Cargando…
Paradox of diversity in the collective brain
Human societies are collective brains. People within every society have cultural brains—brains that have evolved to selectively seek out adaptive knowledge and socially transmit solutions. Innovations emerge at a population level through the transmission of serendipitous mistakes, incremental improv...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34894736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0316 |
_version_ | 1784614294632005632 |
---|---|
author | Schimmelpfennig, Robin Razek, Layla Schnell, Eric Muthukrishna, Michael |
author_facet | Schimmelpfennig, Robin Razek, Layla Schnell, Eric Muthukrishna, Michael |
author_sort | Schimmelpfennig, Robin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Human societies are collective brains. People within every society have cultural brains—brains that have evolved to selectively seek out adaptive knowledge and socially transmit solutions. Innovations emerge at a population level through the transmission of serendipitous mistakes, incremental improvements and novel recombinations. The rate of innovation through these mechanisms is a function of (1) a society's size and interconnectedness (sociality), which affects the number of models available for learning; (2) fidelity of information transmission, which affects how much information is lost during social learning; and (3) cultural trait diversity, which affects the range of possible solutions available for recombination. In general, and perhaps surprisingly, all three levers can increase and harm innovation by creating challenges around coordination, conformity and communication. Here, we focus on the ‘paradox of diversity’—that cultural trait diversity offers the largest potential for empowering innovation, but also poses difficult challenges at both an organizational and societal level. We introduce ‘cultural evolvability’ as a framework for tackling these challenges, with implications for entrepreneurship, polarization and a nuanced understanding of the effects of diversity. This framework can guide researchers and practitioners in how to reap the benefits of diversity by reducing costs. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘The emergence of collective knowledge and cumulative culture in animals, humans and machines’. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8666911 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86669112022-01-03 Paradox of diversity in the collective brain Schimmelpfennig, Robin Razek, Layla Schnell, Eric Muthukrishna, Michael Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles Human societies are collective brains. People within every society have cultural brains—brains that have evolved to selectively seek out adaptive knowledge and socially transmit solutions. Innovations emerge at a population level through the transmission of serendipitous mistakes, incremental improvements and novel recombinations. The rate of innovation through these mechanisms is a function of (1) a society's size and interconnectedness (sociality), which affects the number of models available for learning; (2) fidelity of information transmission, which affects how much information is lost during social learning; and (3) cultural trait diversity, which affects the range of possible solutions available for recombination. In general, and perhaps surprisingly, all three levers can increase and harm innovation by creating challenges around coordination, conformity and communication. Here, we focus on the ‘paradox of diversity’—that cultural trait diversity offers the largest potential for empowering innovation, but also poses difficult challenges at both an organizational and societal level. We introduce ‘cultural evolvability’ as a framework for tackling these challenges, with implications for entrepreneurship, polarization and a nuanced understanding of the effects of diversity. This framework can guide researchers and practitioners in how to reap the benefits of diversity by reducing costs. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘The emergence of collective knowledge and cumulative culture in animals, humans and machines’. The Royal Society 2022-01-31 2021-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8666911/ /pubmed/34894736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0316 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Schimmelpfennig, Robin Razek, Layla Schnell, Eric Muthukrishna, Michael Paradox of diversity in the collective brain |
title | Paradox of diversity in the collective brain |
title_full | Paradox of diversity in the collective brain |
title_fullStr | Paradox of diversity in the collective brain |
title_full_unstemmed | Paradox of diversity in the collective brain |
title_short | Paradox of diversity in the collective brain |
title_sort | paradox of diversity in the collective brain |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666911/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34894736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0316 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schimmelpfennigrobin paradoxofdiversityinthecollectivebrain AT razeklayla paradoxofdiversityinthecollectivebrain AT schnelleric paradoxofdiversityinthecollectivebrain AT muthukrishnamichael paradoxofdiversityinthecollectivebrain |