Cargando…
An Alternative to the Light Touch Digital Health Remote Study: The Stress and Recovery in Frontline COVID-19 Health Care Workers Study
BACKGROUND: Several app-based studies share similar characteristics of a light touch approach that recruit, enroll, and onboard via a smartphone app and attempt to minimize burden through low-friction active study tasks while emphasizing the collection of passive data with minimal human contact. How...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8668021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34726607 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32165 |
_version_ | 1784614482959400960 |
---|---|
author | Goodday, Sarah M Karlin, Emma Alfarano, Alexandria Brooks, Alexa Chapman, Carol Desille, Rachelle Rangwala, Shazia Karlin, Daniel R Emami, Hoora Woods, Nancy Fugate Boch, Adrien Foschini, Luca Wildman, Mackenzie Cormack, Francesca Taptiklis, Nick Pratap, Abhishek Ghassemi, Marzyeh Goldenberg, Anna Nagaraj, Sujay Walsh, Elaine Friend, Stephen |
author_facet | Goodday, Sarah M Karlin, Emma Alfarano, Alexandria Brooks, Alexa Chapman, Carol Desille, Rachelle Rangwala, Shazia Karlin, Daniel R Emami, Hoora Woods, Nancy Fugate Boch, Adrien Foschini, Luca Wildman, Mackenzie Cormack, Francesca Taptiklis, Nick Pratap, Abhishek Ghassemi, Marzyeh Goldenberg, Anna Nagaraj, Sujay Walsh, Elaine Friend, Stephen |
author_sort | Goodday, Sarah M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several app-based studies share similar characteristics of a light touch approach that recruit, enroll, and onboard via a smartphone app and attempt to minimize burden through low-friction active study tasks while emphasizing the collection of passive data with minimal human contact. However, engagement is a common challenge across these studies, reporting low retention and adherence. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe an alternative to a light touch digital health study that involved a participant-centric design including high friction app-based assessments, semicontinuous passive data from wearable sensors, and a digital engagement strategy centered on providing knowledge and support to participants. METHODS: The Stress and Recovery in Frontline COVID-19 Health Care Workers Study included US frontline health care workers followed between May and November 2020. The study comprised 3 main components: (1) active and passive assessments of stress and symptoms from a smartphone app, (2) objective measured assessments of acute stress from wearable sensors, and (3) a participant codriven engagement strategy that centered on providing knowledge and support to participants. The daily participant time commitment was an average of 10 to 15 minutes. Retention and adherence are described both quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: A total of 365 participants enrolled and started the study, and 81.0% (n=297) of them completed the study for a total study duration of 4 months. Average wearable sensor use was 90.6% days of total study duration. App-based daily, weekly, and every other week surveys were completed on average 69.18%, 68.37%, and 72.86% of the time, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study found evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of a participant-centric digital health study approach that involved building trust with participants and providing support through regular phone check-ins. In addition to high retention and adherence, the collection of large volumes of objective measured data alongside contextual self-reported subjective data was able to be collected, which is often missing from light touch digital health studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04713111; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04713111 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8668021 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86680212022-01-10 An Alternative to the Light Touch Digital Health Remote Study: The Stress and Recovery in Frontline COVID-19 Health Care Workers Study Goodday, Sarah M Karlin, Emma Alfarano, Alexandria Brooks, Alexa Chapman, Carol Desille, Rachelle Rangwala, Shazia Karlin, Daniel R Emami, Hoora Woods, Nancy Fugate Boch, Adrien Foschini, Luca Wildman, Mackenzie Cormack, Francesca Taptiklis, Nick Pratap, Abhishek Ghassemi, Marzyeh Goldenberg, Anna Nagaraj, Sujay Walsh, Elaine Friend, Stephen JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Several app-based studies share similar characteristics of a light touch approach that recruit, enroll, and onboard via a smartphone app and attempt to minimize burden through low-friction active study tasks while emphasizing the collection of passive data with minimal human contact. However, engagement is a common challenge across these studies, reporting low retention and adherence. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe an alternative to a light touch digital health study that involved a participant-centric design including high friction app-based assessments, semicontinuous passive data from wearable sensors, and a digital engagement strategy centered on providing knowledge and support to participants. METHODS: The Stress and Recovery in Frontline COVID-19 Health Care Workers Study included US frontline health care workers followed between May and November 2020. The study comprised 3 main components: (1) active and passive assessments of stress and symptoms from a smartphone app, (2) objective measured assessments of acute stress from wearable sensors, and (3) a participant codriven engagement strategy that centered on providing knowledge and support to participants. The daily participant time commitment was an average of 10 to 15 minutes. Retention and adherence are described both quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: A total of 365 participants enrolled and started the study, and 81.0% (n=297) of them completed the study for a total study duration of 4 months. Average wearable sensor use was 90.6% days of total study duration. App-based daily, weekly, and every other