Cargando…
The impact of conducting preclinical systematic reviews on researchers and their research: A mixed method case study
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) are cornerstones of evidence-based medicine and have contributed significantly to breakthroughs since the 1980’s. However, preclinical SRs remain relatively rare despite their many advantages. Since 2011 the Dutch health funding organisation (ZonMw) has run a gra...
Autores principales: | Menon, Julia M. L., Ritskes-Hoitinga, Merel, Pound, Pandora, van Oort, Erica |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8668092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34898637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260619 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Is it possible to overcome issues of external validity in preclinical animal research? Why most animal models are bound to fail
por: Pound, Pandora, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Can prospective systematic reviews of animal studies improve clinical translation?
por: Pound, Pandora, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Reporting quality in preclinical animal experimental research in 2009 and 2018: A nationwide systematic investigation
por: Kousholt, Birgitte S., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Progress in Using Systematic Reviews of Animal Studies to Improve Translational Research
por: Hooijmans, C. R., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Systematic Reviews of Animal Studies; Missing Link in Translational Research?
por: van Luijk, Judith, et al.
Publicado: (2014)