Cargando…
Scientific conclusions need not be accurate, justified, or believed by their authors
We argue that the main results of scientific papers may appropriately be published even if they are false, unjustified, and not believed to be true or justified by their author. To defend this claim we draw upon the literature studying the norms of assertion, and consider how they would apply if one...
Autores principales: | Dang, Haixin, Bright, Liam Kofi |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8668838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34970009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03158-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
We need leaders that believe in scientific evidence
por: Pariente, Nonia
Publicado: (2020) -
Scientific counterfactuals as make-believe
por: Iranzo-Ribera, Noelia
Publicado: (2022) -
Field triage in trauma – do the data really justify the conclusions?
por: Sandberg, Mårten
Publicado: (2009) -
RE: Field triage in trauma – do the data really justify the conclusions?
por: Rehn, Marius, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Proton Therapy in LMICs: Is the Need Justified?
por: Chilukuri, Srinivas, et al.
Publicado: (2022)