Cargando…

Test–retest reliability of outcome measures: data from three trials in radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVES: Aim of this study was to assess test–retest reliability of candidate instruments for the mandatory domains of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS)-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology core set for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: Screening and baseline da...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boel, Anne, Navarro-Compán, Victoria, van der Heijde, Désirée
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34893536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001839
_version_ 1784614288891052032
author Boel, Anne
Navarro-Compán, Victoria
van der Heijde, Désirée
author_facet Boel, Anne
Navarro-Compán, Victoria
van der Heijde, Désirée
author_sort Boel, Anne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Aim of this study was to assess test–retest reliability of candidate instruments for the mandatory domains of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS)-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology core set for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: Screening and baseline data from COAST-V, COAST-X and RAPID-axSpA was used to evaluate test–retest reliability of each candidate instrument for the mandatory domains (disease activity, pain, morning stiffness, fatigue, physical function, overall functioning and health). A maximum time interval of 28 days between both visits was used for inclusion in this study. Test–retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland and Altman plots provided mean difference and 95% limits of agreement, which were used to calculate the smallest detectable change (SDC). Data were analysed for radiographic and non-radiographic axSpA separately. RESULTS: Good reliability was found for Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ICC 0.79, SDC 0.6), C reactive protein (ICC 0.72–0.79, SDC 12.3–17.0), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (ICC 0.87, SDC 1.1) and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (ICC Physical Component Summary 0.81, SDC 4.7, Mental Component Summary 0.80, SDC 7.3). Moderate reliability was found for Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (ICC 0.72, SDC 1.1), patient global assessment (ICC 0.58, SDC 1.5), total back pain (ICC 0.64, SDC 1.3), back pain at night (ICC 0.67, SDC 1.3), morning stiffness (ICC 0.52–0.63, SDC 1.5–2.2), fatigue (ICC 0.65, SDC 1.3) and ASAS-Health Index (ICC 0.74, SDC 2.5). Reliability and SDC for the radiographic and non-radiographic axSpA subgroups were similar. CONCLUSION: Overall reliability was good, and comparable levels of reliability were found for patients with radiographic and non-radiographic axSpA, even though most instruments were developed for radiographic axSpA. Composite measures showed higher reliability than single-item measures in assessing disease activity in patients with axSpA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8666887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86668872021-12-28 Test–retest reliability of outcome measures: data from three trials in radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis Boel, Anne Navarro-Compán, Victoria van der Heijde, Désirée RMD Open Spondyloarthritis OBJECTIVES: Aim of this study was to assess test–retest reliability of candidate instruments for the mandatory domains of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS)-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology core set for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: Screening and baseline data from COAST-V, COAST-X and RAPID-axSpA was used to evaluate test–retest reliability of each candidate instrument for the mandatory domains (disease activity, pain, morning stiffness, fatigue, physical function, overall functioning and health). A maximum time interval of 28 days between both visits was used for inclusion in this study. Test–retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland and Altman plots provided mean difference and 95% limits of agreement, which were used to calculate the smallest detectable change (SDC). Data were analysed for radiographic and non-radiographic axSpA separately. RESULTS: Good reliability was found for Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ICC 0.79, SDC 0.6), C reactive protein (ICC 0.72–0.79, SDC 12.3–17.0), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (ICC 0.87, SDC 1.1) and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (ICC Physical Component Summary 0.81, SDC 4.7, Mental Component Summary 0.80, SDC 7.3). Moderate reliability was found for Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (ICC 0.72, SDC 1.1), patient global assessment (ICC 0.58, SDC 1.5), total back pain (ICC 0.64, SDC 1.3), back pain at night (ICC 0.67, SDC 1.3), morning stiffness (ICC 0.52–0.63, SDC 1.5–2.2), fatigue (ICC 0.65, SDC 1.3) and ASAS-Health Index (ICC 0.74, SDC 2.5). Reliability and SDC for the radiographic and non-radiographic axSpA subgroups were similar. CONCLUSION: Overall reliability was good, and comparable levels of reliability were found for patients with radiographic and non-radiographic axSpA, even though most instruments were developed for radiographic axSpA. Composite measures showed higher reliability than single-item measures in assessing disease activity in patients with axSpA. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8666887/ /pubmed/34893536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001839 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Spondyloarthritis
Boel, Anne
Navarro-Compán, Victoria
van der Heijde, Désirée
Test–retest reliability of outcome measures: data from three trials in radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis
title Test–retest reliability of outcome measures: data from three trials in radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis
title_full Test–retest reliability of outcome measures: data from three trials in radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis
title_fullStr Test–retest reliability of outcome measures: data from three trials in radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis
title_full_unstemmed Test–retest reliability of outcome measures: data from three trials in radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis
title_short Test–retest reliability of outcome measures: data from three trials in radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis
title_sort test–retest reliability of outcome measures: data from three trials in radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis
topic Spondyloarthritis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34893536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001839
work_keys_str_mv AT boelanne testretestreliabilityofoutcomemeasuresdatafromthreetrialsinradiographicandnonradiographicaxialspondyloarthritis
AT navarrocompanvictoria testretestreliabilityofoutcomemeasuresdatafromthreetrialsinradiographicandnonradiographicaxialspondyloarthritis
AT vanderheijdedesiree testretestreliabilityofoutcomemeasuresdatafromthreetrialsinradiographicandnonradiographicaxialspondyloarthritis