Cargando…

Early-cleavage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer: a prospective comparative study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether or not embryo transfer (ET) day has an effect on the rates of clinical pregnancy (CPR) and live birth (LBR) in in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 757 patients who underwent IVF-ICSI treatment b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: İnal, Hasan Ali, Öztürk İnal, Zeynep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8667005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663200
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2021.2020.0171
_version_ 1784614313121546240
author İnal, Hasan Ali
Öztürk İnal, Zeynep
author_facet İnal, Hasan Ali
Öztürk İnal, Zeynep
author_sort İnal, Hasan Ali
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether or not embryo transfer (ET) day has an effect on the rates of clinical pregnancy (CPR) and live birth (LBR) in in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 757 patients who underwent IVF-ICSI treatment between 2012 and 2017 were included. The participants were stratified into three groups according to ET day: group 1 (day 2 transfer, n=43); group 2 (day 3 transfer, n=633); and group 3 [day 5 (blastocyst) transfer, n=81]. Basal parameters and IVF-ICSI outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Group 1 and 2 patients were older, had a higher body mass index, worse response rate, lower antral follicle count, lower peak estradiol levels, and less endometrial thickness, and required higher total gonadotropin dose than group 3. In addition, the number of oocytes and metaphase II oocytes, fertilization rate, and 2 pronucleus number were statistically different between the groups. The CPR (19.5% vs 36.9% vs 39.0%, respectively) and LBR (14.6% vs 30.4% vs 35.1%, respectively) were significantly lower in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3 (p<0.05). Grade 1 embryos were significantly more prevalent in groups 1 and 2 with clinical pregnancy positive [odds ratio (OR): 4.444; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.876-22.536; p=0.001 and OR: 1.756; 95% CI: 1.234-2.500; p<0.001) and live birth (OR: 5.021; 95% CI: 0.787-31.768; p=0.001 and OR: 1.676; 95% CI: 1.154-2.433; p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that an earlier ET day has a negative effect on the CPR. Older primary infertile women should not postpone their desire to have a baby because they appear to be poorer responders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8667005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86670052021-12-16 Early-cleavage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer: a prospective comparative study İnal, Hasan Ali Öztürk İnal, Zeynep J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc Original Investigation OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether or not embryo transfer (ET) day has an effect on the rates of clinical pregnancy (CPR) and live birth (LBR) in in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 757 patients who underwent IVF-ICSI treatment between 2012 and 2017 were included. The participants were stratified into three groups according to ET day: group 1 (day 2 transfer, n=43); group 2 (day 3 transfer, n=633); and group 3 [day 5 (blastocyst) transfer, n=81]. Basal parameters and IVF-ICSI outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Group 1 and 2 patients were older, had a higher body mass index, worse response rate, lower antral follicle count, lower peak estradiol levels, and less endometrial thickness, and required higher total gonadotropin dose than group 3. In addition, the number of oocytes and metaphase II oocytes, fertilization rate, and 2 pronucleus number were statistically different between the groups. The CPR (19.5% vs 36.9% vs 39.0%, respectively) and LBR (14.6% vs 30.4% vs 35.1%, respectively) were significantly lower in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3 (p<0.05). Grade 1 embryos were significantly more prevalent in groups 1 and 2 with clinical pregnancy positive [odds ratio (OR): 4.444; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.876-22.536; p=0.001 and OR: 1.756; 95% CI: 1.234-2.500; p<0.001) and live birth (OR: 5.021; 95% CI: 0.787-31.768; p=0.001 and OR: 1.676; 95% CI: 1.154-2.433; p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that an earlier ET day has a negative effect on the CPR. Older primary infertile women should not postpone their desire to have a baby because they appear to be poorer responders. Galenos Publishing 2021-12 2021-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8667005/ /pubmed/33663200 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2021.2020.0171 Text en © Copyright 2021 by the Turkish-German Gynecological Education and Research Foundation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association published by Galenos Publishing House.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
İnal, Hasan Ali
Öztürk İnal, Zeynep
Early-cleavage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer: a prospective comparative study
title Early-cleavage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer: a prospective comparative study
title_full Early-cleavage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer: a prospective comparative study
title_fullStr Early-cleavage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer: a prospective comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Early-cleavage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer: a prospective comparative study
title_short Early-cleavage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer: a prospective comparative study
title_sort early-cleavage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer: a prospective comparative study
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8667005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33663200
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2021.2020.0171
work_keys_str_mv AT inalhasanali earlycleavageversusblastocyststageembryotransferaprospectivecomparativestudy
AT ozturkinalzeynep earlycleavageversusblastocyststageembryotransferaprospectivecomparativestudy