Cargando…

An Ideological Analysis of the Former President Donald Trump’s Tweets During COVID-19

This study aimed to explore the former US President Donald Trump’s representation of “us” and “others” in his tweets related to COVID-19 and how he portrayed the representation of “us” and “others”. In this study, the sample related to COVID-19 which ranged from January to May 2020, consisted of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Xue, He, Mei, Yu, Zhonggen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34926980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41701-021-00113-4
_version_ 1784614066295144448
author Luo, Xue
He, Mei
Yu, Zhonggen
author_facet Luo, Xue
He, Mei
Yu, Zhonggen
author_sort Luo, Xue
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to explore the former US President Donald Trump’s representation of “us” and “others” in his tweets related to COVID-19 and how he portrayed the representation of “us” and “others”. In this study, the sample related to COVID-19 which ranged from January to May 2020, consisted of the tweets posted by the former US President Donald Trump. To analyze the ideological discourse of the former President Donald Trump’s tweets during COVID-19, the ideological framework proposed by Van Dijk (Approaches to Media Discourse. Blackwell Publishing, 1997) was adopted to reveal the underlying intentions and ideologies of us-representation and others-representation. The results of this research indicate that Donald Trump portrayed a positive us-group and a negative others-group. Moreover, argumentation/authority, comparison, repetition, capitalization, and metaphors are the typical strategies that former President Trump used to portray both groups. It was also found that the positive opinions about the us-group and the negative ones about the others-group were not always consistent. For example, there were also changes when the same descriptions were given to both groups, which may well be coherent concerning the basic interests of the groups (Van Dijk, in: Approaches to Media Discourse. Blackwell Publishing, 1997). The findings of this study may contribute to an analysis of the president’s discourse on Twitter, which is a relatively recent channel for political information (Kerbleski, in: Trump, Twitter, and the trees: a critical discourse analysis of Donald Trump's tweets surrounding the november 2018 California Wildfires. Doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University, 2019).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8665714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86657142021-12-14 An Ideological Analysis of the Former President Donald Trump’s Tweets During COVID-19 Luo, Xue He, Mei Yu, Zhonggen Corpus Pragmat Original Paper This study aimed to explore the former US President Donald Trump’s representation of “us” and “others” in his tweets related to COVID-19 and how he portrayed the representation of “us” and “others”. In this study, the sample related to COVID-19 which ranged from January to May 2020, consisted of the tweets posted by the former US President Donald Trump. To analyze the ideological discourse of the former President Donald Trump’s tweets during COVID-19, the ideological framework proposed by Van Dijk (Approaches to Media Discourse. Blackwell Publishing, 1997) was adopted to reveal the underlying intentions and ideologies of us-representation and others-representation. The results of this research indicate that Donald Trump portrayed a positive us-group and a negative others-group. Moreover, argumentation/authority, comparison, repetition, capitalization, and metaphors are the typical strategies that former President Trump used to portray both groups. It was also found that the positive opinions about the us-group and the negative ones about the others-group were not always consistent. For example, there were also changes when the same descriptions were given to both groups, which may well be coherent concerning the basic interests of the groups (Van Dijk, in: Approaches to Media Discourse. Blackwell Publishing, 1997). The findings of this study may contribute to an analysis of the president’s discourse on Twitter, which is a relatively recent channel for political information (Kerbleski, in: Trump, Twitter, and the trees: a critical discourse analysis of Donald Trump's tweets surrounding the november 2018 California Wildfires. Doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University, 2019). Springer International Publishing 2021-12-11 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8665714/ /pubmed/34926980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41701-021-00113-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Luo, Xue
He, Mei
Yu, Zhonggen
An Ideological Analysis of the Former President Donald Trump’s Tweets During COVID-19
title An Ideological Analysis of the Former President Donald Trump’s Tweets During COVID-19
title_full An Ideological Analysis of the Former President Donald Trump’s Tweets During COVID-19
title_fullStr An Ideological Analysis of the Former President Donald Trump’s Tweets During COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed An Ideological Analysis of the Former President Donald Trump’s Tweets During COVID-19
title_short An Ideological Analysis of the Former President Donald Trump’s Tweets During COVID-19
title_sort ideological analysis of the former president donald trump’s tweets during covid-19
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34926980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41701-021-00113-4
work_keys_str_mv AT luoxue anideologicalanalysisoftheformerpresidentdonaldtrumpstweetsduringcovid19
AT hemei anideologicalanalysisoftheformerpresidentdonaldtrumpstweetsduringcovid19
AT yuzhonggen anideologicalanalysisoftheformerpresidentdonaldtrumpstweetsduringcovid19
AT luoxue ideologicalanalysisoftheformerpresidentdonaldtrumpstweetsduringcovid19
AT hemei ideologicalanalysisoftheformerpresidentdonaldtrumpstweetsduringcovid19
AT yuzhonggen ideologicalanalysisoftheformerpresidentdonaldtrumpstweetsduringcovid19