Cargando…
Systematic Reviews of the Literature Are Not Always Either Useful Or the Best Way To Add To Science
Systematic reviews are becoming more popular as a way of doing research; however, not all systematic reviews are clinically useful and sometimes another type of review (scoping, topical, or critical) would be of greater value to the clinical and scientific community. The different types of review an...
Autores principales: | Powell, Janet T., Koelemay, Mark J.W. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8668828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34917997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2021.10.021 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Always aiming for the best: For scientists and for science
por: Hall, Alan
Publicado: (2014) -
Either way
por: Sims, Zoot
Publicado: (1992) -
Commentary: Ascending Aortic Aneurysm: The Best Way Out Is Always Through
por: Kim, Tae-Hoon, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Meta-analysis is not always the best way to round out a systematic review: a few thoughts prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic and “spiced-up” with an earthquake
por: Trkulja, Vladimir, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
There Is Always Another Way! Cytomegalovirus’ Multifaceted Dissemination Schemes
por: Jackson, Joseph W., et al.
Publicado: (2018)