Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of a New Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Filler in the Correction of Moderate-to-Severe Dynamic Perioral Rhytides: A 52-Week Prospective, Multicenter, Controlled, Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded Study

The perioral region is highly mobile and subject to multifactorial changes during aging. Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Redensity (RHA(R)), an RHA filler, was developed with the aim of optimizing outcomes in dynamic facial areas. OBJECTIVE: This randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical study aimed to de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sundaram, Hema, Shamban, Ava, Schlessinger, Joel, Kaufman-Janette, Joely, Joseph, John H., Lupin, Mark, Draelos, Zoe, Carey, Wayne, Smith, Stacy, Eaton, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8667798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34608092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000003238
Descripción
Sumario:The perioral region is highly mobile and subject to multifactorial changes during aging. Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Redensity (RHA(R)), an RHA filler, was developed with the aim of optimizing outcomes in dynamic facial areas. OBJECTIVE: This randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical study aimed to demonstrate superiority of RHA(R) over no-treatment control for correction of moderate-to-severe dynamic perioral rhytides. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blinded live evaluator assessments of efficacy included improvement in perioral rhytides severity using a proprietary scale (Perioral Rhytids Severity Rating Scale [PR-SRS]) and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. Subjects self-assessed their results with FACE-Q, a validated patient-reported outcome measure, and satisfaction scales. Safety was monitored throughout the study based on common treatment responses (CTRs) and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: The primary efficacy end point was achieved, with the treatment group showing statistically significant superiority over the control group at Week 8 (80.7% vs 7.8% responder rate by PR-SRS, p < .0001). Most patients (66%) were still responders at Week 52 (study completion). Most AEs were CTRs after perioral injection of a dermal filler, and none was a clinically significant treatment-related AE. CONCLUSION: Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Redensity is effective and safe for the correction of dynamic perioral rhytides in all Fitzpatrick phototypes, with marked durability.