Cargando…

Impact of Dose Reduction of Afatinib Used in Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Aim: As one of the second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–tyrosine kinase inhibitors, afatinib brings survival benefits to patients with common and rare EGFR mutations. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of 30 and 40 mg of afatinib in patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Ziyu, Du, Xin, Chen, Ken, Li, Shanshan, Yu, Zhiheng, Wu, Ziyang, Yang, Li, Chen, Dingding, Liu, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34912228
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.781084
_version_ 1784614306236596224
author Wang, Ziyu
Du, Xin
Chen, Ken
Li, Shanshan
Yu, Zhiheng
Wu, Ziyang
Yang, Li
Chen, Dingding
Liu, Wei
author_facet Wang, Ziyu
Du, Xin
Chen, Ken
Li, Shanshan
Yu, Zhiheng
Wu, Ziyang
Yang, Li
Chen, Dingding
Liu, Wei
author_sort Wang, Ziyu
collection PubMed
description Background and Aim: As one of the second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–tyrosine kinase inhibitors, afatinib brings survival benefits to patients with common and rare EGFR mutations. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of 30 and 40 mg of afatinib in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using qualitative and quantitative analysis methods so as to provide reference for clinical medication. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang databases were thoroughly searched from inception to February 26, 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the quality. RevMan and Stata 15.0 were used for meta-analysis. Results: Twelve cohort studies including 1290 patients for final analysis were selected; of which, 1129 patients were analyzed to measure the effectiveness outcomes and 470 patients were analyzed for safety outcomes. In patients with non-brain metastasis, the progression-free survival of the first- or second-line treatment with reduced-dose afatinib was equivalent to the conventional dose. In terms of safety, the reduced dose could significantly lower the incidence of severe diarrhea and severe rash, but not the total incidence of diarrhea, rash, and all levels of paronychia. Conclusions: The incidence of common serious adverse reactions was significantly lower with 30 mg of afatinib than with 40 mg of afatinib in patients with NSCLC. The effectiveness appeared to be similar to that in patients with non-brain metastasis. This study provides a reference for clinical dose reduction of afatinib. Systematic Review Registration: [PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42021238043]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8666963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86669632021-12-14 Impact of Dose Reduction of Afatinib Used in Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Wang, Ziyu Du, Xin Chen, Ken Li, Shanshan Yu, Zhiheng Wu, Ziyang Yang, Li Chen, Dingding Liu, Wei Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background and Aim: As one of the second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–tyrosine kinase inhibitors, afatinib brings survival benefits to patients with common and rare EGFR mutations. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of 30 and 40 mg of afatinib in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using qualitative and quantitative analysis methods so as to provide reference for clinical medication. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang databases were thoroughly searched from inception to February 26, 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the quality. RevMan and Stata 15.0 were used for meta-analysis. Results: Twelve cohort studies including 1290 patients for final analysis were selected; of which, 1129 patients were analyzed to measure the effectiveness outcomes and 470 patients were analyzed for safety outcomes. In patients with non-brain metastasis, the progression-free survival of the first- or second-line treatment with reduced-dose afatinib was equivalent to the conventional dose. In terms of safety, the reduced dose could significantly lower the incidence of severe diarrhea and severe rash, but not the total incidence of diarrhea, rash, and all levels of paronychia. Conclusions: The incidence of common serious adverse reactions was significantly lower with 30 mg of afatinib than with 40 mg of afatinib in patients with NSCLC. The effectiveness appeared to be similar to that in patients with non-brain metastasis. This study provides a reference for clinical dose reduction of afatinib. Systematic Review Registration: [PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42021238043] Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8666963/ /pubmed/34912228 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.781084 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wang, Du, Chen, Li, Yu, Wu, Yang, Chen and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Wang, Ziyu
Du, Xin
Chen, Ken
Li, Shanshan
Yu, Zhiheng
Wu, Ziyang
Yang, Li
Chen, Dingding
Liu, Wei
Impact of Dose Reduction of Afatinib Used in Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Impact of Dose Reduction of Afatinib Used in Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Impact of Dose Reduction of Afatinib Used in Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Impact of Dose Reduction of Afatinib Used in Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Dose Reduction of Afatinib Used in Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Impact of Dose Reduction of Afatinib Used in Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort impact of dose reduction of afatinib used in patients with non–small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8666963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34912228
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.781084
work_keys_str_mv AT wangziyu impactofdosereductionofafatinibusedinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT duxin impactofdosereductionofafatinibusedinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenken impactofdosereductionofafatinibusedinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lishanshan impactofdosereductionofafatinibusedinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuzhiheng impactofdosereductionofafatinibusedinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuziyang impactofdosereductionofafatinibusedinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangli impactofdosereductionofafatinibusedinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chendingding impactofdosereductionofafatinibusedinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuwei impactofdosereductionofafatinibusedinpatientswithnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis