Cargando…

Musculoskeletal pain and sedentary behaviour in occupational and non-occupational settings: a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Sedentary behaviour (SB; time spent sitting) is associated with musculoskeletal pain (MSP) conditions; however, no prior systematic review has examined these associations according to SB domains. We synthesised evidence on occupational and non-occupational SB and MSP conditions. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dzakpasu, Francis Q. S., Carver, Alison, Brakenridge, Christian J., Cicuttini, Flavia, Urquhart, Donna M., Owen, Neville, Dunstan, David W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34895248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01191-y
_version_ 1784614171885699072
author Dzakpasu, Francis Q. S.
Carver, Alison
Brakenridge, Christian J.
Cicuttini, Flavia
Urquhart, Donna M.
Owen, Neville
Dunstan, David W.
author_facet Dzakpasu, Francis Q. S.
Carver, Alison
Brakenridge, Christian J.
Cicuttini, Flavia
Urquhart, Donna M.
Owen, Neville
Dunstan, David W.
author_sort Dzakpasu, Francis Q. S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sedentary behaviour (SB; time spent sitting) is associated with musculoskeletal pain (MSP) conditions; however, no prior systematic review has examined these associations according to SB domains. We synthesised evidence on occupational and non-occupational SB and MSP conditions. METHODS: Guided by a PRISMA protocol, eight databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus, and AMED) and three grey literature sources (Google Scholar, WorldChat, and Trove) were searched (January 1, 2000, to March 17, 2021) for original quantitative studies of adults ≥ 18 years. Clinical-condition studies were excluded. Studies’ risk of bias was assessed using the QualSyst checklist. For meta-analyses, random effect inverse-variance pooled effect size was estimated; otherwise, best-evidence synthesis was used for narrative review. RESULTS: Of 178 potentially-eligible studies, 79 were included [24 general population; 55 occupational (incuding15 experimental/intervention)]; 56 studies were of high quality, with scores > 0.75. Data for 26 were meta-synthesised. For cross-sectional studies of non-occupational SB, meta-analysis showed full-day SB to be associated with low back pain [LBP – OR = 1.19(1.03 – 1.38)]. Narrative synthesis found full-day SB associations with knee pain, arthritis, and general MSP, but the evidence was insufficient on associations with neck/shoulder pain, hip pain, and upper extremities pain. Evidence of prospective associations of full-day SB with MSP conditions was insufficient. Also, there was insufficient evidence on both cross-sectional and prospective associations between leisure-time SB and MSP conditions. For occupational SB, cross-sectional studies meta-analysed indicated associations of self-reported workplace sitting with LBP [OR = 1.47(1.12 – 1.92)] and neck/shoulder pain [OR = 1.73(1.46 – 2.03)], but not with extremities pain [OR = 1.17(0.65 – 2.11)]. Best-evidence synthesis identified inconsistent findings on cross-sectional association and a probable negative prospective association of device-measured workplace sitting with LBP-intensity in tradespeople. There was cross-sectional evidence on the association of computer time with neck/shoulder pain, but insufficient evidence for LBP and general MSP. Experimental/intervention evidence indicated reduced LBP, neck/shoulder pain, and general MSP with reducing workplace sitting. CONCLUSIONS: We found cross-sectional associations of occupational and non-occupational SB with MSP conditions, with occupational SB associations being occupation dependent, however, reverse causality bias cannot be ruled out. While prospective evidence was inconclusive, reducing workplace sitting was associated with reduced MSP conditions. Future studies should emphasise prospective analyses and examining potential interactions with chronic diseases. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID #CRD42020166412 (Amended to limit the scope) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-021-01191-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8666269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86662692021-12-13 Musculoskeletal pain and sedentary behaviour in occupational and non-occupational settings: a systematic review with meta-analysis Dzakpasu, Francis Q. S. Carver, Alison Brakenridge, Christian J. Cicuttini, Flavia Urquhart, Donna M. Owen, Neville Dunstan, David W. