Cargando…

Evaluation of two RT-PCR techniques for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in serum for microbiological diagnosis

Presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in serum (viremia) of COVID-19 patients has been related to poor prognosis and death. The aim of this study was to evaluate both the ability to detect viremia in COVID-19 patients of two commercial reverse real-time-PCR (rRT-PCR) tests, Cobas® and TaqPath™, comparing them...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martín Ramírez, Alexandra, Zurita Cruz, Nelly Daniela, Gutiérrez-Cobos, Ainhoa, Rodríguez Serrano, Diego Aníbal, González Álvaro, Isidoro, Roy Vallejo, Emilia, Gómez de Frutos, Sara, Fontán García-Rodrigo, Leticia, Cardeñoso Domingo, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34910983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114411
_version_ 1784614142979604480
author Martín Ramírez, Alexandra
Zurita Cruz, Nelly Daniela
Gutiérrez-Cobos, Ainhoa
Rodríguez Serrano, Diego Aníbal
González Álvaro, Isidoro
Roy Vallejo, Emilia
Gómez de Frutos, Sara
Fontán García-Rodrigo, Leticia
Cardeñoso Domingo, Laura
author_facet Martín Ramírez, Alexandra
Zurita Cruz, Nelly Daniela
Gutiérrez-Cobos, Ainhoa
Rodríguez Serrano, Diego Aníbal
González Álvaro, Isidoro
Roy Vallejo, Emilia
Gómez de Frutos, Sara
Fontán García-Rodrigo, Leticia
Cardeñoso Domingo, Laura
author_sort Martín Ramírez, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description Presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in serum (viremia) of COVID-19 patients has been related to poor prognosis and death. The aim of this study was to evaluate both the ability to detect viremia in COVID-19 patients of two commercial reverse real-time-PCR (rRT-PCR) tests, Cobas® and TaqPath™, comparing them with a gold standard method, and their implementation in microbiology laboratories. This retrospective cohort study included 303 adult patients (203 diagnosed with COVID-19 and 100 non-COVID-19 patients) admitted to a tertiary hospital, with at least one serum sample collected within the first 48 h from admission. A total of 365 serum samples were included: 100 from non-COVID patients (pre-pandemic and pandemic control groups) and 265 from COVID-19 patients. Serum samples were considered positive when at least one target was detected. All patients in control groups showed negative viremia. Cobas® and TaqPath™ tests showed specificity and Positive Predictive Value over 96%. Nevertheless, sensitivity (53.72 and 73.63, respectively) and Negative Predictive Value (64.78 and 75) were lower. Viremia difference between ICU and non-ICU patients was significant (p ≤ 0.001) for both techniques. Consequently, SARS-CoV-2 viremia detection by both rRT-PCR tests should be considered a good tool to stratify COVID-19 patients and could be implemented in microbiology laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8666146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86661462021-12-14 Evaluation of two RT-PCR techniques for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in serum for microbiological diagnosis Martín Ramírez, Alexandra Zurita Cruz, Nelly Daniela Gutiérrez-Cobos, Ainhoa Rodríguez Serrano, Diego Aníbal González Álvaro, Isidoro Roy Vallejo, Emilia Gómez de Frutos, Sara Fontán García-Rodrigo, Leticia Cardeñoso Domingo, Laura J Virol Methods Protocols Presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in serum (viremia) of COVID-19 patients has been related to poor prognosis and death. The aim of this study was to evaluate both the ability to detect viremia in COVID-19 patients of two commercial reverse real-time-PCR (rRT-PCR) tests, Cobas® and TaqPath™, comparing them with a gold standard method, and their implementation in microbiology laboratories. This retrospective cohort study included 303 adult patients (203 diagnosed with COVID-19 and 100 non-COVID-19 patients) admitted to a tertiary hospital, with at least one serum sample collected within the first 48 h from admission. A total of 365 serum samples were included: 100 from non-COVID patients (pre-pandemic and pandemic control groups) and 265 from COVID-19 patients. Serum samples were considered positive when at least one target was detected. All patients in control groups showed negative viremia. Cobas® and TaqPath™ tests showed specificity and Positive Predictive Value over 96%. Nevertheless, sensitivity (53.72 and 73.63, respectively) and Negative Predictive Value (64.78 and 75) were lower. Viremia difference between ICU and non-ICU patients was significant (p ≤ 0.001) for both techniques. Consequently, SARS-CoV-2 viremia detection by both rRT-PCR tests should be considered a good tool to stratify COVID-19 patients and could be implemented in microbiology laboratories. Elsevier B.V. 2022-02 2021-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8666146/ /pubmed/34910983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114411 Text en © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Protocols
Martín Ramírez, Alexandra
Zurita Cruz, Nelly Daniela
Gutiérrez-Cobos, Ainhoa
Rodríguez Serrano, Diego Aníbal
González Álvaro, Isidoro
Roy Vallejo, Emilia
Gómez de Frutos, Sara
Fontán García-Rodrigo, Leticia
Cardeñoso Domingo, Laura
Evaluation of two RT-PCR techniques for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in serum for microbiological diagnosis
title Evaluation of two RT-PCR techniques for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in serum for microbiological diagnosis
title_full Evaluation of two RT-PCR techniques for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in serum for microbiological diagnosis
title_fullStr Evaluation of two RT-PCR techniques for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in serum for microbiological diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of two RT-PCR techniques for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in serum for microbiological diagnosis
title_short Evaluation of two RT-PCR techniques for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in serum for microbiological diagnosis
title_sort evaluation of two rt-pcr techniques for sars-cov-2 rna detection in serum for microbiological diagnosis
topic Protocols
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34910983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114411
work_keys_str_mv AT martinramirezalexandra evaluationoftwortpcrtechniquesforsarscov2rnadetectioninserumformicrobiologicaldiagnosis
AT zuritacruznellydaniela evaluationoftwortpcrtechniquesforsarscov2rnadetectioninserumformicrobiologicaldiagnosis
AT gutierrezcobosainhoa evaluationoftwortpcrtechniquesforsarscov2rnadetectioninserumformicrobiologicaldiagnosis
AT rodriguezserranodiegoanibal evaluationoftwortpcrtechniquesforsarscov2rnadetectioninserumformicrobiologicaldiagnosis
AT gonzalezalvaroisidoro evaluationoftwortpcrtechniquesforsarscov2rnadetectioninserumformicrobiologicaldiagnosis
AT royvallejoemilia evaluationoftwortpcrtechniquesforsarscov2rnadetectioninserumformicrobiologicaldiagnosis
AT gomezdefrutossara evaluationoftwortpcrtechniquesforsarscov2rnadetectioninserumformicrobiologicaldiagnosis
AT fontangarciarodrigoleticia evaluationoftwortpcrtechniquesforsarscov2rnadetectioninserumformicrobiologicaldiagnosis
AT cardenosodomingolaura evaluationoftwortpcrtechniquesforsarscov2rnadetectioninserumformicrobiologicaldiagnosis