Cargando…

Transdiaphragmatic Approach as a Novel Less Invasive Retroperitoneal Approach at Thoracolumbar Junction: Comparison with Conventional Diaphragmatic Incision

INTRODUCTION: Lateral corpectomy has been considered a minimally invasive surgery, allowing a “transdiaphragmatic approach” at the thoracolumbar junction. This approach allows for a small diaphragmatic incision directly in the retroperitoneal space and the affected vertebra. However, its effectivene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakashima, Hiroaki, Kanemura, Tokumi, Satake, Kotaro, Ito, Kenyu, Tanaka, Satoshi, Segi, Naoki, Ouchida, Jun, Ando, Kei, Kobayashi, Kazuyoshi, Imagama, Shiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8668210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966867
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2020-0191
_version_ 1784614520655708160
author Nakashima, Hiroaki
Kanemura, Tokumi
Satake, Kotaro
Ito, Kenyu
Tanaka, Satoshi
Segi, Naoki
Ouchida, Jun
Ando, Kei
Kobayashi, Kazuyoshi
Imagama, Shiro
author_facet Nakashima, Hiroaki
Kanemura, Tokumi
Satake, Kotaro
Ito, Kenyu
Tanaka, Satoshi
Segi, Naoki
Ouchida, Jun
Ando, Kei
Kobayashi, Kazuyoshi
Imagama, Shiro
author_sort Nakashima, Hiroaki
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lateral corpectomy has been considered a minimally invasive surgery, allowing a “transdiaphragmatic approach” at the thoracolumbar junction. This approach allows for a small diaphragmatic incision directly in the retroperitoneal space and the affected vertebra. However, its effectiveness in comparison to a conventional approach remains unclear. Thus, in this present study, we compared the surgical outcomes between conventional diaphragmatic detachment and the transdiaphragmatic approach in patients with vertebral fracture at the thoracolumbar junction. METHODS: In total, 31 patients with a vertebral fracture at the thoracolumbar junction (T12-L2) were included in this study: 17 underwent a conventional approach, whereas 14 underwent a transdiaphragmatic approach, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The effectiveness of surgery was evaluated in each category of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). RESULTS: Operative time and estimated blood loss were determined to be significantly shorter in the transdiaphragmatic than in the conventional approach. Perioperative complications were observed in the conventional approach (one atelectasis and one pleural effusion), while no complication was noted in the transdiaphragmatic approach. There were no significant differences in postoperative quality of life as assessed by JOABPEQ in terms of pain-related disorders, lumbar spine dysfunction, gait disturbance, social life dysfunction, or psychological disorders between the conventional and transdiaphragmatic approaches. CONCLUSIONS: A “transdiaphragmatic approach” using lateral access surgery has been found to be associated with a shorter operative time and less blood loss with fewer complications than the conventional approach. Given that equivalent clinical outcomes were achieved in both conventional and transdiaphragmatic approaches, this “transdiaphragmatic approach” could be useful because of its minimal invasiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8668210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86682102021-12-28 Transdiaphragmatic Approach as a Novel Less Invasive Retroperitoneal Approach at Thoracolumbar Junction: Comparison with Conventional Diaphragmatic Incision Nakashima, Hiroaki Kanemura, Tokumi Satake, Kotaro Ito, Kenyu Tanaka, Satoshi Segi, Naoki Ouchida, Jun Ando, Kei Kobayashi, Kazuyoshi Imagama, Shiro Spine Surg Relat Res Original Article INTRODUCTION: Lateral corpectomy has been considered a minimally invasive surgery, allowing a “transdiaphragmatic approach” at the thoracolumbar junction. This approach allows for a small diaphragmatic incision directly in the retroperitoneal space and the affected vertebra. However, its effectiveness in comparison to a conventional approach remains unclear. Thus, in this present study, we compared the surgical outcomes between conventional diaphragmatic detachment and the transdiaphragmatic approach in patients with vertebral fracture at the thoracolumbar junction. METHODS: In total, 31 patients with a vertebral fracture at the thoracolumbar junction (T12-L2) were included in this study: 17 underwent a conventional approach, whereas 14 underwent a transdiaphragmatic approach, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The effectiveness of surgery was evaluated in each category of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). RESULTS: Operative time and estimated blood loss were determined to be significantly shorter in the transdiaphragmatic than in the conventional approach. Perioperative complications were observed in the conventional approach (one atelectasis and one pleural effusion), while no complication was noted in the transdiaphragmatic approach. There were no significant differences in postoperative quality of life as assessed by JOABPEQ in terms of pain-related disorders, lumbar spine dysfunction, gait disturbance, social life dysfunction, or psychological disorders between the conventional and transdiaphragmatic approaches. CONCLUSIONS: A “transdiaphragmatic approach” using lateral access surgery has been found to be associated with a shorter operative time and less blood loss with fewer complications than the conventional approach. Given that equivalent clinical outcomes were achieved in both conventional and transdiaphragmatic approaches, this “transdiaphragmatic approach” could be useful because of its minimal invasiveness. The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2021-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8668210/ /pubmed/34966867 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2020-0191 Text en Copyright © 2021 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Nakashima, Hiroaki
Kanemura, Tokumi
Satake, Kotaro
Ito, Kenyu
Tanaka, Satoshi
Segi, Naoki
Ouchida, Jun
Ando, Kei
Kobayashi, Kazuyoshi
Imagama, Shiro
Transdiaphragmatic Approach as a Novel Less Invasive Retroperitoneal Approach at Thoracolumbar Junction: Comparison with Conventional Diaphragmatic Incision
title Transdiaphragmatic Approach as a Novel Less Invasive Retroperitoneal Approach at Thoracolumbar Junction: Comparison with Conventional Diaphragmatic Incision
title_full Transdiaphragmatic Approach as a Novel Less Invasive Retroperitoneal Approach at Thoracolumbar Junction: Comparison with Conventional Diaphragmatic Incision
title_fullStr Transdiaphragmatic Approach as a Novel Less Invasive Retroperitoneal Approach at Thoracolumbar Junction: Comparison with Conventional Diaphragmatic Incision
title_full_unstemmed Transdiaphragmatic Approach as a Novel Less Invasive Retroperitoneal Approach at Thoracolumbar Junction: Comparison with Conventional Diaphragmatic Incision
title_short Transdiaphragmatic Approach as a Novel Less Invasive Retroperitoneal Approach at Thoracolumbar Junction: Comparison with Conventional Diaphragmatic Incision
title_sort transdiaphragmatic approach as a novel less invasive retroperitoneal approach at thoracolumbar junction: comparison with conventional diaphragmatic incision
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8668210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966867
http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2020-0191
work_keys_str_mv AT nakashimahiroaki transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision
AT kanemuratokumi transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision
AT satakekotaro transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision
AT itokenyu transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision
AT tanakasatoshi transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision
AT seginaoki transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision
AT ouchidajun transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision
AT andokei transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision
AT kobayashikazuyoshi transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision
AT imagamashiro transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision