Cargando…

Discordance between family report and clinical assessment of suicide attempts: a prospective study from the emergency department

BACKGROUND: Developing accurate identification methods for individuals with suicide attempts and providing them with follow-up care and supports can be a vital component of all comprehensive suicide prevention strategies. However, because of the difficulties concerning one’s intentions behind injuri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Yue, Zhang, Haiyin, Fan, Qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34970640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2021-100576
_version_ 1784614287857156096
author Zheng, Yue
Zhang, Haiyin
Fan, Qing
author_facet Zheng, Yue
Zhang, Haiyin
Fan, Qing
author_sort Zheng, Yue
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Developing accurate identification methods for individuals with suicide attempts and providing them with follow-up care and supports can be a vital component of all comprehensive suicide prevention strategies. However, because of the difficulties concerning one’s intentions behind injurious behaviour, identifying suicide attempts is a challenge for families and clinicians. AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the differences between family report and clinical assessment for suicide attempts in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: A total of 148 patients with suspected suicide attempts (SSAs) and 148 family caregivers in the ED were enrolled. The suicide risk module of the Chinese version of the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview and the self-report measure were used to assess those with SSA’s suicidal behaviours. The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales and semi-structured interviews were used to investigate the characteristics of suicide risk and demographics of patients with SSA, as well as the rate and influencing factors of omitted suicide attempts reported by family caregivers. RESULTS: The underreporting rate for family reported suicide attempts in the ED was 69.0%. The suicide attempts group indicated lower mean scores on perceptions of family resources, adaptability and cohesion. Patients' suicide risk rating (OR=0.152, 95% CI: 0.037 to 0.620, p=0.009), adult-children relationship (OR=5.037, 95% CI: 1.478 to 17.167, p=0.010) and caregiver’s age (OR=0.279, 95% CI: 0.103 to 0.757, p=0.012) might be associated with underreporting by families. If patients committed suicide attempts through a falling injury or medication overdose, their families may have misreported the suicide attempt. CONCLUSIONS: The discordance of suicide attempt records between family report and clinical assessment reveals the limitations of family self-reports when identifying suicide attempts. Interviews and observations, together with information from certain diagnoses, should be combined to accurately identify suicide attempters in the ED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8666883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86668832021-12-29 Discordance between family report and clinical assessment of suicide attempts: a prospective study from the emergency department Zheng, Yue Zhang, Haiyin Fan, Qing Gen Psychiatr Original Research BACKGROUND: Developing accurate identification methods for individuals with suicide attempts and providing them with follow-up care and supports can be a vital component of all comprehensive suicide prevention strategies. However, because of the difficulties concerning one’s intentions behind injurious behaviour, identifying suicide attempts is a challenge for families and clinicians. AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the differences between family report and clinical assessment for suicide attempts in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: A total of 148 patients with suspected suicide attempts (SSAs) and 148 family caregivers in the ED were enrolled. The suicide risk module of the Chinese version of the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview and the self-report measure were used to assess those with SSA’s suicidal behaviours. The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales and semi-structured interviews were used to investigate the characteristics of suicide risk and demographics of patients with SSA, as well as the rate and influencing factors of omitted suicide attempts reported by family caregivers. RESULTS: The underreporting rate for family reported suicide attempts in the ED was 69.0%. The suicide attempts group indicated lower mean scores on perceptions of family resources, adaptability and cohesion. Patients' suicide risk rating (OR=0.152, 95% CI: 0.037 to 0.620, p=0.009), adult-children relationship (OR=5.037, 95% CI: 1.478 to 17.167, p=0.010) and caregiver’s age (OR=0.279, 95% CI: 0.103 to 0.757, p=0.012) might be associated with underreporting by families. If patients committed suicide attempts through a falling injury or medication overdose, their families may have misreported the suicide attempt. CONCLUSIONS: The discordance of suicide attempt records between family report and clinical assessment reveals the limitations of family self-reports when identifying suicide attempts. Interviews and observations, together with information from certain diagnoses, should be combined to accurately identify suicide attempters in the ED. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8666883/ /pubmed/34970640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2021-100576 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Zheng, Yue
Zhang, Haiyin
Fan, Qing
Discordance between family report and clinical assessment of suicide attempts: a prospective study from the emergency department
title Discordance between family report and clinical assessment of suicide attempts: a prospective study from the emergency department
title_full Discordance between family report and clinical assessment of suicide attempts: a prospective study from the emergency department
title_fullStr Discordance between family report and clinical assessment of suicide attempts: a prospective study from the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Discordance between family report and clinical assessment of suicide attempts: a prospective study from the emergency department
title_short Discordance between family report and clinical assessment of suicide attempts: a prospective study from the emergency department
title_sort discordance between family report and clinical assessment of suicide attempts: a prospective study from the emergency department
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34970640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2021-100576
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengyue discordancebetweenfamilyreportandclinicalassessmentofsuicideattemptsaprospectivestudyfromtheemergencydepartment
AT zhanghaiyin discordancebetweenfamilyreportandclinicalassessmentofsuicideattemptsaprospectivestudyfromtheemergencydepartment
AT fanqing discordancebetweenfamilyreportandclinicalassessmentofsuicideattemptsaprospectivestudyfromtheemergencydepartment