Cargando…
Assessment of the cost-effectiveness of Australia's risk-sharing agreement for direct-acting antiviral treatments for hepatitis C: a modelling study
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C elimination may be possible with broad uptake of direct-acting antiviral treatments (DAAs). In 2016 the Australian government committed A$1.2 billion for five years of unlimited DAAs (March 2016 to February 2021) in a risk-sharing agreement with pharmaceutical companies. We a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8669355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35024654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100316 |
_version_ | 1784614761926754304 |
---|---|
author | Scott, Dr Nick Palmer, Ms Anna Tidhar, Mr Tom Stoove, Prof Mark Sacks-Davis, Dr Rachel S. Doyle, A/Prof Joseph S. Pedrana, Dr Alisa J. Thompson, Prof Alexander Wilson, Prof David P. Hellard, Prof Margaret |
author_facet | Scott, Dr Nick Palmer, Ms Anna Tidhar, Mr Tom Stoove, Prof Mark Sacks-Davis, Dr Rachel S. Doyle, A/Prof Joseph S. Pedrana, Dr Alisa J. Thompson, Prof Alexander Wilson, Prof David P. Hellard, Prof Margaret |
author_sort | Scott, Dr Nick |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C elimination may be possible with broad uptake of direct-acting antiviral treatments (DAAs). In 2016 the Australian government committed A$1.2 billion for five years of unlimited DAAs (March 2016 to February 2021) in a risk-sharing agreement with pharmaceutical companies. We assess the impact, cost-effectiveness and net economic benefits likely to be realised from this investment. METHODS: Mathematical modelling to project outcomes for 2016-2030 included: (S1) a counter-factual scenario (testing/treatment maintained at pre-2016 levels); (S2) the current status-quo (testing/treatment as actually occurred 2016-2019, with trends maintained to 2030); and (S3) elimination scenario (S2 plus testing/treatment rates increased between 2021-2030 to achieve the WHO elimination targets). FINDINGS: S1 resulted in 68,800 new hepatitis C infections and 18,540 hepatitis C-related deaths over 2016-2030. The total health system cost (HCV testing, treatment, disease management) was A$3.01 billion and the cost of lost productivity due to absenteeism, presenteeism and premature deaths was A$26.14 billion. S2 averted 15,700 (23%) new infections and 8,500 (46%) deaths by 2030, with a total health system cost of A$3.48 billion, A$472 million more than S1 (A$1.65 billion more in testing/treatment but A$1.20 billion less in disease costs; A$5,752 per QALY gained from a health systems perspective). Productivity loss over 2016-2030 was A$19.96 billion, A$6.17 less than S1, making S2 cost-saving from a societal perspective by 2022 with a net economic benefit of A$5.70 billion by 2030. S3 averted an additional 10,000 infections and 930 deaths compared with S2 and increased the longer-term economic benefit. INTERPRETATION: Five years of unrestricted access to DAAs in Australia has led to significant health benefits and is likely to become cost-saving from a societal perspective by 2022. FUNDING: Burnet Institute |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8669355 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86693552022-01-11 Assessment of the cost-effectiveness of Australia's risk-sharing agreement for direct-acting antiviral treatments for hepatitis C: a modelling study Scott, Dr Nick Palmer, Ms Anna Tidhar, Mr Tom Stoove, Prof Mark Sacks-Davis, Dr Rachel S. Doyle, A/Prof Joseph S. Pedrana, Dr Alisa J. Thompson, Prof Alexander Wilson, Prof David P. Hellard, Prof Margaret Lancet Reg Health West Pac Research Paper BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C elimination may be possible with broad uptake of direct-acting antiviral treatments (DAAs). In 2016 the Australian government committed A$1.2 billion for five years of unlimited DAAs (March 2016 to February 2021) in a risk-sharing agreement with pharmaceutical companies. We assess the impact, cost-effectiveness and net economic benefits likely to be realised from this investment. METHODS: Mathematical modelling to project outcomes for 2016-2030 included: (S1) a counter-factual scenario (testing/treatment maintained at pre-2016 levels); (S2) the current status-quo (testing/treatment as actually occurred 2016-2019, with trends maintained to 2030); and (S3) elimination scenario (S2 plus testing/treatment rates