Cargando…

Brain Activity Reflects Subjective Response to Delayed Input When Using an Electromyography-Controlled Robot

In various experimental settings, electromyography (EMG) signals have been used to control robots. EMG-based robot control requires intrinsic parameters for control, which makes it difficult for users to understand the input protocol. When a proper input is not provided, the response time of the sys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyeonseok, Kim, Yeongdae, Miyakoshi, Makoto, Stapornchaisit, Sorawit, Yoshimura, Natsue, Koike, Yasuharu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8667890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34912195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2021.767477
_version_ 1784614452914552832
author Kim, Hyeonseok
Kim, Yeongdae
Miyakoshi, Makoto
Stapornchaisit, Sorawit
Yoshimura, Natsue
Koike, Yasuharu
author_facet Kim, Hyeonseok
Kim, Yeongdae
Miyakoshi, Makoto
Stapornchaisit, Sorawit
Yoshimura, Natsue
Koike, Yasuharu
author_sort Kim, Hyeonseok
collection PubMed
description In various experimental settings, electromyography (EMG) signals have been used to control robots. EMG-based robot control requires intrinsic parameters for control, which makes it difficult for users to understand the input protocol. When a proper input is not provided, the response time of the system varies; as such, the user’s subjective delay should be investigated regardless of the actual delay. In this study, we investigated the influence of the subjective perception of delay on brain activation. Brain recordings were taken while subjects used EMG signals to control a robot hand, which requires a basic processing delay. We used muscle synergy for the grip command of the robot hand. After controlling the robot by grasping their hand, one of four additional delay durations (0 ms, 50 ms, 125 ms, and 250 ms) was applied in every trial, and subjects were instructed to answer whether the delay was natural, additional, or whether they were not sure. We compared brain activity based on responses (“sure” and “not sure”). Our results revealed a significant power difference in the theta band of the parietal lobe, and this time range included the interval in which the subjects could not feel the delay. Our study provides important insights that should be considered when constructing an adaptive system and evaluating its usability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8667890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86678902021-12-14 Brain Activity Reflects Subjective Response to Delayed Input When Using an Electromyography-Controlled Robot Kim, Hyeonseok Kim, Yeongdae Miyakoshi, Makoto Stapornchaisit, Sorawit Yoshimura, Natsue Koike, Yasuharu Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience In various experimental settings, electromyography (EMG) signals have been used to control robots. EMG-based robot control requires intrinsic parameters for control, which makes it difficult for users to understand the input protocol. When a proper input is not provided, the response time of the system varies; as such, the user’s subjective delay should be investigated regardless of the actual delay. In this study, we investigated the influence of the subjective perception of delay on brain activation. Brain recordings were taken while subjects used EMG signals to control a robot hand, which requires a basic processing delay. We used muscle synergy for the grip command of the robot hand. After controlling the robot by grasping their hand, one of four additional delay durations (0 ms, 50 ms, 125 ms, and 250 ms) was applied in every trial, and subjects were instructed to answer whether the delay was natural, additional, or whether they were not sure. We compared brain activity based on responses (“sure” and “not sure”). Our results revealed a significant power difference in the theta band of the parietal lobe, and this time range included the interval in which the subjects could not feel the delay. Our study provides important insights that should be considered when constructing an adaptive system and evaluating its usability. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8667890/ /pubmed/34912195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2021.767477 Text en Copyright © 2021 Kim, Kim, Miyakoshi, Stapornchaisit, Yoshimura and Koike. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Kim, Hyeonseok
Kim, Yeongdae
Miyakoshi, Makoto
Stapornchaisit, Sorawit
Yoshimura, Natsue
Koike, Yasuharu
Brain Activity Reflects Subjective Response to Delayed Input When Using an Electromyography-Controlled Robot
title Brain Activity Reflects Subjective Response to Delayed Input When Using an Electromyography-Controlled Robot
title_full Brain Activity Reflects Subjective Response to Delayed Input When Using an Electromyography-Controlled Robot
title_fullStr Brain Activity Reflects Subjective Response to Delayed Input When Using an Electromyography-Controlled Robot
title_full_unstemmed Brain Activity Reflects Subjective Response to Delayed Input When Using an Electromyography-Controlled Robot
title_short Brain Activity Reflects Subjective Response to Delayed Input When Using an Electromyography-Controlled Robot
title_sort brain activity reflects subjective response to delayed input when using an electromyography-controlled robot
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8667890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34912195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2021.767477
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyeonseok brainactivityreflectssubjectiveresponsetodelayedinputwhenusinganelectromyographycontrolledrobot
AT kimyeongdae brainactivityreflectssubjectiveresponsetodelayedinputwhenusinganelectromyographycontrolledrobot
AT miyakoshimakoto brainactivityreflectssubjectiveresponsetodelayedinputwhenusinganelectromyographycontrolledrobot
AT stapornchaisitsorawit brainactivityreflectssubjectiveresponsetodelayedinputwhenusinganelectromyographycontrolledrobot
AT yoshimuranatsue brainactivityreflectssubjectiveresponsetodelayedinputwhenusinganelectromyographycontrolledrobot
AT koikeyasuharu brainactivityreflectssubjectiveresponsetodelayedinputwhenusinganelectromyographycontrolledrobot