week surveys were completed on average 69.18%, 68.37%, and 72.86% of the time, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study found evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of a participant-centric digital health study approach that involved building trust with participants and providing support through regular phone check-ins. In addition to high retention and adherence, the collection of large volumes of objective measured data alongside contextual self-reported subjective data was able to be collected, which is often missing from light touch digital health studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04713111; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04713111 JMIR Publications 2021-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8668021/ /pubmed/34726607 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32165 Text en ©Sarah M Goodday, Emma Karlin, Alexandria Alfarano, Alexa Brooks, Carol Chapman, Rachelle Desille, Shazia Rangwala, Daniel R Karlin, Hoora Emami, Nancy Fugate Woods, Adrien Boch, Luca Foschini, Mackenzie Wildman, Francesca Cormack, Nick Taptiklis, Abhishek Pratap, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Anna Goldenberg, Sujay Nagaraj, Elaine Walsh, Stress And Recovery Participants, Stephen Friend. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 10.12.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Goodday, Sarah M Karlin, Emma Alfarano, Alexandria Brooks, Alexa Chapman, Carol Desille, Rachelle Rangwala, Shazia Karlin, Daniel R Emami, Hoora Woods, Nancy Fugate Boch, Adrien Foschini, Luca Wildman, Mackenzie Cormack, Francesca Taptiklis, Nick Pratap, Abhishek Ghassemi, Marzyeh Goldenberg, Anna Nagaraj, Sujay Walsh, Elaine Friend, Stephen An Alternative to the Light Touch Digital Health Remote Study: The Stress and Recovery in Frontline COVID-19 Health Care Workers Study |
title | An Alternative to the Light Touch Digital Health Remote Study: The Stress and Recovery in Frontline COVID-19 Health Care Workers Study |
title_full | An Alternative to the Light Touch Digital Health Remote Study: The Stress and Recovery in Frontline COVID-19 Health Care Workers Study |
title_fullStr | An Alternative to the Light Touch Digital Health Remote Study: The Stress and Recovery in Frontline COVID-19 Health Care Workers Study |
title_full_unstemmed | An Alternative to the Light Touch Digital Health Remote Study: The Stress and Recovery in Frontline COVID-19 Health Care Workers Study |
title_short | An Alternative to the Light Touch Digital Health Remote Study: The Stress and Recovery in Frontline COVID-19 Health Care Workers Study |
title_sort | alternative to the light touch digital health remote study: the stress and recovery in frontline covid-19 health care workers study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8668021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34726607 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/32165 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gooddaysarahm analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT karlinemma analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT alfaranoalexandria analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT brooksalexa analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT chapmancarol analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT desillerachelle analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT rangwalashazia analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT karlindanielr analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT emamihoora analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT woodsnancyfugate analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT bochadrien analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT foschiniluca analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT wildmanmackenzie analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT cormackfrancesca analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT taptiklisnick analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT pratapabhishek analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT ghassemimarzyeh analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT goldenberganna analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT nagarajsujay analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT walshelaine analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT friendstephen analternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT gooddaysarahm alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT karlinemma alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT alfaranoalexandria alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT brooksalexa alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT chapmancarol alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT desillerachelle alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT rangwalashazia alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT karlindanielr alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT emamihoora alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT woodsnancyfugate alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT bochadrien alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT foschiniluca alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT wildmanmackenzie alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT cormackfrancesca alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT taptiklisnick alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT pratapabhishek alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT ghassemimarzyeh alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT goldenberganna alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT nagarajsujay alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT walshelaine alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy AT friendstephen alternativetothelighttouchdigitalhealthremotestudythestressandrecoveryinfrontlinecovid19healthcareworkersstudy |