increased between 2021-2030 to achieve the WHO elimination targets). FINDINGS: S1 resulted in 68,800 new hepatitis C infections and 18,540 hepatitis C-related deaths over 2016-2030. The total health system cost (HCV testing, treatment, disease management) was A$3.01 billion and the cost of lost productivity due to absenteeism, presenteeism and premature deaths was A$26.14 billion. S2 averted 15,700 (23%) new infections and 8,500 (46%) deaths by 2030, with a total health system cost of A$3.48 billion, A$472 million more than S1 (A$1.65 billion more in testing/treatment but A$1.20 billion less in disease costs; A$5,752 per QALY gained from a health systems perspective). Productivity loss over 2016-2030 was A$19.96 billion, A$6.17 less than S1, making S2 cost-saving from a societal perspective by 2022 with a net economic benefit of A$5.70 billion by 2030. S3 averted an additional 10,000 infections and 930 deaths compared with S2 and increased the longer-term economic benefit. INTERPRETATION: Five years of unrestricted access to DAAs in Australia has led to significant health benefits and is likely to become cost-saving from a societal perspective by 2022. FUNDING: Burnet Institute Elsevier 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8669355/ /pubmed/35024654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100316 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Scott, Dr Nick Palmer, Ms Anna Tidhar, Mr Tom Stoove, Prof Mark Sacks-Davis, Dr Rachel S. Doyle, A/Prof Joseph S. Pedrana, Dr Alisa J. Thompson, Prof Alexander Wilson, Prof David P. Hellard, Prof Margaret Assessment of the cost-effectiveness of Australia's risk-sharing agreement for direct-acting antiviral treatments for hepatitis C: a modelling study |
title | Assessment of the cost-effectiveness of Australia's risk-sharing agreement for direct-acting antiviral treatments for hepatitis C: a modelling study |
title_full | Assessment of the cost-effectiveness of Australia's risk-sharing agreement for direct-acting antiviral treatments for hepatitis C: a modelling study |
title_fullStr | Assessment of the cost-effectiveness of Australia's risk-sharing agreement for direct-acting antiviral treatments for hepatitis C: a modelling study |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of the cost-effectiveness of Australia's risk-sharing agreement for direct-acting antiviral treatments for hepatitis C: a modelling study |
title_short | Assessment of the cost-effectiveness of Australia's risk-sharing agreement for direct-acting antiviral treatments for hepatitis C: a modelling study |
title_sort | assessment of the cost-effectiveness of australia's risk-sharing agreement for direct-acting antiviral treatments for hepatitis c: a modelling study |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8669355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35024654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100316 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scottdrnick assessmentofthecosteffectivenessofaustraliasrisksharingagreementfordirectactingantiviraltreatmentsforhepatitiscamodellingstudy AT palmermsanna assessmentofthecosteffectivenessofaustraliasrisksharingagreementfordirectactingantiviraltreatmentsforhepatitiscamodellingstudy AT tidharmrtom assessmentofthecosteffectivenessofaustraliasrisksharingagreementfordirectactingantiviraltreatmentsforhepatitiscamodellingstudy AT stooveprofmark assessmentofthecosteffectivenessofaustraliasrisksharingagreementfordirectactingantiviraltreatmentsforhepatitiscamodellingstudy AT sacksdavisdrrachels assessmentofthecosteffectivenessofaustraliasrisksharingagreementfordirectactingantiviraltreatmentsforhepatitiscamodellingstudy AT doyleaprofjosephs assessmentofthecosteffectivenessofaustraliasrisksharingagreementfordirectactingantiviraltreatmentsforhepatitiscamodellingstudy AT pedranadralisaj assessmentofthecosteffectivenessofaustraliasrisksharingagreementfordirectactingantiviraltreatmentsforhepatitiscamodellingstudy AT thompsonprofalexander assessmentofthecosteffectivenessofaustraliasrisksharingagreementfordirectactingantiviraltreatmentsforhepatitiscamodellingstudy AT wilsonprofdavidp assessmentofthecosteffectivenessofaustraliasrisksharingagreementfordirectactingantiviraltreatmentsforhepatitiscamodellingstudy AT hellardprofmargaret assessmentofthecosteffectivenessofaustraliasrisksharingagreementfordirectactingantiviraltreatmentsforhepatitiscamodellingstudy |