Cargando…
Terrestrial or marine species distribution model: Why not both? A case study with seabirds
Species reliant on both the terrestrial and marine realms present a challenge for conventional species distribution models (SDMs). For such species, standard single‐realm SDMs may omit key information that could result in decreased model accuracy and performance. Existing approaches to habitat suita...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8668722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8272 |
_version_ | 1784614635170693120 |
---|---|
author | Häkkinen, Henry Petrovan, Silviu O. Sutherland, William J. Pettorelli, Nathalie |
author_facet | Häkkinen, Henry Petrovan, Silviu O. Sutherland, William J. Pettorelli, Nathalie |
author_sort | Häkkinen, Henry |
collection | PubMed |
description | Species reliant on both the terrestrial and marine realms present a challenge for conventional species distribution models (SDMs). For such species, standard single‐realm SDMs may omit key information that could result in decreased model accuracy and performance. Existing approaches to habitat suitability modeling typically do not effectively combine information from multiple realms; this methodological gap can ultimately hamper management efforts for groups such as seabirds, seals, and turtles. This study, for the first time, jointly incorporates both terrestrial information and marine information into a single species distribution model framework. We do this by sampling nearby marine conditions for a given terrestrial point and vice versa using parameters set by each species’ mean maximum foraging distance and then use standard SDM methods to generate habitat suitability predictions; therefore, our method does not rely on post hoc combination of several different models. Using three seabird species with very different ecologies, we investigate whether this new multi‐realm approach can improve our ability to identify suitable habitats for these species. Results show that incorporating terrestrial information into marine SDMs, or vice versa, generally improves model performance, sometimes drastically. However, there is considerable variability between species in the level of improvement as well as in the particular method that produces the most improvement. Our approach provides a repeatable and transparent method to combine information from multiple ecological realms in a single SDM framework. Important advantages over existing solutions include the opportunity to, firstly, easily combine terrestrial and marine information for species that forage large distances inland or out to sea and, secondly, consider interactions between terrestrial and marine variables. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8668722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86687222021-12-21 Terrestrial or marine species distribution model: Why not both? A case study with seabirds Häkkinen, Henry Petrovan, Silviu O. Sutherland, William J. Pettorelli, Nathalie Ecol Evol Research Articles Species reliant on both the terrestrial and marine realms present a challenge for conventional species distribution models (SDMs). For such species, standard single‐realm SDMs may omit key information that could result in decreased model accuracy and performance. Existing approaches to habitat suitability modeling typically do not effectively combine information from multiple realms; this methodological gap can ultimately hamper management efforts for groups such as seabirds, seals, and turtles. This study, for the first time, jointly incorporates both terrestrial information and marine information into a single species distribution model framework. We do this by sampling nearby marine conditions for a given terrestrial point and vice versa using parameters set by each species’ mean maximum foraging distance and then use standard SDM methods to generate habitat suitability predictions; therefore, our method does not rely on post hoc combination of several different models. Using three seabird species with very different ecologies, we investigate whether this new multi‐realm approach can improve our ability to identify suitable habitats for these species. Results show that incorporating terrestrial information into marine SDMs, or vice versa, generally improves model performance, sometimes drastically. However, there is considerable variability between species in the level of improvement as well as in the particular method that produces the most improvement. Our approach provides a repeatable and transparent method to combine information from multiple ecological realms in a single SDM framework. Important advantages over existing solutions include the opportunity to, firstly, easily combine terrestrial and marine information for species that forage large distances inland or out to sea and, secondly, consider interactions between terrestrial and marine variables. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8668722/ /pubmed/34938462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8272 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Häkkinen, Henry Petrovan, Silviu O. Sutherland, William J. Pettorelli, Nathalie Terrestrial or marine species distribution model: Why not both? A case study with seabirds |
title | Terrestrial or marine species distribution model: Why not both? A case study with seabirds |
title_full | Terrestrial or marine species distribution model: Why not both? A case study with seabirds |
title_fullStr | Terrestrial or marine species distribution model: Why not both? A case study with seabirds |
title_full_unstemmed | Terrestrial or marine species distribution model: Why not both? A case study with seabirds |
title_short | Terrestrial or marine species distribution model: Why not both? A case study with seabirds |
title_sort | terrestrial or marine species distribution model: why not both? a case study with seabirds |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8668722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938462 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8272 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hakkinenhenry terrestrialormarinespeciesdistributionmodelwhynotbothacasestudywithseabirds AT petrovansilviuo terrestrialormarinespeciesdistributionmodelwhynotbothacasestudywithseabirds AT sutherlandwilliamj terrestrialormarinespeciesdistributionmodelwhynotbothacasestudywithseabirds AT pettorellinathalie terrestrialormarinespeciesdistributionmodelwhynotbothacasestudywithseabirds |