Cargando…
Initial experience in staging primary oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancer with 18F-FDG PET/MRI
BACKGROUND: (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (18F-FDG PET/MRI) may improve cancer staging by combining sensitive cancer detection with high-contrast resolution and detail. We compared the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/MRI to (18)F-fluorodeoxygl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34897589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-021-00117-y |
_version_ | 1784614198191325184 |
---|---|
author | Sharkey, Amy R. Sah, Bert-Ram Withey, Samuel J. Bhuva, Shaheel Neji, Radhouene Jeljeli, Sami Green, Adrian Cook, Gary J. R. Goh, Vicky |
author_facet | Sharkey, Amy R. Sah, Bert-Ram Withey, Samuel J. Bhuva, Shaheel Neji, Radhouene Jeljeli, Sami Green, Adrian Cook, Gary J. R. Goh, Vicky |
author_sort | Sharkey, Amy R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (18F-FDG PET/MRI) may improve cancer staging by combining sensitive cancer detection with high-contrast resolution and detail. We compared the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/MRI to (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) for staging oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancer. Following ethical approval and informed consent, participants with newly diagnosed primary oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancer were enrolled. Exclusions included prior/concurrent malignancy. Following 324 ± 28 MBq 18F-FDG administration and 60-min uptake, PET/CT was performed, immediately followed by integrated PET/MRI from skull base to mid-thigh. PET/CT was interpreted by two dual-accredited nuclear medicine physicians and PET/MRI by a dual-accredited nuclear medicine physician/radiologist and cancer radiologist in consensus. Per-participant staging was compared with the tumour board consensus staging using the McNemar test, with statistical significance at 5%. RESULTS: Out of 26 participants, 22 (20 males; mean ± SD age 68.8 ± 8.7 years) completed 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI. Compared to the tumour board, the primary tumour was staged concordantly in 55% (12/22) with PET/MRI and 36% (8/22) with PET/CT; the nodal stage was concordant in 45% (10/22) with PET/MRI and 50% (11/22) with PET/CT. There was no statistical difference in PET/CT and PET/MRI staging performance (p > 0.05, for T and N staging). The staging of distant metastases was concordant with the tumour board in 95% (21/22) with both PET/MRI and PET/CT. Of participants with distant metastatic disease, PET/MRI detected additional metastases in 30% (3/10). CONCLUSION: In this preliminary study, compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT, 18F-FDG PET/MRI showed non-significant higher concordance with T-staging, but no difference with N or M-staging. Additional metastases detected by 18F-FDG PET/MRI may be of additive clinical value. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41824-021-00117-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8666393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86663932021-12-27 Initial experience in staging primary oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancer with 18F-FDG PET/MRI Sharkey, Amy R. Sah, Bert-Ram Withey, Samuel J. Bhuva, Shaheel Neji, Radhouene Jeljeli, Sami Green, Adrian Cook, Gary J. R. Goh, Vicky Eur J Hybrid Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (18F-FDG PET/MRI) may improve cancer staging by combining sensitive cancer detection with high-contrast resolution and detail. We compared the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/MRI to (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) for staging oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancer. Following ethical approval and informed consent, participants with newly diagnosed primary oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancer were enrolled. Exclusions included prior/concurrent malignancy. Following 324 ± 28 MBq 18F-FDG administration and 60-min uptake, PET/CT was performed, immediately followed by integrated PET/MRI from skull base to mid-thigh. PET/CT was interpreted by two dual-accredited nuclear medicine physicians and PET/MRI by a dual-accredited nuclear medicine physician/radiologist and cancer radiologist in consensus. Per-participant staging was compared with the tumour board consensus staging using the McNemar test, with statistical significance at 5%. RESULTS: Out of 26 participants, 22 (20 males; mean ± SD age 68.8 ± 8.7 years) completed 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI. Compared to the tumour board, the primary tumour was staged concordantly in 55% (12/22) with PET/MRI and 36% (8/22) with PET/CT; the nodal stage was concordant in 45% (10/22) with PET/MRI and 50% (11/22) with PET/CT. There was no statistical difference in PET/CT and PET/MRI staging performance (p > 0.05, for T and N staging). The staging of distant metastases was concordant with the tumour board in 95% (21/22) with both PET/MRI and PET/CT. Of participants with distant metastatic disease, PET/MRI detected additional metastases in 30% (3/10). CONCLUSION: In this preliminary study, compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT, 18F-FDG PET/MRI showed non-significant higher concordance with T-staging, but no difference with N or M-staging. Additional metastases detected by 18F-FDG PET/MRI may be of additive clinical value. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41824-021-00117-y. Springer International Publishing 2021-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8666393/ /pubmed/34897589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-021-00117-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sharkey, Amy R. Sah, Bert-Ram Withey, Samuel J. Bhuva, Shaheel Neji, Radhouene Jeljeli, Sami Green, Adrian Cook, Gary J. R. Goh, Vicky Initial experience in staging primary oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancer with 18F-FDG PET/MRI |
title | Initial experience in staging primary oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancer with 18F-FDG PET/MRI |
title_full | Initial experience in staging primary oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancer with 18F-FDG PET/MRI |
title_fullStr | Initial experience in staging primary oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancer with 18F-FDG PET/MRI |
title_full_unstemmed | Initial experience in staging primary oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancer with 18F-FDG PET/MRI |
title_short | Initial experience in staging primary oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancer with 18F-FDG PET/MRI |
title_sort | initial experience in staging primary oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancer with 18f-fdg pet/mri |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34897589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-021-00117-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharkeyamyr initialexperienceinstagingprimaryoesophagealgastrooesophagealcancerwith18ffdgpetmri AT sahbertram initialexperienceinstagingprimaryoesophagealgastrooesophagealcancerwith18ffdgpetmri AT witheysamuelj initialexperienceinstagingprimaryoesophagealgastrooesophagealcancerwith18ffdgpetmri AT bhuvashaheel initialexperienceinstagingprimaryoesophagealgastrooesophagealcancerwith18ffdgpetmri AT nejiradhouene initialexperienceinstagingprimaryoesophagealgastrooesophagealcancerwith18ffdgpetmri AT jeljelisami initialexperienceinstagingprimaryoesophagealgastrooesophagealcancerwith18ffdgpetmri AT greenadrian initialexperienceinstagingprimaryoesophagealgastrooesophagealcancerwith18ffdgpetmri AT cookgaryjr initialexperienceinstagingprimaryoesophagealgastrooesophagealcancerwith18ffdgpetmri AT gohvicky initialexperienceinstagingprimaryoesophagealgastrooesophagealcancerwith18ffdgpetmri AT initialexperienceinstagingprimaryoesophagealgastrooesophagealcancerwith18ffdgpetmri |