluation. The protocol is based on a qualitative study of our experimental data. To address the problem of insufficient initial labels, we propose a preprocessing pipeline for the batch of sentences to be assessed. It consists of representation learning, clustering, and reranking. We call this process active annotation. RESULTS: We collected more than 10,000 annotations of statements related to selected medical subjects (psychiatry, cholesterol, autism, antibiotics, vaccines, steroids, birth methods, and food allergy testing) for less than US $7000 by employing 9 highly qualified annotators (certified medical professionals), and we release this data set to the general public. We developed an active annotation framework for more efficient annotation of noncredible medical statements. The application of qualitative analysis resulted in a better annotation protocol for our future efforts in data set creation. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the qualitative analysis support our claims of the efficacy of the presented method. JMIR Publications 2021-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8665397/ /pubmed/34842547 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26065 Text en ©Aleksandra Nabożny, Bartłomiej Balcerzak, Adam Wierzbicki, Mikołaj Morzy, Małgorzata Chlabicz. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (https://medinform.jmir.org), 26.11.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://medinform.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Nabożny, Aleksandra Balcerzak, Bartłomiej Wierzbicki, Adam Morzy, Mikołaj Chlabicz, Małgorzata Active Annotation in Evaluating the Credibility of Web-Based Medical Information: Guidelines for Creating Training Data Sets for Machine Learning |
title | Active Annotation in Evaluating the Credibility of Web-Based Medical Information: Guidelines for Creating Training Data Sets for Machine Learning |
title_full | Active Annotation in Evaluating the Credibility of Web-Based Medical Information: Guidelines for Creating Training Data Sets for Machine Learning |
title_fullStr | Active Annotation in Evaluating the Credibility of Web-Based Medical Information: Guidelines for Creating Training Data Sets for Machine Learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Active Annotation in Evaluating the Credibility of Web-Based Medical Information: Guidelines for Creating Training Data Sets for Machine Learning |
title_short | Active Annotation in Evaluating the Credibility of Web-Based Medical Information: Guidelines for Creating Training Data Sets for Machine Learning |
title_sort | active annotation in evaluating the credibility of web-based medical information: guidelines for creating training data sets for machine learning |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34842547 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/26065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naboznyaleksandra activeannotationinevaluatingthecredibilityofwebbasedmedicalinformationguidelinesforcreatingtrainingdatasetsformachinelearning AT balcerzakbartłomiej activeannotationinevaluatingthecredibilityofwebbasedmedicalinformationguidelinesforcreatingtrainingdatasetsformachinelearning AT wierzbickiadam activeannotationinevaluatingthecredibilityofwebbasedmedicalinformationguidelinesforcreatingtrainingdatasetsformachinelearning AT morzymikołaj activeannotationinevaluatingthecredibilityofwebbasedmedicalinformationguidelinesforcreatingtrainingdatasetsformachinelearning AT chlabiczmałgorzata activeannotationinevaluatingthecredibilityofwebbasedmedicalinformationguidelinesforcreatingtrainingdatasetsformachinelearning |