Cargando…

Assessment of genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2019‐164)

Maize NK603 × T25 × DAS‐40278‐9 (three‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine three single events: NK603, T25 and DAS‐40278‐9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the three single maize events and two of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mullins, Ewen, Bresson, Jean‐Louis, Dalmay, Tamas, Dewhurst, Ian Crawford, Epstein, Michelle M, Firbank, Leslie George, Guerche, Philippe, Hejatko, Jan, Naegeli, Hanspeter, Moreno, Francisco Javier, Nogué, Fabien, Rostoks, Nils, Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan, Savoini, Giovanni, Veromann, Eve, Veronesi, Fabio, Ardizzone, Michele, De Sanctis, Giacomo, Fernandez Dumont, Antonio, Federici, Silvia, Gennaro, Andrea, Gomez Ruiz, Jose Angel, Kagkli, Dafni Maria, Lanzoni, Anna, Neri, Franco Maria, Papadopoulou, Nikoletta, Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos, Raffaello, Tommaso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938370
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6942
_version_ 1784614300386590720
author Mullins, Ewen
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Ardizzone, Michele
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
Federici, Silvia
Gennaro, Andrea
Gomez Ruiz, Jose Angel
Kagkli, Dafni Maria
Lanzoni, Anna
Neri, Franco Maria
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Raffaello, Tommaso
author_facet Mullins, Ewen
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Ardizzone, Michele
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
Federici, Silvia
Gennaro, Andrea
Gomez Ruiz, Jose Angel
Kagkli, Dafni Maria
Lanzoni, Anna
Neri, Franco Maria
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Raffaello, Tommaso
collection PubMed
description Maize NK603 × T25 × DAS‐40278‐9 (three‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine three single events: NK603, T25 and DAS‐40278‐9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the three single maize events and two of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the two subcombinations were identified that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the three‐event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the three‐event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as the non‐GM comparator and the selected non‐GM reference varieties. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the three‐event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in one of the maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the three‐event stack maize. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the three‐event stack maize. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the three‐event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as the non‐GM comparator and the selected non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8666937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86669372021-12-21 Assessment of genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2019‐164) Mullins, Ewen Bresson, Jean‐Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Naegeli, Hanspeter Moreno, Francisco Javier Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Ardizzone, Michele De Sanctis, Giacomo Fernandez Dumont, Antonio Federici, Silvia Gennaro, Andrea Gomez Ruiz, Jose Angel Kagkli, Dafni Maria Lanzoni, Anna Neri, Franco Maria Papadopoulou, Nikoletta Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos Raffaello, Tommaso EFSA J Scientific Opinion Maize NK603 × T25 × DAS‐40278‐9 (three‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine three single events: NK603, T25 and DAS‐40278‐9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the three single maize events and two of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the two subcombinations were identified that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the three‐event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the three‐event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as the non‐GM comparator and the selected non‐GM reference varieties. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the three‐event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in one of the maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the three‐event stack maize. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the three‐event stack maize. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the three‐event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as the non‐GM comparator and the selected non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8666937/ /pubmed/34938370 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6942 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Mullins, Ewen
Bresson, Jean‐Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Ardizzone, Michele
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
Federici, Silvia
Gennaro, Andrea
Gomez Ruiz, Jose Angel
Kagkli, Dafni Maria
Lanzoni, Anna
Neri, Franco Maria
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Raffaello, Tommaso
Assessment of genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2019‐164)
title Assessment of genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2019‐164)
title_full Assessment of genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2019‐164)
title_fullStr Assessment of genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2019‐164)
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2019‐164)
title_short Assessment of genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 × DAS‐40278‐9 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2019‐164)
title_sort assessment of genetically modified maize nk603 × t25 × das‐40278‐9 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 (application efsa‐gmo‐nl‐2019‐164)
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938370
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6942
work_keys_str_mv AT assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT mullinsewen assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT bressonjeanlouis assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT dalmaytamas assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT dewhurstiancrawford assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT epsteinmichellem assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT firbanklesliegeorge assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT guerchephilippe assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT hejatkojan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT naegelihanspeter assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT morenofranciscojavier assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT noguefabien assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT rostoksnils assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT sanchezserranojosejuan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT savoinigiovanni assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT veromanneve assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT veronesifabio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT ardizzonemichele assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT desanctisgiacomo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT fernandezdumontantonio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT federicisilvia assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT gennaroandrea assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT gomezruizjoseangel assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT kagklidafnimaria assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT lanzonianna assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT nerifrancomaria assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT papadopoulounikoletta assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT paraskevopouloskonstantinos assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164
AT raffaellotommaso assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizenk603t25das402789andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2019164