Cargando…

Differences in the occurrence and abundance of batoids across an oceanic archipelago using complementary data sources: Implications for conservation

Batoids, distributed from shallow to abyssal depths, are considerably vulnerable to anthropogenic threats. Data deficiencies on the distribution patterns of batoids, however, challenge their effective management and conservation. In this study, we took advantage of the particular geological and geom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tuya, Fernando, Aguilar, Ricardo, Espino, Fernando, Bosch, Nestor E., Meyers, Eva K. M., Jiménez‐Alvarado, David, Castro, Jose J., Otero‐Ferrer, Francisco, Haroun, Ricardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8668743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8290
_version_ 1784614640320249856
author Tuya, Fernando
Aguilar, Ricardo
Espino, Fernando
Bosch, Nestor E.
Meyers, Eva K. M.
Jiménez‐Alvarado, David
Castro, Jose J.
Otero‐Ferrer, Francisco
Haroun, Ricardo
author_facet Tuya, Fernando
Aguilar, Ricardo
Espino, Fernando
Bosch, Nestor E.
Meyers, Eva K. M.
Jiménez‐Alvarado, David
Castro, Jose J.
Otero‐Ferrer, Francisco
Haroun, Ricardo
author_sort Tuya, Fernando
collection PubMed
description Batoids, distributed from shallow to abyssal depths, are considerably vulnerable to anthropogenic threats. Data deficiencies on the distribution patterns of batoids, however, challenge their effective management and conservation. In this study, we took advantage of the particular geological and geomorphological configuration of the Canary Islands, across an east‐to‐west gradient in the eastern Atlantic Ocean, to assess whether patterns in the occurrence and abundance of batoids varied between groups of islands (western, central, and eastern). Data were collected from shallow (<40 m, via underwater visual counts and by a local community science program) and deep waters (60–700 m, via ROV deployments). Eleven species of batoids, assessed by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, were registered, including three “Critically Endangered” (Aetomylaeus bovinus, Dipturus batis, and Myliobatis aquila), three “Endangered” (Gymnura altavela, Mobula mobular, and Rostroraja alba), two “Vulnerable” (Dasyatis pastinaca and Raja maderenseis), and two “Data Deficient” (Taeniurops grabata and Torpedo marmorata). Also, a “Least Concern” species (Bathytoshia lata) was observed. Overall, batoids were ~1 to 2 orders of magnitude more abundant in the central and eastern islands, relative to the western islands. This pattern was consistent among the three sources of data and for both shallow and deep waters. This study, therefore, shows differences in the abundance of batoids across an oceanic archipelago, likely related to varying insular shelf area, availability of habitats, and proximity to the nearby continental (African) mass. Large variation in population abundances among islands suggests that “whole” archipelago management strategies are unlikely to provide adequate conservation. Instead, management plans should be adjusted individually per island and complemented with focused research to fill data gaps on the spatial use and movements of these iconic species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8668743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86687432021-12-21 Differences in the occurrence and abundance of batoids across an oceanic archipelago using complementary data sources: Implications for conservation Tuya, Fernando Aguilar, Ricardo Espino, Fernando Bosch, Nestor E. Meyers, Eva K. M. Jiménez‐Alvarado, David Castro, Jose J. Otero‐Ferrer, Francisco Haroun, Ricardo Ecol Evol Research Articles Batoids, distributed from shallow to abyssal depths, are considerably vulnerable to anthropogenic threats. Data deficiencies on the distribution patterns of batoids, however, challenge their effective management and conservation. In this study, we took advantage of the particular geological and geomorphological configuration of the Canary Islands, across an east‐to‐west gradient in the eastern Atlantic Ocean, to assess whether patterns in the occurrence and abundance of batoids varied between groups of islands (western, central, and eastern). Data were collected from shallow (<40 m, via underwater visual counts and by a local community science program) and deep waters (60–700 m, via ROV deployments). Eleven species of batoids, assessed by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, were registered, including three “Critically Endangered” (Aetomylaeus bovinus, Dipturus batis, and Myliobatis aquila), three “Endangered” (Gymnura altavela, Mobula mobular, and Rostroraja alba), two “Vulnerable” (Dasyatis pastinaca and Raja maderenseis), and two “Data Deficient” (Taeniurops grabata and Torpedo marmorata). Also, a “Least Concern” species (Bathytoshia lata) was observed. Overall, batoids were ~1 to 2 orders of magnitude more abundant in the central and eastern islands, relative to the western islands. This pattern was consistent among the three sources of data and for both shallow and deep waters. This study, therefore, shows differences in the abundance of batoids across an oceanic archipelago, likely related to varying insular shelf area, availability of habitats, and proximity to the nearby continental (African) mass. Large variation in population abundances among islands suggests that “whole” archipelago management strategies are unlikely to provide adequate conservation. Instead, management plans should be adjusted individually per island and complemented with focused research to fill data gaps on the spatial use and movements of these iconic species. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8668743/ /pubmed/34938467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8290 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Tuya, Fernando
Aguilar, Ricardo
Espino, Fernando
Bosch, Nestor E.
Meyers, Eva K. M.
Jiménez‐Alvarado, David
Castro, Jose J.
Otero‐Ferrer, Francisco
Haroun, Ricardo
Differences in the occurrence and abundance of batoids across an oceanic archipelago using complementary data sources: Implications for conservation
title Differences in the occurrence and abundance of batoids across an oceanic archipelago using complementary data sources: Implications for conservation
title_full Differences in the occurrence and abundance of batoids across an oceanic archipelago using complementary data sources: Implications for conservation
title_fullStr Differences in the occurrence and abundance of batoids across an oceanic archipelago using complementary data sources: Implications for conservation
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the occurrence and abundance of batoids across an oceanic archipelago using complementary data sources: Implications for conservation
title_short Differences in the occurrence and abundance of batoids across an oceanic archipelago using complementary data sources: Implications for conservation
title_sort differences in the occurrence and abundance of batoids across an oceanic archipelago using complementary data sources: implications for conservation
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8668743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8290
work_keys_str_mv AT tuyafernando differencesintheoccurrenceandabundanceofbatoidsacrossanoceanicarchipelagousingcomplementarydatasourcesimplicationsforconservation
AT aguilarricardo differencesintheoccurrenceandabundanceofbatoidsacrossanoceanicarchipelagousingcomplementarydatasourcesimplicationsforconservation
AT espinofernando differencesintheoccurrenceandabundanceofbatoidsacrossanoceanicarchipelagousingcomplementarydatasourcesimplicationsforconservation
AT boschnestore differencesintheoccurrenceandabundanceofbatoidsacrossanoceanicarchipelagousingcomplementarydatasourcesimplicationsforconservation
AT meyersevakm differencesintheoccurrenceandabundanceofbatoidsacrossanoceanicarchipelagousingcomplementarydatasourcesimplicationsforconservation
AT jimenezalvaradodavid differencesintheoccurrenceandabundanceofbatoidsacrossanoceanicarchipelagousingcomplementarydatasourcesimplicationsforconservation
AT castrojosej differencesintheoccurrenceandabundanceofbatoidsacrossanoceanicarchipelagousingcomplementarydatasourcesimplicationsforconservation
AT oteroferrerfrancisco differencesintheoccurrenceandabundanceofbatoidsacrossanoceanicarchipelagousingcomplementarydatasourcesimplicationsforconservation
AT harounricardo differencesintheoccurrenceandabundanceofbatoidsacrossanoceanicarchipelagousingcomplementarydatasourcesimplicationsforconservation