Cargando…
Brain Activity Reflects Subjective Response to Delayed Input When Using an Electromyography-Controlled Robot
In various experimental settings, electromyography (EMG) signals have been used to control robots. EMG-based robot control requires intrinsic parameters for control, which makes it difficult for users to understand the input protocol. When a proper input is not provided, the response time of the sys...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8667890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34912195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2021.767477 |
_version_ | 1784614452914552832 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Hyeonseok Kim, Yeongdae Miyakoshi, Makoto Stapornchaisit, Sorawit Yoshimura, Natsue Koike, Yasuharu |
author_facet | Kim, Hyeonseok Kim, Yeongdae Miyakoshi, Makoto Stapornchaisit, Sorawit Yoshimura, Natsue Koike, Yasuharu |
author_sort | Kim, Hyeonseok |
collection | PubMed |
description | In various experimental settings, electromyography (EMG) signals have been used to control robots. EMG-based robot control requires intrinsic parameters for control, which makes it difficult for users to understand the input protocol. When a proper input is not provided, the response time of the system varies; as such, the user’s subjective delay should be investigated regardless of the actual delay. In this study, we investigated the influence of the subjective perception of delay on brain activation. Brain recordings were taken while subjects used EMG signals to control a robot hand, which requires a basic processing delay. We used muscle synergy for the grip command of the robot hand. After controlling the robot by grasping their hand, one of four additional delay durations (0 ms, 50 ms, 125 ms, and 250 ms) was applied in every trial, and subjects were instructed to answer whether the delay was natural, additional, or whether they were not sure. We compared brain activity based on responses (“sure” and “not sure”). Our results revealed a significant power difference in the theta band of the parietal lobe, and this time range included the interval in which the subjects could not feel the delay. Our study provides important insights that should be considered when constructing an adaptive system and evaluating its usability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8667890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86678902021-12-14 Brain Activity Reflects Subjective Response to Delayed Input When Using an Electromyography-Controlled Robot Kim, Hyeonseok Kim, Yeongdae Miyakoshi, Makoto Stapornchaisit, Sorawit Yoshimura, Natsue Koike, Yasuharu Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience In various experimental settings, electromyography (EMG) signals have been used to control robots. EMG-based robot control requires intrinsic parameters for control, which makes it difficult for users to understand the input protocol. When a proper input is not provided, the response time of the system varies; as such, the user’s subjective delay should be investigated regardless of the actual delay. In this study, we investigated the influence of the subjective perception of delay on brain activation. Brain recordings were taken while subjects used EMG signals to control a robot hand, which requires a basic processing delay. We used muscle synergy for the grip command of the robot hand. After controlling the robot by grasping their hand, one of four additional delay durations (0 ms, 50 ms, 125 ms, and 250 ms) was applied in every trial, and subjects were instructed to answer whether the delay was natural, additional, or whether they were not sure. We compared brain activity based on responses (“sure” and “not sure”). Our results revealed a significant power difference in the theta band of the parietal lobe, and this time range included the interval in which the subjects could not feel the delay. Our study provides important insights that should be considered when constructing an adaptive system and evaluating its usability. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8667890/ /pubmed/34912195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2021.767477 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kim, Kim, Miyakoshi, Stapornchaisit, Yoshimura and Koike. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Kim, Hyeonseok Kim, Yeongdae Miyakoshi, Makoto Stapornchaisit, Sorawit Yoshimura, Natsue Koike, Yasuharu Brain Activity Reflects Subjective Response to Delayed Input When Using an Electromyography-Controlled Robot |
title | Brain Activity Reflects Subjective Response to Delayed Input When Using an Electromyography-Controlled Robot |
title_full | Brain Activity Reflects Subjective Response to Delayed Input When Using an Electromyography-Controlled Robot |
title_fullStr | Brain Activity Reflects Subjective Response to Delayed Input When Using an Electromyography-Controlled Robot |
title_full_unstemmed | Brain Activity Reflects Subjective Response to Delayed Input When Using an Electromyography-Controlled Robot |
title_short | Brain Activity Reflects Subjective Response to Delayed Input When Using an Electromyography-Controlled Robot |
title_sort | brain activity reflects subjective response to delayed input when using an electromyography-controlled robot |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8667890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34912195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2021.767477 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimhyeonseok brainactivityreflectssubjectiveresponsetodelayedinputwhenusinganelectromyographycontrolledrobot AT kimyeongdae brainactivityreflectssubjectiveresponsetodelayedinputwhenusinganelectromyographycontrolledrobot AT miyakoshimakoto brainactivityreflectssubjectiveresponsetodelayedinputwhenusinganelectromyographycontrolledrobot AT stapornchaisitsorawit brainactivityreflectssubjectiveresponsetodelayedinputwhenusinganelectromyographycontrolledrobot AT yoshimuranatsue brainactivityreflectssubjectiveresponsetodelayedinputwhenusinganelectromyographycontrolledrobot AT koikeyasuharu brainactivityreflectssubjectiveresponsetodelayedinputwhenusinganelectromyographycontrolledrobot |