Cargando…

Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation in the Removal of the Smear Layer Using two Different Chelating Agents

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: The smear layer may harbor microorganisms and necrotic pulp tissue, jeopardizing irrigant penetration. Recently, Dual Rinse(®), a weak chelating agent, has been introduced to the market. However, its chelating capacity in the final irrigation protocol with different activat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Espinoza, Ismael, Conde Villar, Antonio Jesus, Loroño, Gaizka, Estevez, Roberto, Plotino, Gianluca, Cisneros, Rafael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34904120
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.86680.1204
_version_ 1784614009138315264
author Espinoza, Ismael
Conde Villar, Antonio Jesus
Loroño, Gaizka
Estevez, Roberto
Plotino, Gianluca
Cisneros, Rafael
author_facet Espinoza, Ismael
Conde Villar, Antonio Jesus
Loroño, Gaizka
Estevez, Roberto
Plotino, Gianluca
Cisneros, Rafael
author_sort Espinoza, Ismael
collection PubMed
description STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: The smear layer may harbor microorganisms and necrotic pulp tissue, jeopardizing irrigant penetration. Recently, Dual Rinse(®), a weak chelating agent, has been introduced to the market. However, its chelating capacity in the final irrigation protocol with different activation systems has not yet been deeply analyzed. PURPOSE: The aim of this ex vivo study was to evaluate the effectiveness of passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and XP-endo Finisher (XP) on smear layer removal in combination with two chelating agents, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and etidronic acid (HEDP). MATERIALS AND METHOD: This in vitro, experimental study evaluated fifty-two single-rooted human teeth were standardized to 16 mm in length. Root canal instrumentation was performed by the ProTaper Gold system up to the F4 file. The apical end of the samples was sealed with wax to simulate a closed system. Teeth from group 1 (n=24) were irrigated with 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% EDTA, while teeth from group 2 (n=24) were irrigated with 3% NaOCl mixed 9% HEDP. Both groups were divided into two subgroups (n=12) depending on the activation system used: XP (group XP-EDTA and XP-HEDP) or PUI (group PUI-EDTA and PUI-HEDP). The specimens were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy at 3, 5 and 8mm from the apex. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Bonferroni tests considering p> 0.05 as significant. RESULTS: PUI-EDTA was the most effective at removing the smear layer, with a statistically significant difference from XP-EDTA (p< 0.042) and group XP-HEDP (p< 0.003). There were no statistically significant differences among the other groups. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this ex vivo study, no activation system was able to completely remove the smear layer from the root canal walls. However, the combination of NaOCl with ultrasonically activated EDTA obtained better results than the other treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8665438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86654382021-12-12 Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation in the Removal of the Smear Layer Using two Different Chelating Agents Espinoza, Ismael Conde Villar, Antonio Jesus Loroño, Gaizka Estevez, Roberto Plotino, Gianluca Cisneros, Rafael J Dent (Shiraz) Original Article STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: The smear layer may harbor microorganisms and necrotic pulp tissue, jeopardizing irrigant penetration. Recently, Dual Rinse(®), a weak chelating agent, has been introduced to the market. However, its chelating capacity in the final irrigation protocol with different activation systems has not yet been deeply analyzed. PURPOSE: The aim of this ex vivo study was to evaluate the effectiveness of passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and XP-endo Finisher (XP) on smear layer removal in combination with two chelating agents, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and etidronic acid (HEDP). MATERIALS AND METHOD: This in vitro, experimental study evaluated fifty-two single-rooted human teeth were standardized to 16 mm in length. Root canal instrumentation was performed by the ProTaper Gold system up to the F4 file. The apical end of the samples was sealed with wax to simulate a closed system. Teeth from group 1 (n=24) were irrigated with 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% EDTA, while teeth from group 2 (n=24) were irrigated with 3% NaOCl mixed 9% HEDP. Both groups were divided into two subgroups (n=12) depending on the activation system used: XP (group XP-EDTA and XP-HEDP) or PUI (group PUI-EDTA and PUI-HEDP). The specimens were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy at 3, 5 and 8mm from the apex. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Bonferroni tests considering p> 0.05 as significant. RESULTS: PUI-EDTA was the most effective at removing the smear layer, with a statistically significant difference from XP-EDTA (p< 0.042) and group XP-HEDP (p< 0.003). There were no statistically significant differences among the other groups. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this ex vivo study, no activation system was able to completely remove the smear layer from the root canal walls. However, the combination of NaOCl with ultrasonically activated EDTA obtained better results than the other treatments. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8665438/ /pubmed/34904120 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.86680.1204 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License, ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Espinoza, Ismael
Conde Villar, Antonio Jesus
Loroño, Gaizka
Estevez, Roberto
Plotino, Gianluca
Cisneros, Rafael
Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation in the Removal of the Smear Layer Using two Different Chelating Agents
title Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation in the Removal of the Smear Layer Using two Different Chelating Agents
title_full Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation in the Removal of the Smear Layer Using two Different Chelating Agents
title_fullStr Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation in the Removal of the Smear Layer Using two Different Chelating Agents
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation in the Removal of the Smear Layer Using two Different Chelating Agents
title_short Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation in the Removal of the Smear Layer Using two Different Chelating Agents
title_sort effectiveness of xp-endo finisher and passive ultrasonic irrigation in the removal of the smear layer using two different chelating agents
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34904120
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.86680.1204
work_keys_str_mv AT espinozaismael effectivenessofxpendofinisherandpassiveultrasonicirrigationintheremovalofthesmearlayerusingtwodifferentchelatingagents
AT condevillarantoniojesus effectivenessofxpendofinisherandpassiveultrasonicirrigationintheremovalofthesmearlayerusingtwodifferentchelatingagents
AT loronogaizka effectivenessofxpendofinisherandpassiveultrasonicirrigationintheremovalofthesmearlayerusingtwodifferentchelatingagents
AT estevezroberto effectivenessofxpendofinisherandpassiveultrasonicirrigationintheremovalofthesmearlayerusingtwodifferentchelatingagents
AT plotinogianluca effectivenessofxpendofinisherandpassiveultrasonicirrigationintheremovalofthesmearlayerusingtwodifferentchelatingagents
AT cisnerosrafael effectivenessofxpendofinisherandpassiveultrasonicirrigationintheremovalofthesmearlayerusingtwodifferentchelatingagents