Cargando…
Transdiaphragmatic Approach as a Novel Less Invasive Retroperitoneal Approach at Thoracolumbar Junction: Comparison with Conventional Diaphragmatic Incision
INTRODUCTION: Lateral corpectomy has been considered a minimally invasive surgery, allowing a “transdiaphragmatic approach” at the thoracolumbar junction. This approach allows for a small diaphragmatic incision directly in the retroperitoneal space and the affected vertebra. However, its effectivene...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8668210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966867 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2020-0191 |
_version_ | 1784614520655708160 |
---|---|
author | Nakashima, Hiroaki Kanemura, Tokumi Satake, Kotaro Ito, Kenyu Tanaka, Satoshi Segi, Naoki Ouchida, Jun Ando, Kei Kobayashi, Kazuyoshi Imagama, Shiro |
author_facet | Nakashima, Hiroaki Kanemura, Tokumi Satake, Kotaro Ito, Kenyu Tanaka, Satoshi Segi, Naoki Ouchida, Jun Ando, Kei Kobayashi, Kazuyoshi Imagama, Shiro |
author_sort | Nakashima, Hiroaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Lateral corpectomy has been considered a minimally invasive surgery, allowing a “transdiaphragmatic approach” at the thoracolumbar junction. This approach allows for a small diaphragmatic incision directly in the retroperitoneal space and the affected vertebra. However, its effectiveness in comparison to a conventional approach remains unclear. Thus, in this present study, we compared the surgical outcomes between conventional diaphragmatic detachment and the transdiaphragmatic approach in patients with vertebral fracture at the thoracolumbar junction. METHODS: In total, 31 patients with a vertebral fracture at the thoracolumbar junction (T12-L2) were included in this study: 17 underwent a conventional approach, whereas 14 underwent a transdiaphragmatic approach, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The effectiveness of surgery was evaluated in each category of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). RESULTS: Operative time and estimated blood loss were determined to be significantly shorter in the transdiaphragmatic than in the conventional approach. Perioperative complications were observed in the conventional approach (one atelectasis and one pleural effusion), while no complication was noted in the transdiaphragmatic approach. There were no significant differences in postoperative quality of life as assessed by JOABPEQ in terms of pain-related disorders, lumbar spine dysfunction, gait disturbance, social life dysfunction, or psychological disorders between the conventional and transdiaphragmatic approaches. CONCLUSIONS: A “transdiaphragmatic approach” using lateral access surgery has been found to be associated with a shorter operative time and less blood loss with fewer complications than the conventional approach. Given that equivalent clinical outcomes were achieved in both conventional and transdiaphragmatic approaches, this “transdiaphragmatic approach” could be useful because of its minimal invasiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8668210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86682102021-12-28 Transdiaphragmatic Approach as a Novel Less Invasive Retroperitoneal Approach at Thoracolumbar Junction: Comparison with Conventional Diaphragmatic Incision Nakashima, Hiroaki Kanemura, Tokumi Satake, Kotaro Ito, Kenyu Tanaka, Satoshi Segi, Naoki Ouchida, Jun Ando, Kei Kobayashi, Kazuyoshi Imagama, Shiro Spine Surg Relat Res Original Article INTRODUCTION: Lateral corpectomy has been considered a minimally invasive surgery, allowing a “transdiaphragmatic approach” at the thoracolumbar junction. This approach allows for a small diaphragmatic incision directly in the retroperitoneal space and the affected vertebra. However, its effectiveness in comparison to a conventional approach remains unclear. Thus, in this present study, we compared the surgical outcomes between conventional diaphragmatic detachment and the transdiaphragmatic approach in patients with vertebral fracture at the thoracolumbar junction. METHODS: In total, 31 patients with a vertebral fracture at the thoracolumbar junction (T12-L2) were included in this study: 17 underwent a conventional approach, whereas 14 underwent a transdiaphragmatic approach, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The effectiveness of surgery was evaluated in each category of the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). RESULTS: Operative time and estimated blood loss were determined to be significantly shorter in the transdiaphragmatic than in the conventional approach. Perioperative complications were observed in the conventional approach (one atelectasis and one pleural effusion), while no complication was noted in the transdiaphragmatic approach. There were no significant differences in postoperative quality of life as assessed by JOABPEQ in terms of pain-related disorders, lumbar spine dysfunction, gait disturbance, social life dysfunction, or psychological disorders between the conventional and transdiaphragmatic approaches. CONCLUSIONS: A “transdiaphragmatic approach” using lateral access surgery has been found to be associated with a shorter operative time and less blood loss with fewer complications than the conventional approach. Given that equivalent clinical outcomes were achieved in both conventional and transdiaphragmatic approaches, this “transdiaphragmatic approach” could be useful because of its minimal invasiveness. The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research 2021-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8668210/ /pubmed/34966867 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2020-0191 Text en Copyright © 2021 by The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Spine Surgery and Related Research is an Open Access journal distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nakashima, Hiroaki Kanemura, Tokumi Satake, Kotaro Ito, Kenyu Tanaka, Satoshi Segi, Naoki Ouchida, Jun Ando, Kei Kobayashi, Kazuyoshi Imagama, Shiro Transdiaphragmatic Approach as a Novel Less Invasive Retroperitoneal Approach at Thoracolumbar Junction: Comparison with Conventional Diaphragmatic Incision |
title | Transdiaphragmatic Approach as a Novel Less Invasive Retroperitoneal Approach at Thoracolumbar Junction: Comparison with Conventional Diaphragmatic Incision |
title_full | Transdiaphragmatic Approach as a Novel Less Invasive Retroperitoneal Approach at Thoracolumbar Junction: Comparison with Conventional Diaphragmatic Incision |
title_fullStr | Transdiaphragmatic Approach as a Novel Less Invasive Retroperitoneal Approach at Thoracolumbar Junction: Comparison with Conventional Diaphragmatic Incision |
title_full_unstemmed | Transdiaphragmatic Approach as a Novel Less Invasive Retroperitoneal Approach at Thoracolumbar Junction: Comparison with Conventional Diaphragmatic Incision |
title_short | Transdiaphragmatic Approach as a Novel Less Invasive Retroperitoneal Approach at Thoracolumbar Junction: Comparison with Conventional Diaphragmatic Incision |
title_sort | transdiaphragmatic approach as a novel less invasive retroperitoneal approach at thoracolumbar junction: comparison with conventional diaphragmatic incision |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8668210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34966867 http://dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2020-0191 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakashimahiroaki transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision AT kanemuratokumi transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision AT satakekotaro transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision AT itokenyu transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision AT tanakasatoshi transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision AT seginaoki transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision AT ouchidajun transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision AT andokei transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision AT kobayashikazuyoshi transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision AT imagamashiro transdiaphragmaticapproachasanovellessinvasiveretroperitonealapproachatthoracolumbarjunctioncomparisonwithconventionaldiaphragmaticincision |