Systematic Reviews of the Literature Are Not Always Either Useful Or the Best Way To Add To Science

Systematic reviews are becoming more popular as a way of doing research; however, not all systematic reviews are clinically useful and sometimes another type of review (scoping, topical, or critical) would be of greater value to the clinical and scientific community. The different types of review an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Powell, Janet T., Koelemay, Mark J.W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Review
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8668828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34917997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2021.10.021
_version_ 1784614660513726464
author Powell, Janet T.
Koelemay, Mark J.W.
author_facet Powell, Janet T.
Koelemay, Mark J.W.
author_sort Powell, Janet T.
collection PubMed
description Systematic reviews are becoming more popular as a way of doing research; however, not all systematic reviews are clinically useful and sometimes another type of review (scoping, topical, or critical) would be of greater value to the clinical and scientific community. The different types of review and their use are described, illustrated by examples relevant to vascular surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8668828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86688282021-12-15 Systematic Reviews of the Literature Are Not Always Either Useful Or the Best Way To Add To Science Powell, Janet T. Koelemay, Mark J.W. EJVES Vasc Forum Review Systematic reviews are becoming more popular as a way of doing research; however, not all systematic reviews are clinically useful and sometimes another type of review (scoping, topical, or critical) would be of greater value to the clinical and scientific community. The different types of review and their use are described, illustrated by examples relevant to vascular surgery. Elsevier 2021-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8668828/ /pubmed/34917997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2021.10.021 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society for Vascular Surgery. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Powell, Janet T.
Koelemay, Mark J.W.
Systematic Reviews of the Literature Are Not Always Either Useful Or the Best Way To Add To Science
title Systematic Reviews of the Literature Are Not Always Either Useful Or the Best Way To Add To Science
title_full Systematic Reviews of the Literature Are Not Always Either Useful Or the Best Way To Add To Science
title_fullStr Systematic Reviews of the Literature Are Not Always Either Useful Or the Best Way To Add To Science
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Reviews of the Literature Are Not Always Either Useful Or the Best Way To Add To Science
title_short Systematic Reviews of the Literature Are Not Always Either Useful Or the Best Way To Add To Science
title_sort systematic reviews of the literature are not always either useful or the best way to add to science
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8668828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34917997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2021.10.021
work_keys_str_mv AT powelljanett systematicreviewsoftheliteraturearenotalwayseitherusefulorthebestwaytoaddtoscience
AT koelemaymarkjw systematicreviewsoftheliteraturearenotalwayseitherusefulorthebestwaytoaddtoscience

Ejemplares similares