Cargando…

Comparison of the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between Chinese and Caucasian women undergoing in vitro fertilization using a standardized stimulation regime

BACKGROUND: In vitro fertilization (IVF) is a well-established method to treat various causes of infertility. Some previous retrospective studies suggested a lower ovarian response in Asian women compared to Caucasian women. However, the ovarian stimulation regimens were not standardized, potentiall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ko, Jennifer K. Y., Kan, Andrew, Leung, Peter, Lee, Vivian C. Y., Li, Raymond H. W., Ledger, William, Ng, Ernest H. Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34895264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-021-00928-4
_version_ 1784614123217092608
author Ko, Jennifer K. Y.
Kan, Andrew
Leung, Peter
Lee, Vivian C. Y.
Li, Raymond H. W.
Ledger, William
Ng, Ernest H. Y.
author_facet Ko, Jennifer K. Y.
Kan, Andrew
Leung, Peter
Lee, Vivian C. Y.
Li, Raymond H. W.
Ledger, William
Ng, Ernest H. Y.
author_sort Ko, Jennifer K. Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In vitro fertilization (IVF) is a well-established method to treat various causes of infertility. Some previous retrospective studies suggested a lower ovarian response in Asian women compared to Caucasian women. However, the ovarian stimulation regimens were not standardized, potentially confounding the findings. The objective of this study is to compare the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between Chinese and Caucasian women undergoing IVF using a standardized stimulation regimen. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study conducted in two tertiary IVF units in Hong Kong, China and Sydney, Australia from October 2016 to August 2019. A total of 192 women aged 18–42 years with a body weight > 60 kg underwent IVF with a standard ovarian stimulation regimen of 150 micrograms corifollitropin alfa (Elonva®) followed by 200 IU follitropin beta (Puregon®) per day. The number of oocytes retrieved in Chinese women treated in the Hong Kong center was compared to that of Caucasian women treated in the Australian center. RESULTS: Serum AMH levels were similar between the two groups. Although women in the Chinese cohort were older and had a higher body mass index (BMI), longer duration of infertility and lower antral follicle count (AFC) than those in the Caucasian cohort in this study, no differences in the number of oocytes retrieved [11 (8–17) vs. 11 (6–17), p=0.29], total dosage and duration of stimulation and number of follicles aspirated were noted between the two ethnic cohorts. The peak estradiol level was greater in Chinese women than in Caucasian women. After controlling for age, BMI and AFC, ethnicity was a significant independent determinant of the number of oocytes obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Chinese women had a higher number of oocytes after ovarian stimulation using a standardized stimulation regimen compared with Caucasian women undergoing IVF after controlling for age, BMI, AFC and AMH despite presenting later after a longer duration of infertility. Trial registration number: NCT02748278
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8666011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86660112021-12-13 Comparison of the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between Chinese and Caucasian women undergoing in vitro fertilization using a standardized stimulation regime Ko, Jennifer K. Y. Kan, Andrew Leung, Peter Lee, Vivian C. Y. Li, Raymond H. W. Ledger, William Ng, Ernest H. Y. J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: In vitro fertilization (IVF) is a well-established method to treat various causes of infertility. Some previous retrospective studies suggested a lower ovarian response in Asian women compared to Caucasian women. However, the ovarian stimulation regimens were not standardized, potentially confounding the findings. The objective of this study is to compare the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between Chinese and Caucasian women undergoing IVF using a standardized stimulation regimen. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study conducted in two tertiary IVF units in Hong Kong, China and Sydney, Australia from October 2016 to August 2019. A total of 192 women aged 18–42 years with a body weight > 60 kg underwent IVF with a standard ovarian stimulation regimen of 150 micrograms corifollitropin alfa (Elonva®) followed by 200 IU follitropin beta (Puregon®) per day. The number of oocytes retrieved in Chinese women treated in the Hong Kong center was compared to that of Caucasian women treated in the Australian center. RESULTS: Serum AMH levels were similar between the two groups. Although women in the Chinese cohort were older and had a higher body mass index (BMI), longer duration of infertility and lower antral follicle count (AFC) than those in the Caucasian cohort in this study, no differences in the number of oocytes retrieved [11 (8–17) vs. 11 (6–17), p=0.29], total dosage and duration of stimulation and number of follicles aspirated were noted between the two ethnic cohorts. The peak estradiol level was greater in Chinese women than in Caucasian women. After controlling for age, BMI and AFC, ethnicity was a significant independent determinant of the number of oocytes obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Chinese women had a higher number of oocytes after ovarian stimulation using a standardized stimulation regimen compared with Caucasian women undergoing IVF after controlling for age, BMI, AFC and AMH despite presenting later after a longer duration of infertility. Trial registration number: NCT02748278 BioMed Central 2021-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8666011/ /pubmed/34895264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-021-00928-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ko, Jennifer K. Y.
Kan, Andrew
Leung, Peter
Lee, Vivian C. Y.
Li, Raymond H. W.
Ledger, William
Ng, Ernest H. Y.
Comparison of the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between Chinese and Caucasian women undergoing in vitro fertilization using a standardized stimulation regime
title Comparison of the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between Chinese and Caucasian women undergoing in vitro fertilization using a standardized stimulation regime
title_full Comparison of the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between Chinese and Caucasian women undergoing in vitro fertilization using a standardized stimulation regime
title_fullStr Comparison of the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between Chinese and Caucasian women undergoing in vitro fertilization using a standardized stimulation regime
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between Chinese and Caucasian women undergoing in vitro fertilization using a standardized stimulation regime
title_short Comparison of the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between Chinese and Caucasian women undergoing in vitro fertilization using a standardized stimulation regime
title_sort comparison of the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between chinese and caucasian women undergoing in vitro fertilization using a standardized stimulation regime
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34895264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-021-00928-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kojenniferky comparisonofthenumberofoocytesobtainedafterovarianstimulationbetweenchineseandcaucasianwomenundergoinginvitrofertilizationusingastandardizedstimulationregime
AT kanandrew comparisonofthenumberofoocytesobtainedafterovarianstimulationbetweenchineseandcaucasianwomenundergoinginvitrofertilizationusingastandardizedstimulationregime
AT leungpeter comparisonofthenumberofoocytesobtainedafterovarianstimulationbetweenchineseandcaucasianwomenundergoinginvitrofertilizationusingastandardizedstimulationregime
AT leeviviancy comparisonofthenumberofoocytesobtainedafterovarianstimulationbetweenchineseandcaucasianwomenundergoinginvitrofertilizationusingastandardizedstimulationregime
AT liraymondhw comparisonofthenumberofoocytesobtainedafterovarianstimulationbetweenchineseandcaucasianwomenundergoinginvitrofertilizationusingastandardizedstimulationregime
AT ledgerwilliam comparisonofthenumberofoocytesobtainedafterovarianstimulationbetweenchineseandcaucasianwomenundergoinginvitrofertilizationusingastandardizedstimulationregime
AT ngernesthy comparisonofthenumberofoocytesobtainedafterovarianstimulationbetweenchineseandcaucasianwomenundergoinginvitrofertilizationusingastandardizedstimulationregime