Cargando…
Development of a novel miR-3648-related gene signature as a prognostic biomarker in esophageal adenocarcinoma
BACKGROUND: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) is a typical immunogenic malignant tumor with a dismal 5-year survival rate lower than 20%. Although miRNA-3648 (miR-3648) is expressed abnormally in EA, its impact on the tumor immune microenvironment remains unknown. In this study, we sought to identify i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8667142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988211 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6237 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) is a typical immunogenic malignant tumor with a dismal 5-year survival rate lower than 20%. Although miRNA-3648 (miR-3648) is expressed abnormally in EA, its impact on the tumor immune microenvironment remains unknown. In this study, we sought to identify immune-related genes (IRGs) that are targeted by miR-3648 and develop an EA multigene signature. METHODS: The gene expression data of 87 EA tumor samples and 67 normal tissue samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) database were downloaded, respectively. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), the CIBERSORT algorithm, and Cox regression analysis were applied to identify IRGs and to construct a prognostic signature and nomogram. RESULTS: MiR-3648 was expectedly highly expressed in EA tumor tissues (P=2.6e-8), and related to the infiltration of activated natural killer cells (NK cells) and activated CD4 T lymphocytes (CD4 cells). A total of 70 miR-3648-targeted genes related to immune cell infiltration were identified. Among them, 4 genes (C10orf55, DLL4, PANX2, and NKAIN1) were closely related to overall survival (OS), and were thus selected to construct a 4-gene risk score (RS). The RS had a superior capability to predict OS [area under the curve (AUC) =0.740 for 1 year; AUC =0.717 for 3 years; AUC =0.622 for 5 years]. A higher score was indicative of a poorer prognosis than a lower score [hazard ratio (HR) =2.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.45–5.09; P=0.002]. Furthermore, the nomogram formed by combining the RS and the TNM classification of malignant tumors (TNM stage) improved the accuracy of survival prediction [Harrell’s concordance index (C-index) =0.698]. CONCLUSIONS: MiR-3648 may play a critical role in EA pathogenesis. The novel 4-gene signature may serve as a prognostic tool to manage patients with EA. |
---|