Cargando…

Complex PTSD: what is the clinical utility of the diagnosis?

Background: The diagnosis of complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) was included in the 11th revised edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). CPTSD shares trauma-specific symptoms with its sibling disorder PTSD but is additionally characterized by disturbances of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nestgaard Rød, Åshild, Schmidt, Casper
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8667899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34912502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.2002028
_version_ 1784614455081959424
author Nestgaard Rød, Åshild
Schmidt, Casper
author_facet Nestgaard Rød, Åshild
Schmidt, Casper
author_sort Nestgaard Rød, Åshild
collection PubMed
description Background: The diagnosis of complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) was included in the 11th revised edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). CPTSD shares trauma-specific symptoms with its sibling disorder PTSD but is additionally characterized by disturbances of the individual’s self-organization (DSO). The clinical utility of the CPTSD diagnosis has yet to be thoroughly investigated. Objective: The current study aimed to examine the clinical utility of the CPTSD diagnosis, considering the upcoming implementation of ICD-11 in clinical practice. Method: International field studies, construct- and validity analyses leading up to the inclusion in ICD-11 are reviewed, and the diagnostic measures; International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) and International Trauma Interview (ITI) are presented. Also, the relationship between CPTSD and borderline personality disorder (BPD) is elaborated in an independent analysis, to clarify their differences in clinical relevance to treatment. Treatment implications for CPTSD are discussed with reference to existing guidelines and clinical needs. Results: The validation of ITQ and ITI contributes to the cementation of CPTSD in further clinical practice, providing qualified assessment of the construct, with intended informative value for both clinical communication and facilitation of treatment. CPTSD is found distinguishable from both PTSD and BPD in empirical studies, while the possibility of comorbid BPD/PTSD cases being better described as CPTSD is acknowledged. Practitioners need to employ well-established methods developed for PTSD, while considering additional DSO-symptoms in treatment of CPTSD. Conclusions: The inclusion of CPTSD in ICD-11 may potentially facilitate access to more tailored treatment interventions, as well as contribute to increased research focus on disorders specifically associated with stress. The clinical utility value of this additional diagnosis is expected to reveal itself further after ICD-11 is implemented in clinical practice in 2022 and onwards. Yet, CPTSD’s diagnostic inclusion gives future optimism to assessing and treating complex posttraumatic stress symptoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8667899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86678992021-12-14 Complex PTSD: what is the clinical utility of the diagnosis? Nestgaard Rød, Åshild Schmidt, Casper Eur J Psychotraumatol Review Article Background: The diagnosis of complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) was included in the 11th revised edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). CPTSD shares trauma-specific symptoms with its sibling disorder PTSD but is additionally characterized by disturbances of the individual’s self-organization (DSO). The clinical utility of the CPTSD diagnosis has yet to be thoroughly investigated. Objective: The current study aimed to examine the clinical utility of the CPTSD diagnosis, considering the upcoming implementation of ICD-11 in clinical practice. Method: International field studies, construct- and validity analyses leading up to the inclusion in ICD-11 are reviewed, and the diagnostic measures; International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) and International Trauma Interview (ITI) are presented. Also, the relationship between CPTSD and borderline personality disorder (BPD) is elaborated in an independent analysis, to clarify their differences in clinical relevance to treatment. Treatment implications for CPTSD are discussed with reference to existing guidelines and clinical needs. Results: The validation of ITQ and ITI contributes to the cementation of CPTSD in further clinical practice, providing qualified assessment of the construct, with intended informative value for both clinical communication and facilitation of treatment. CPTSD is found distinguishable from both PTSD and BPD in empirical studies, while the possibility of comorbid BPD/PTSD cases being better described as CPTSD is acknowledged. Practitioners need to employ well-established methods developed for PTSD, while considering additional DSO-symptoms in treatment of CPTSD. Conclusions: The inclusion of CPTSD in ICD-11 may potentially facilitate access to more tailored treatment interventions, as well as contribute to increased research focus on disorders specifically associated with stress. The clinical utility value of this additional diagnosis is expected to reveal itself further after ICD-11 is implemented in clinical practice in 2022 and onwards. Yet, CPTSD’s diagnostic inclusion gives future optimism to assessing and treating complex posttraumatic stress symptoms. Taylor & Francis 2021-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8667899/ /pubmed/34912502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.2002028 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Nestgaard Rød, Åshild
Schmidt, Casper
Complex PTSD: what is the clinical utility of the diagnosis?
title Complex PTSD: what is the clinical utility of the diagnosis?
title_full Complex PTSD: what is the clinical utility of the diagnosis?
title_fullStr Complex PTSD: what is the clinical utility of the diagnosis?
title_full_unstemmed Complex PTSD: what is the clinical utility of the diagnosis?
title_short Complex PTSD: what is the clinical utility of the diagnosis?
title_sort complex ptsd: what is the clinical utility of the diagnosis?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8667899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34912502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.2002028
work_keys_str_mv AT nestgaardrødashild complexptsdwhatistheclinicalutilityofthediagnosis
AT schmidtcasper complexptsdwhatistheclinicalutilityofthediagnosis