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Review BACKGROUND: Sedentary behaviour (SB; time spent sitting) is associated with musculoskeletal pain (MSP) conditions; however, no prior systematic review has examined these associations according to SB domains. We synthesised evidence on occupational and non-occupational SB and MSP conditions. METHODS: Guided by a PRISMA protocol, eight databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus, and AMED) and three grey literature sources (Google Scholar, WorldChat, and Trove) were searched (January 1, 2000, to March 17, 2021) for original quantitative studies of adults ≥ 18 years. Clinical-condition studies were excluded. Studies’ risk of bias was assessed using the QualSyst checklist. For meta-analyses, random effect inverse-variance pooled effect size was estimated; otherwise, best-evidence synthesis was used for narrative review. RESULTS: Of 178 potentially-eligible studies, 79 were included [24 general population; 55 occupational (incuding15 experimental/intervention)]; 56 studies were of high quality, with scores > 0.75. Data for 26 were meta-synthesised. For cross-sectional studies of non-occupational SB, meta-analysis showed full-day SB to be associated with low back pain [LBP – OR = 1.19(1.03 – 1.38)]. Narrative synthesis found full-day SB associations with knee pain, arthritis, and general MSP, but the evidence was insufficient on associations with neck/shoulder pain, hip pain, and upper extremities pain. Evidence of prospective associations of full-day SB with MSP conditions was insufficient. Also, there was insufficient evidence on both cross-sectional and prospective associations between leisure-time SB and MSP conditions. For occupational SB, cross-sectional studies meta-analysed indicated associations of self-reported workplace sitting with LBP [OR = 1.47(1.12 – 1.92)] and neck/shoulder pain [OR = 1.73(1.46 – 2.03)], but not with extremities pain [OR = 1.17(0.65 – 2.11)]. Best-evidence synthesis identified inconsistent findings on cross-sectional association and a probable negative prospective association of device-measured workplace sitting with LBP-intensity in tradespeople. There was cross-sectional evidence on the association of computer time with neck/shoulder pain, but insufficient evidence for LBP and general MSP. Experimental/intervention evidence indicated reduced LBP, neck/shoulder pain, and general MSP with reducing workplace sitting. CONCLUSIONS: We found cross-sectional associations of occupational and non-occupational SB with MSP conditions, with occupational SB associations being occupation dependent, however, reverse causality bias cannot be ruled out. While prospective evidence was inconclusive, reducing workplace sitting was associated with reduced MSP conditions. Future studies should emphasise prospective analyses and examining potential interactions with chronic diseases. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID #CRD42020166412 (Amended to limit the scope) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12966-021-01191-y. BioMed Central 2021-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8666269/ /pubmed/34895248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01191-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Dzakpasu, Francis Q. S.
Carver, Alison
Brakenridge, Christian J.
Cicuttini, Flavia
Urquhart, Donna M.
Owen, Neville
Dunstan, David W.
Musculoskeletal pain and sedentary behaviour in occupational and non-occupational settings: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title Musculoskeletal pain and sedentary behaviour in occupational and non-occupational settings: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full Musculoskeletal pain and sedentary behaviour in occupational and non-occupational settings: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_fullStr Musculoskeletal pain and sedentary behaviour in occupational and non-occupational settings: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Musculoskeletal pain and sedentary behaviour in occupational and non-occupational settings: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_short Musculoskeletal pain and sedentary behaviour in occupational and non-occupational settings: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_sort musculoskeletal pain and sedentary behaviour in occupational and non-occupational settings: a systematic review with meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34895248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01191-y
work_keys_str_mv AT dzakpasufrancisqs musculoskeletalpainandsedentarybehaviourinoccupationalandnonoccupationalsettingsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT carveralison musculoskeletalpainandsedentarybehaviourinoccupationalandnonoccupationalsettingsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT brakenridgechristianj musculoskeletalpainandsedentarybehaviourinoccupationalandnonoccupationalsettingsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT cicuttiniflavia musculoskeletalpainandsedentarybehaviourinoccupationalandnonoccupationalsettingsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT urquhartdonnam musculoskeletalpainandsedentarybehaviourinoccupationalandnonoccupationalsettingsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT owenneville musculoskeletalpainandsedentarybehaviourinoccupationalandnonoccupationalsettingsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT dunstandavidw musculoskeletalpainandsedentarybehaviourinoccupationalandnonoccupationalsettingsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis