Cargando…
Effectiveness of the population-based ‘check your health preventive programme’ conducted in a primary care setting: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Health checks have been suggested as an early detection approach aiming at lowering the risk of chronic disease development. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a health check programme offered to the general population, aged 30–49 years. METHODS: The entire population aged...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34145078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2021-216581 |
_version_ | 1784614275583574016 |
---|---|
author | Bjerregaard, Anne-Louise Dalsgaard, Else-Marie Bruun, Niels-Henrik Norman, Kasper Witte, Daniel R Stovring, Henrik Maindal, Helle Terkildsen Sandbæk, Annelli |
author_facet | Bjerregaard, Anne-Louise Dalsgaard, Else-Marie Bruun, Niels-Henrik Norman, Kasper Witte, Daniel R Stovring, Henrik Maindal, Helle Terkildsen Sandbæk, Annelli |
author_sort | Bjerregaard, Anne-Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health checks have been suggested as an early detection approach aiming at lowering the risk of chronic disease development. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a health check programme offered to the general population, aged 30–49 years. METHODS: The entire population aged 30–49 years (N=26 216) living in the municipality of Randers, Denmark, was invited to a health check during 5 years. A pragmatic household cluster-randomised controlled trial was conducted in 10 505 citizens. The intervention group (IG, N=5250) included citizens randomised to the second year and reinvited in the 5th year. The comparison group (CG, N=5255) included citizens randomised to the 5th year. Outcomes were modelled cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk; self-reported physical activity (PA) and objectively measured cardio respiratory fitness (CRF); self-rated health (short-form 12 (SF-12)), self-rated mental health (SF-12_Mental Component Score (MCS)) and, registry information on sick-leave and employment. Due to low participation, we compared groups matched on propensity scores for participation when reinvited. RESULTS: Participation in the first health check was 51% (N=2698) in the IG and 40% (N=2120) in the CG. In the IG 26% (N=1340) participated in both the first and second health checks. No intervention effects were found comparing IG and CG. Mean differences were (95% CI): modelled CVD risk: −0.052 (95% CI −0.107 to 0.003)%, PA: −0.156 (−0.331 to 0.019) days/week with 30 min moderate PA, CRF: 0.133 (−0.560 to 0.826) mL O(2)/min/kg, SF-12: −0.003 (−0.032 to 0.026), SF-12_MCS: 0.355 (-0.423 to 1.132), sick leave periods ≥3 weeks: −0.004 (−0.025 to 0.017), employment: −0.004 (−0.032 to 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Preventive health checks offered to the general population, aged 30–49 years, had no effects on a wide range of indicators of chronic disease risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02028195. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8666817 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86668172021-12-28 Effectiveness of the population-based ‘check your health preventive programme’ conducted in a primary care setting: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial Bjerregaard, Anne-Louise Dalsgaard, Else-Marie Bruun, Niels-Henrik Norman, Kasper Witte, Daniel R Stovring, Henrik Maindal, Helle Terkildsen Sandbæk, Annelli J Epidemiol Community Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Health checks have been suggested as an early detection approach aiming at lowering the risk of chronic disease development. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a health check programme offered to the general population, aged 30–49 years. METHODS: The entire population aged 30–49 years (N=26 216) living in the municipality of Randers, Denmark, was invited to a health check during 5 years. A pragmatic household cluster-randomised controlled trial was conducted in 10 505 citizens. The intervention group (IG, N=5250) included citizens randomised to the second year and reinvited in the 5th year. The comparison group (CG, N=5255) included citizens randomised to the 5th year. Outcomes were modelled cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk; self-reported physical activity (PA) and objectively measured cardio respiratory fitness (CRF); self-rated health (short-form 12 (SF-12)), self-rated mental health (SF-12_Mental Component Score (MCS)) and, registry information on sick-leave and employment. Due to low participation, we compared groups matched on propensity scores for participation when reinvited. RESULTS: Participation in the first health check was 51% (N=2698) in the IG and 40% (N=2120) in the CG. In the IG 26% (N=1340) participated in both the first and second health checks. No intervention effects were found comparing IG and CG. Mean differences were (95% CI): modelled CVD risk: −0.052 (95% CI −0.107 to 0.003)%, PA: −0.156 (−0.331 to 0.019) days/week with 30 min moderate PA, CRF: 0.133 (−0.560 to 0.826) mL O(2)/min/kg, SF-12: −0.003 (−0.032 to 0.026), SF-12_MCS: 0.355 (-0.423 to 1.132), sick leave periods ≥3 weeks: −0.004 (−0.025 to 0.017), employment: −0.004 (−0.032 to 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Preventive health checks offered to the general population, aged 30–49 years, had no effects on a wide range of indicators of chronic disease risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02028195. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01 2021-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8666817/ /pubmed/34145078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2021-216581 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bjerregaard, Anne-Louise Dalsgaard, Else-Marie Bruun, Niels-Henrik Norman, Kasper Witte, Daniel R Stovring, Henrik Maindal, Helle Terkildsen Sandbæk, Annelli Effectiveness of the population-based ‘check your health preventive programme’ conducted in a primary care setting: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
title | Effectiveness of the population-based ‘check your health preventive programme’ conducted in a primary care setting: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Effectiveness of the population-based ‘check your health preventive programme’ conducted in a primary care setting: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of the population-based ‘check your health preventive programme’ conducted in a primary care setting: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of the population-based ‘check your health preventive programme’ conducted in a primary care setting: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Effectiveness of the population-based ‘check your health preventive programme’ conducted in a primary care setting: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of the population-based ‘check your health preventive programme’ conducted in a primary care setting: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666817/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34145078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2021-216581 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bjerregaardannelouise effectivenessofthepopulationbasedcheckyourhealthpreventiveprogrammeconductedinaprimarycaresettingapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dalsgaardelsemarie effectivenessofthepopulationbasedcheckyourhealthpreventiveprogrammeconductedinaprimarycaresettingapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bruunnielshenrik effectivenessofthepopulationbasedcheckyourhealthpreventiveprogrammeconductedinaprimarycaresettingapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT normankasper effectivenessofthepopulationbasedcheckyourhealthpreventiveprogrammeconductedinaprimarycaresettingapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wittedanielr effectivenessofthepopulationbasedcheckyourhealthpreventiveprogrammeconductedinaprimarycaresettingapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT stovringhenrik effectivenessofthepopulationbasedcheckyourhealthpreventiveprogrammeconductedinaprimarycaresettingapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT maindalhelleterkildsen effectivenessofthepopulationbasedcheckyourhealthpreventiveprogrammeconductedinaprimarycaresettingapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sandbækannelli effectivenessofthepopulationbasedcheckyourhealthpreventiveprogrammeconductedinaprimarycaresettingapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial |