Cargando…
Development of an Eight-gene Prognostic Model for Overall Survival Prediction in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The overall survival (OS) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains dismal. Bioinformatic analysis of transcriptome data could identify patients with poor OS and may facilitate clinical decision. This study aimed to develop a prognostic gene model for HCC. METHODS: GSE14520 was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
XIA & HE Publishing Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966653 http://dx.doi.org/10.14218/JCTH.2020.00152 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The overall survival (OS) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains dismal. Bioinformatic analysis of transcriptome data could identify patients with poor OS and may facilitate clinical decision. This study aimed to develop a prognostic gene model for HCC. METHODS: GSE14520 was retrieved as a training set to identify differential expressed genes (DEGs) between tumor and adjacent liver tissues in HCC patients with different OS. A DEG-based prognostic model was then constructed and the TCGA-LIHC and ICGC-LIRI datasets were used to validate the model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and hazard ratio (HR) of the model for OS were calculated. A model-based nomogram was established and verified. RESULTS: In the training set, differential expression analysis identified 80 genes dysregulated in oxidation-reduction and metabolism regulation. After univariate Cox and LASSO regression, eight genes (LPCAT1, DHRS1, SORBS2, ALDH5A1, SULT1C2, SPP1, HEY1 and GOLM1) were selected to build the prognostic model. The AUC for 1-, 3- and 5-year OS were 0.779, 0.736, 0.754 in training set and 0.693, 0.689, 0.693 in the TCGA-LIHC validation set, respectively. The AUC for 1- and 3-year OS were 0.767 and 0.705 in the ICGC-LIRI validation set. Multivariate analysis confirmed the model was an independent prognostic factor (training set: HR=4.422, p<0.001; TCGA-LIHC validation set: HR=2.561, p<0.001; ICGC-LIRI validation set: HR=3.931, p<0.001). Furthermore, a nomogram combining the model and AJCC stage was established and validated, showing increased OS predictive efficacy compared with the prognostic model (p=0.035) or AJCC stage (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our eight-gene prognostic model and the related nomogram represent as reliable prognostic tools for OS prediction in HCC patients. |
---|