Cargando…
Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study
BACKGROUND: To compare the accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation. METHODS: A master cast containing 6 implant abutment replicas was fabricated. Group PG: digital impressions were taken 10 times using a photogram...
Autores principales: | Ma, Bowen, Yue, Xinxin, Sun, Yujie, Peng, Lingyan, Geng, Wei |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34893053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02005-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Evaluation of Intraoral Full-Arch Scan versus Conventional Preliminary Impression
por: Jánosi, Kinga Mária, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral digital impression system and conventional impression techniques for multiple implants in the full-arch edentulous mandible
por: Farhan, Firas-Abdulameer, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Accuracy of intraoral scanning versus conventional impressions for partial edentulous patients with maxillary defects
por: Cao, Rongkai, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Relationship between resolution and accuracy of four
intraoral scanners in complete-arch impressions
por: Medina-Sotomayor, Priscilla, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scans between complete-arch scan and quadrant scan
por: Moon, Youn-Gyeong, et al.
Publicado: (2020)